| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
exposes an initializeMyPassFunction(), which
must be called in the pass's constructor. This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
the pass's dependencies.
Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes. Clients that want to use the
CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
before parsing commandline arguments.
I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin. It is possible that there are problems
with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options. If you encounter any crash in pass
registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.
llvm-svn: 116820
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 116387
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 115996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fix: add a flag to MapValue and friends which indicates whether
any module-level mappings are being made. In the common case of
inlining, no module-level mappings are needed, so MapValue doesn't
need to examine non-function-local metadata, which can be very
expensive in the case of a large module with really deep metadata
(e.g. a large C++ program compiled with -g).
This flag is a little awkward; perhaps eventually it can be moved
into the ClonedCodeInfo class.
llvm-svn: 112190
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 110460
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 110410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
address of the static
ID member as the sole unique type identifier. Clean up APIs related to this change.
llvm-svn: 110396
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 109099
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 109045
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ValueMapper used by various cloning utility maps MDNodes also.
llvm-svn: 106706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
arguments are handled with a new InlineFunctionInfo class. This
makes it easier to extend InlineFunction to return more info in the
future.
llvm-svn: 102137
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 95781
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 92733
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
VISIBILITY_HIDDEN removal.
llvm-svn: 85043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Chris claims we should never have visibility_hidden inside any .cpp file but
that's still not true even after this commit.
llvm-svn: 85042
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 81250
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 76702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
number of issues in
our current context-passing stuff, which is also fixed here
llvm-svn: 76089
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 74773
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 73412
|
|
is that, for functions whose bodies are entirely guarded by an if-statement, it
can be profitable to pull the test out of the callee and into the caller.
This code has had some cursory testing, but still has a number of known issues
on the LLVM test suite.
llvm-svn: 73338
|