| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Whole quad mode is already enabled for pixel shaders that compute
derivatives, but it must be suspended for instructions that cause a
shader to have side effects (i.e. stores and atomics).
This pass addresses the issue by storing the real (initial) live mask
in a register, masking EXEC before instructions that require exact
execution and (re-)enabling WQM where required.
This pass is run before register coalescing so that we can use
machine SSA for analysis.
The changes in this patch expose a problem with the second machine
scheduling pass: target independent instructions like COPY implicitly
use EXEC when they operate on VGPRs, but this fact is not encoded in
the MIR. This can lead to miscompilation because instructions are
moved past changes to EXEC.
This patch fixes the problem by adding use-implicit operands to
target independent instructions. Some general codegen passes are
relaxed to work with such implicit use operands.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: MatzeB, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18162
llvm-svn: 263982
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 263981
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 263980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- R10 and R11 are not reserved registers.
- Check for reserved registers when finding unused caller-saved registers.
llvm-svn: 263977
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 263976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
When control flow is implemented using the exec mask, the compiler will
insert branch instructions to skip over the masked section when exec is
zero if the section contains more than a certain number of instructions.
The previous code would only count instructions in successor blocks,
and this patch modifies the code to start counting instructions in all
blocks between the start and end of the branch.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18282
llvm-svn: 263969
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 263965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These instructions do not have the same negative base
address problem that DS instructions do on SI.
llvm-svn: 263964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This introduces a custom lowering for ISD::SETCCE (introduced in r253572)
that allows us to emit a short code sequence for 64-bit compares.
Before:
push {r7, lr}
cmp r0, r2
mov.w r0, #0
mov.w r12, #0
it hs
movhs r0, #1
cmp r1, r3
it ge
movge.w r12, #1
it eq
moveq r12, r0
cmp.w r12, #0
bne .LBB1_2
@ BB#1: @ %bb1
bl f
pop {r7, pc}
.LBB1_2: @ %bb2
bl g
pop {r7, pc}
After:
push {r7, lr}
subs r0, r0, r2
sbcs.w r0, r1, r3
bge .LBB1_2
@ BB#1: @ %bb1
bl f
pop {r7, pc}
.LBB1_2: @ %bb2
bl g
pop {r7, pc}
Saves around 80KB in Chromium's libchrome.so.
Some notes on this patch:
- I don't much like the ARMISD::BRCOND and ARMISD::CMOV combines I
introduced (nothing else needs them). However, they are necessary in
order to avoid poor codegen, and they seem similar to existing combines
in other backends (e.g. X86 combines (brcond (cmp (setcc Compare))) to
(brcond Compare)).
- No support for Thumb-1. This is in principle possible, but we'd need
to implement ARMISD::SUBE for Thumb-1.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15256
llvm-svn: 263962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adding Cortex-A32 as an available target in the ARM backend.
Patch by Sam Parker.
llvm-svn: 263956
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 263948
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 263942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The old address space inference pass (NVPTXFavorNonGenericAddrSpaces) is unable
to convert the address space of a pointer induction variable. This patch adds a
new pass called NVPTXInferAddressSpaces that overcomes that limitation using a
fixed-point data-flow analysis (see the file header comments for details).
The new pass is experimental and not enabled by default. Users can turn
it on by setting the -nvptx-use-infer-addrspace flag of llc.
Reviewers: jholewinski, tra, jlebar
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17965
llvm-svn: 263916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
computeZeroableShuffleElements
Based on feedback for D14261
llvm-svn: 263911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Improve computeZeroableShuffleElements to be able to peek through bitcasts to extract zero/undef values from BUILD_VECTOR nodes of different element sizes to the shuffle mask.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14261
llvm-svn: 263906
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18211
llvm-svn: 263898
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 263889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We need to be careful on which registers can be explicitly handled
via copies. Prologue, Epilogue use physical registers and if one belongs
to the set of CSRsViaCopy, it will no longer be CSRed, since PEI overwrites
it after the explicit copies.
llvm-svn: 263857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since CXX_FAST_TLS has a bigger set of CSRs, we don't tail call when caller
and callee have mismatched calling conventions.
llvm-svn: 263856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since at O0, explicit copies via SplitCSR may not be removed even if
they are unnecessary, we choose not to use SplitCSR at O0.
llvm-svn: 263855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Avoid modifying other modules in `AArch64PromoteConstant` when the
constant is `ConstantData` (a horrible accident, I'm sure, caught by an
experimental follow-up to r261464).
Previously, this walked through all the users of a constant, but that
reaches into other modules when the constant doesn't depend transitively
on a `GlobalValue`! Since we're walking instructions anyway, just
modify the instructions we actually see.
As a drive-by, instead of storing `Use` and getting the instructions
again via `Use::getUser()` (which is not a constantant time lookup),
store `std::pair<Instruction, unsigned>`. Besides being cheaper, this
makes it easier to drop use-lists form `ConstantData` in the future.
(I threw this in because I was touching all the code anyway.)
Because the patch completely changes the traversal logic, it looks
like a rewrite of the pass, but the core logic is all the same (or
should be, minus the out-of-module changes). In other words, there
should be NFC as long as the LLVMContext only has a single Module.
I didn't think of a good way to test this, but I hope to submit a patch
eventually that makes walking these use-lists illegal/impossible.
llvm-svn: 263853
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 263842
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes an issue with rL263658 pointed out by Tom Stellard.
llvm-svn: 263823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds unscaled loads and sign-extend loads to the TII
getMemOpBaseRegImmOfs API, which is used to control clustering in the MI
scheduler. This is done to create more opportunities for load pairing. I've
also added the scaled LDRSWui instruction, which was missing from the scaled
instructions. Finally, I've added support in shouldClusterLoads for clustering
adjacent sext and zext loads that too can be paired by the load/store optimizer.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18048
llvm-svn: 263819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Allow the selection of BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_x and _XY. Do this now before
the frontend patches land in Mesa. Eventually, we may want to automatically
reduce the size of loads at the LLVM IR level, which requires such overloads,
and in some cases Mesa can generate them directly.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18255
llvm-svn: 263792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
These intrinsics expose the BUFFER_ATOMIC_* instructions and will be used
by Mesa to implement atomics with buffer semantics. The intrinsic interface
matches that of buffer.load.format and buffer.store.format, except that the
GLC bit is not exposed (it is automatically deduced based on whether the
return value is used).
The change of hasSideEffects is required for TableGen to accept the pattern
that matches the intrinsic.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, rivanvx, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18151
llvm-svn: 263791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
We cannot easily deduce that an offset is in an SGPR, but the Mesa frontend
cannot easily make use of an explicit soffset parameter either. Furthermore,
it is likely that in the future, LLVM will be in a better position than the
frontend to choose an SGPR offset if possible.
Since there aren't any frontend uses of these intrinsics in upstream
repositories yet, I would like to take this opportunity to change the
intrinsic signatures to a single offset parameter, which is then selected
to immediate offsets or voffsets using a ComplexPattern.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18218
llvm-svn: 263790
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18267
llvm-svn: 263789
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 263775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
It can hurt performance to prefetch ahead too much. Be conservative for
now and don't prefetch ahead more than 3 iterations on Cyclone.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17949
llvm-svn: 263772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
And use this TTI for Cyclone. As it was explained in the original RFC
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/92758), the HW
prefetcher work up to 2KB strides.
I am also adding tests for this and the previous change (D17943):
* Cyclone prefetching accesses with a large stride
* Cyclone not prefetching accesses with a small stride
* Generic Aarch64 subtarget not prefetching either
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17945
llvm-svn: 263771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This wires up the pass for Cyclone but keeps it off for now because we
need a few more TTIs.
The getPrefetchMinStride value is not very well tuned right now but it
works well with CFP2006/433.milc which motivated this.
Tests will be added as part of the upcoming large-stride prefetching
patch.
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, hfinkel, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17943
llvm-svn: 263770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For fcmp, major concern about the following 6 cases is NaN result. The
comparison result consists of 4 bits, indicating lt, eq, gt and un (unordered),
only one of which will be set. The result is generated by fcmpu
instruction. However, bc instruction only inspects one of the first 3
bits, so when un is set, bc instruction may jump to to an undesired
place.
More specifically, if we expect an unordered comparison and un is set, we
expect to always go to true branch; in such case UEQ, UGT and ULT still
give false, which are undesired; but UNE, UGE, ULE happen to give true,
since they are tested by inspecting !eq, !lt, !gt, respectively.
Similarly, for ordered comparison, when un is set, we always expect the
result to be false. In such case OGT, OLT and OEQ is good, since they are
actually testing GT, LT, and EQ respectively, which are false. OGE, OLE
and ONE are tested through !lt, !gt and !eq, and these are true.
llvm-svn: 263753
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 263741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch prevents CTR loops optimization when using soft float operations
inside loop body. Soft float operations use function calls, but function
calls are not allowed inside CTR optimized loops.
Patch by Aleksandar Beserminji.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17600
llvm-svn: 263727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
MRI::eliminateFrameIndex can emit several instructions to do address
calculations; these can usually be stackified. Because instructions with
FI operands can have subsequent operands which may be expression trees,
find the top of the leftmost tree and insert the code before it, to keep
the LIFO property.
Also use stackified registers when writing back the SP value to memory
in the epilog; it's unnecessary because SP will not be used after the
epilog, and it results in better code.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18234
llvm-svn: 263725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Symmary:
ds_permute/ds_bpermute do not read memory so s_waitcnt is not needed.
Reviewers
arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers
llvm-commits, arsenm
Differential Revision:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18197
llvm-svn: 263720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
As explained by the comment, threads will typically see different values
returned by atomic instructions even if the arguments are equal.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18156
llvm-svn: 263719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were being too aggressive in trying to combine a shuffle into a blend-with-zero pattern, often resulting in a endless loop of contrasting combines
This patch stops the combine if we already have a blend in place (means we miss some domain corrections)
llvm-svn: 263717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The two changes together weakened the test and caused a regression with division
handling in MSVC mode. They were applied to avoid an assertion being triggered
in the block frequency analysis. However, the underlying problem was simply
being masked rather than solved properly. Address the actual underlying problem
and revert the changes. Rather than analyze the cause of the assertion, the
division failure was assumed to be an overflow.
The underlying issue was a subtle bug in the BB construction in the emission of
the div-by-zero check (WIN__DBZCHK). We did not construct the proper successor
information in the basic blocks, nor did we update the PHIs associated with the
basic block when we split them. This would result in assertions being triggered
in the block frequency analysis pass.
Although the original tests are being removed, the tests themselves performed
very little in terms of validation but merely tested that we did not assert when
generating code. Update this with new tests that actually ensure that we do not
regress on the code generation.
llvm-svn: 263714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
That allows, for example, to print hex-formatted immediates using
llvm-objdump --print-imm-hex command line option.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18195
llvm-svn: 263704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
warnings, NFC
Summary:
This should eliminate all occurrences of this within LLVMMipsAsmParser.
This patch is in response to http://reviews.llvm.org/D17983. I was unable
to reproduce the warnings on my machine so please advise if this fixes the
warnings.
Reviewers: ariccio, vkalintiris, dsanders
Subscribers: dblaikie, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18087
llvm-svn: 263703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Rename getATOMIC to getSYNC, as llvm will soon be able to emit both
'__sync' libcalls and '__atomic' libcalls, and this function is for
the '__sync' ones.
- getInsertFencesForAtomic() has been replaced with
shouldInsertFencesForAtomic(Instruction), so that the decision can be
made per-instruction. This functionality will be used soon.
- emitLeadingFence/emitTrailingFence are no longer called if
shouldInsertFencesForAtomic returns false, and thus don't need to
check the condition themselves.
llvm-svn: 263665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Uniform loops where the branch leaving the loop is predicated on VCCNZ
must be skipped if EXEC = 0, otherwise they will be infinite.
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18137
llvm-svn: 263658
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
have been appended to the end.
llvm-svn: 263657
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 263646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
And emit an error if it fails.
This prevents illegal instructions from getting sent to the GPU, which
would potentially result in a hang.
This is a candidate for the stable branch(es).
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 263627
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 263626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
512bit vector because PCMPGT supported only for 128/256bit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18204
llvm-svn: 263624
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similarly to what was done for TLSCALL in r263515.
llvm-svn: 263564
|