| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This encompasses several changes which are all interconnected:
- Use the MC framework for printing almost all instructions.
- AsmStrings are now live.
- This introduces an indirection between LLVM vregs and WebAssembly registers,
and a new pass, WebAssemblyRegNumbering, for computing a basic the mapping.
This addresses some basic issues with argument registers and unused registers.
- The way ARGUMENT instructions are handled no longer generates redundant
get_local+set_local for every argument.
This also changes the assembly syntax somewhat; most notably, MC's printing
use sigils on label names, so those are no longer present, and push/pop now
have a sigil to keep them unambiguous.
The usage of set_local/get_local/$push/$pop will continue to evolve
significantly. This patch is just one step of a larger change.
llvm-svn: 252858
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Calls involved in thread-local variable lookup save more registers
than normal calls.
rdar://problem/23073171
llvm-svn: 252837
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14357
rdar://problem/21942589
llvm-svn: 252825
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Other personalities don't use this special frame slot.
Reviewers: majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14580
llvm-svn: 252778
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MIPS32 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any MIPS32
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this patch is
that we get this code:
ctlz:
jr $ra
clz $2, $4
cttz:
addiu $1, $4, -1
not $2, $4
and $1, $2, $1
clz $1, $1
addiu $2, $zero, 32
jr $ra
subu $2, $2, $1
Instead of:
ctlz:
beqz $4, $BB0_2
addiu $2, $zero, 32
clz $2, $4
$BB0_2:
jr $ra
nop
cttz:
beqz $4, $BB1_2
addiu $2, $zero, 32
addiu $1, $4, -1
not $2, $4
and $1, $2, $1
clz $1, $1
addiu $2, $zero, 32
subu $2, $2, $1
$BB1_2:
jr $ra
nop
See D14469 for the larger motivation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14500
llvm-svn: 252755
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I missed the side-effects of ParseBFI in my previous attempt (r252748).
Thanks dblaikie for the suggestion of adding a void use of the unused
variable instead.
llvm-svn: 252751
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252748
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instruction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13316
Fixes PR25003
llvm-svn: 252743
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
If we have a chain of BFIs, we may be able to combine several together into one merged BFI. We can do this if the "from" bits from one BFI OR'd with the "from" bits from the other BFI form a contiguous range, and the same with the "to" bits.
llvm-svn: 252740
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
expression"; NFC.
llvm-svn: 252728
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If possible and profitable, replace lea %reg, 1(%reg) and lea %reg, -1(%reg) with inc %reg and dec %reg respectively.
Patch by: anton.nadolsky@intel.com
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14059
llvm-svn: 252722
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
introduced with SSE or SSE2.
llvm-svn: 252709
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252708
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252687
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow-up to r235963: this matches other assemblers and is less
unexpected (e.g. PR23227).
llvm-svn: 252681
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252677
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252675
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252674
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Inserting it before the target block could be bad, we might already have
a fallthrough edge to it.
llvm-svn: 252670
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252656
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252654
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252653
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds a pass for doing PowerPC peephole optimizations at the
MI level while the code is still in SSA form. This allows for easy
modifications to the instructions while depending on a subsequent pass
of DCE. Both passes are very fast due to the characteristics of SSA.
At this time, the only peepholes added are for cleaning up various
redundancies involving the XXPERMDI instruction. However, I would
expect this will be a useful place to add more peepholes for
inefficiencies generated during instruction selection. The pass is
placed after VSX swap optimization, as it is best to let that pass
remove unnecessary swaps before performing any remaining clean-ups.
The utility of these clean-ups are demonstrated by changes to four
existing test cases, all of which now have tighter expected code
generation. I've also added Eric Schweiz's bugpoint-reduced test from
PR25157, for which we now generate tight code. One other test started
failing for me, and I've fixed it
(test/Transforms/PlaceSafepoints/finite-loops.ll) as well; this is not
related to my changes, and I'm not sure why it works before and not
after. The problem is that the CHECK-NOT: of "statepoint" from test1
fails because of the "statepoint" in test2, and so forth. Adding a
CHECK-LABEL in between keeps the different occurrences of that string
properly scoped.
llvm-svn: 252651
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ARM V6T2 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any ARM V6T2
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this patch is
that we get this code:
ctlz:
clz r0, r0
bx lr
cttz:
rbit r0, r0
clz r0, r0
bx lr
Instead of:
ctlz:
cmp r0, #0
moveq r0, #32
clzne r0, r0
bx lr
cttz:
cmp r0, #0
moveq r0, #32
rbitne r0, r0
clzne r0, r0
bx lr
This will help solve a general speculation/despeculation problem noted in PR24818:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24818
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14469
llvm-svn: 252639
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
isCheapToSpeculateCtlz()
AArch64 has instructions for efficient count-leading/trailing-zeros, so this should be
considered a cheap operation (and therefore fair game for speculation) for any AArch64
implementation.
The net result of allowing this speculation for the regression tests in this
patch is that we get this code:
ctlz:
clz w0, w0
ret
cttz:
rbit w8, w0
clz w0, w8
ret
Instead of:
ctlz:
cbz w0, .LBB0_2
clz w0, w0
ret
.LBB0_2:
orr w0, wzr, #0x20
ret
cttz:
cbz w0, .LBB1_2
rbit w8, w0
clz w0, w8
ret
.LBB1_2:
orr w0, wzr, #0x20
ret
See D14469 for the larger motivation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14505
llvm-svn: 252625
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14495
llvm-svn: 252621
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added fixes for stage2 failures: CMOV is not commutable; commuting the operands results in the condition being flipped! d'oh!
Original commit message:
If we have a CMOV, OR and AND combination such as:
if (x & CN)
y |= CM;
And:
* CN is a single bit;
* All bits covered by CM are known zero in y;
Then we can convert this to a sequence of BFI instructions. This will always be a win if CM is a single bit, will always be no worse than the TST & OR sequence if CM is two bits, and for thumb will be no worse if CM is three bits (due to the extra IT instruction).
llvm-svn: 252606
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The local variable Hi is never being read.
Issue identified by the Clang static analyzer.
llvm-svn: 252600
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For big-endian targets, when we merge two halfword loads into a word load, the
order of the halfwords in the loaded value is reversed compared to
little-endian, so the load-store optimiser needs to swap the destination
registers.
This does not affect merging of two word loads, as we use ldp, which treats the
memory as two separate 32-bit words.
llvm-svn: 252597
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14492
llvm-svn: 252592
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252582
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252580
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252579
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For CoreCLR on Windows, stack probes must be emitted as inline sequences that probe successive stack pages
between the current stack limit and the desired new stack pointer location. This implements support for
the inline expansion on x64.
For in-body alloca probes, expansion is done during instruction lowering. For prolog probes, a stub call
is initially emitted during prolog creation, and expanded after epilog generation, to avoid complications
that arise when introducing new machine basic blocks during prolog and epilog creation.
Added a new test case, modified an existing one to exclude non-x64 coreclr (for now).
Add test case
Fix tests
llvm-svn: 252578
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252574
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AArch64 has the ability to use the top 8-bits of an "address" for extra
information, with the memory subsystem automatically masking them off for loads
and stores. When that's happening, we can sometimes skip masks on memory
operations in the compiler.
However, this requires the host OS and support stack to preserve those bits so
it can't be enabled everywhere. In principle iOS 8.0 and above do take the
required precautions and but we'll put it under a flag for now.
llvm-svn: 252573
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lower LLVM's 'unreachable' terminator to ISD::TRAP, and lower ISD::TRAP to
wasm's 'unreachable' expression.
WebAssembly type-checks expressions, but a noreturn function with a
return type that doesn't match the context will cause a check
failure. So we lower LLVM 'unreachable' to ISD::TRAP and then lower that
to WebAssembly's 'unreachable' expression, which typechecks in any
context and causes a trap if executed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14515
llvm-svn: 252566
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252561
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a bug in ARMAsmPrinter::EmitUnwindingInstruction where
llvm_unreachable was reached because t2ADDri wasn't handled.
Test case provided by Tim Northover.
rdar://problem/23270609
http://reviews.llvm.org/D14518
llvm-svn: 252557
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252555
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes machine verification failures with David's latest EH change.
llvm-svn: 252541
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was suggested in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13956
and is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL252515
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL252519
This lets us remove logically equivalent/duplicated code from DAGCombiner and X86ISelDAGToDAG.
A corresponding function for IR instructions already exists in ValueTracking.
llvm-svn: 252539
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead, emit a CATCHPAD node which will get selected to a target
specific sequence.
llvm-svn: 252528
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The motivation for this patch starts with the epic fail example in PR18007:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18007
...unfortunately, this patch makes no difference for that case, but it solves some
simpler cases. We'll get there some day. :)
The current 'or' matching code was using computeKnownBits() via
isBaseWithConstantOffset() -> MaskedValueIsZero(), but that's an unnecessarily limited use.
We can do more by copying the logic in ValueTracking's haveNoCommonBitsSet(), so we can
treat the 'or' as if it was an 'add'.
There's a TODO comment here because we should lift the bit-checking logic into a helper
function, so it's not duplicated in DAGCombiner.
An example of the better LEA matching:
leal (%rdi,%rdi), %eax
andl $1, %esi
orl %esi, %eax
Becomes:
andl $1, %esi
leal (%rsi,%rdi,2), %eax
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13956
llvm-svn: 252515
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252513
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For some reason we'd never run MachineVerifier on WinEH code, and you
explicitly have to ask for it with llc. I added it to a few test cases
to get some coverage.
Fixes PR25461.
llvm-svn: 252512
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252505
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252502
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This matches the sum-of-absdiff patterns emitted by the vectoriser using log2 shuffles.
Relies on D14207 to be able to match the `extract_subvector(..., 0)`
Reviewers: t.p.northover, jmolloy
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14208
llvm-svn: 252465
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Lowering this pattern early to an `EXTRACT_SUBREG` was making it impossible to match larger patterns in tblgen that use `extract_subvector(..., 0)` as part of the their input pattern.
It seems like there will exist somewhere a better way of specifying this pattern over all relevant register value types, but I didn't manage to find it.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, jmolloy
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14207
llvm-svn: 252464
|