| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202624
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202621
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202618
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
with %fcc1-%fcc3 conditional registers.
llvm-svn: 202616
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
conditional registers as input.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 202614
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202610
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202604
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202602
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This generalizes the code to eliminate extra truncs/exts around i1 bit
operations to also do the same on PPC64 for i32 bit operations. This eliminates
a fairly prevalent code wart:
int foo(int a) {
return a == 5 ? 7 : 8;
}
On PPC64, because of the extension implied by the ABI, this would generate:
cmplwi 0, 3, 5
li 12, 8
li 4, 7
isel 3, 4, 12, 2
rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32
blr
where the 'rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32', the extension, is completely unnecessary. At
least for the single-BB case (which is all that the DAG combine mechanism can
handle), this unnecessary extension is no longer generated.
llvm-svn: 202600
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202599
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202598
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202597
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of boilerplate.
No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 202588
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202581
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
disassembler.
llvm-svn: 202578
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202577
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202575
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
filling with zeroes.
llvm-svn: 202572
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202571
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202565
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202564
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
readability of the generated code.
llvm-svn: 202563
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make a call to R600's implementation of verifyInstruction() to
check that instructions are only using legal operands.
llvm-svn: 202544
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202543
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202526
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202523
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202521
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202518
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
X86Operand is extracted into individual header, because it allows to create an
arbitrary memory operand and append it to MCInst. It'll be reused in X86 inline
assembly instrumentation.
Patch by Yuri Gorshenin.
llvm-svn: 202496
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202483
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202482
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Align targets of indirect jumps to instruction bundle boundaries (in MI layer).
* Add masking instructions before indirect jumps (in MC layer).
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2847
llvm-svn: 202479
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The PPC isel instruction can fold 0 into the first operand (thus eliminating
the need to materialize a zero-containing register when the 'true' result of
the isel is 0). When the isel is fed by a bit register operation that we can
invert, do so as part of the bit-register-operation peephole routine.
llvm-svn: 202469
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The CR bit tracking code broke PPC/Darwin; trying to get it working again...
(the darwin11 builder, which defaults to the darwin ABI when running PPC tests,
asserted when running test/CodeGen/PowerPC/inverted-bool-compares.ll)
llvm-svn: 202459
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Cannot use negative numbers in case statements without running afoul of -Wc++11-narrowing.
llvm-svn: 202455
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:
- Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
boolean values).
- Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
are accounted for).
- On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.
Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).
This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.
It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).
POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown
llvm-svn: 202451
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a temporary workaround for native arm linux builds:
PR18996: Changing regalloc order breaks "lencod" on native arm linux builds.
llvm-svn: 202433
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
expensive libcall. Also, Qp_neg is not implemented on at least
FreeBSD. This is also what gcc is doing.
llvm-svn: 202422
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
scan the register file for sub- and super-registers.
No functionality change intended.
(Tests are updated because the comments in the assembler output are
different.)
llvm-svn: 202416
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a function returns a large struct by value return the first 4 words
in registers and the rest on the stack in a location reserved by the
caller. This is needed to support the xC language which supports
functions returning an arbitrary number of return values. This is
r202397 reapplied with a fix to avoid an uninitialized read of a member.
llvm-svn: 202414
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
No functionality change. This is r202396 reapplied with no changes.
llvm-svn: 202413
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We moved MCJIT to use native object formats a long time ago and R600
now uses ELF, so it was dead.
llvm-svn: 202408
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
These are causing test failures, revert for now.
llvm-svn: 202398
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If a function returns a large struct by value return the first 4 words
in registers and the rest on the stack in a location reserved by the
caller. This is needed to support the xC language which supports
functions returning an arbitrary number of return values.
Reviewers: robertlytton
Reviewed By: robertlytton
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2889
llvm-svn: 202397
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 202396
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If the src, dst and size of a memcpy are known to be 4 byte aligned we
can call __memcpy_4() instead of memcpy().
Reviewers: robertlytton
Reviewed By: robertlytton
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2871
llvm-svn: 202395
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These instructions ignore the high bits of one of their input operands -
try and use this to simplify the code.
llvm-svn: 202394
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202393
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202348
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 202347
|