| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Intrinsic has incorrect argument type!
i32 (i32*)* @llvm.setjmp
*wipes tear*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
avx512vl. Similar for vXi64 on avx512dq without avx512vl.
Summary:
Previously we did this with isel patterns that used garbage in
the widened part of the source. But that's not valid for strictfp.
So now we custom widen and use zeroes for the widened elemens for
strictfp.
This replaces D71864.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, andrew.w.kaylor, pengfei, LiuChen3
Reviewed By: pengfei
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71879
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For non-strict, generic type legalization will take care of this,
but that doesn't happen currently for strict nodes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
i686-pc-windows-msvc to match what we do for non-strict.
The float libcalls are inlined in MSVC's math header where they
just cast to double and use the double libcall. Do the same when
we emit libcalls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I believe the algorithm we use for non-strict is exception safe
for strict. The fsub won't generate any exceptions. After it we
will have an exact version of the i32 integer in a double. Then
we just round it to f32. That rounding will generate a precision
exception if it can't be represented exactly.
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71892
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
avx512vl. Similar for vXi64 sint_to_fp/uint_to_fp on avx512dq without avx512vl.
Previously we widened these through isel patterns, but that
didn't work for STRICT_ nodes. Those need to be padded with
zeroes in the upper bits which is harder to do in isel patterns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
but not AVX512VL.
Previously we were widening with isel patterns, but that wasn't
exception safe for strict FP. So now we widen to v4i32->v4f64
during type legalization. And then let op legalization further
widen to v8i32->v8f64.
The vec_int_to_fp.ll changes are caused by us no longer narrowing
extracts of strict_uint_to_fp to the v4i32->v2f64 instruction
without AVX512VL only to have isel rewiden it. Now we just keep
it wide throughout. So we don't have an opportunity to narrow
the load.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
but not avx512vl.
AVX512F added instruction for vector fp_to_uint conversions. With
AVX512VL we can use a specific instruction that does v2f64->v4i32 with
zeroes in the 2 extra elements. For non-strict nodes without AVX512VL
we relied on type legalization to turn it to v4f64->v4i32 which would
later be widened by op legalization to v8f64->v8i32. But type legalization
doesn't currently widen strict nodes since it doesn't know how to
safely and efficiently pad the extra elements. But for X86 we know
padding with zeroes is safe and efficient so do that ourselves.
|
|
|
|
| |
the AVX512DQ+AVX512VL code is very similar in both. NFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
strict_sint_to_fp/strict_uint_to_fp for avx512dq+avx512vl targets.
With avx512dq+avx512vl we have instruction that implements this and
places zeroes in the upper 64-bits of the destination xmm register.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Enable STRICT_SINT_TO_FP/STRICT_UINT_TO_FP on X86 backend
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, LiuChen3, uweigand, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, LuoYuanke
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2i1->v2f64 on targets with AVX512F, but not AVX512VL.
In the worst case, this requires a 128-bit move instruction to
implicitly zero the upper bits. In the common case, we should
recognize the producing instruction already zeroed the upper bits.
|
|
|
|
| |
STRICT_CVTTP2SI/STRICT_CVTTP2UI nodes. NFC
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
targets with avx512dq and avx512vl instructions.
On 32-bit targets we can't use the scalar instruction so we
insert the scalar into a vector and use packed conversions.
Previously we used either v4f32->v4i64 or v4f64->v4i64 to avoid
some complexity creating target specific ISD opcodes for
v4f32->v2i64. But this causes extra vzeroupper instructions and
possibly frequency throttling on Intel CPUs.
This patch changes this to create a 128-bit vector and uses a
target specific ISD opcode if needed.
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix several several additional problems with the int <-> FP conversion
logic both in common code and in the X86 target. In particular:
- The STRICT_FP_TO_UINT expansion emits a floating-point compare. This
compare can raise exceptions and therefore needs to be a strict compare.
I've made it signaling (even though quiet would also be correct) as
signaling is the more usual default for an LT. This code exists both
in common code and in the X86 target.
- The STRICT_UINT_TO_FP expansion algorithm was incorrect for strict mode:
it emitted two STRICT_SINT_TO_FP nodes and then used a select to choose one
of the results. This can cause spurious exceptions by the STRICT_SINT_TO_FP
that ends up not chosen. I've fixed the algorithm to use only a single
STRICT_SINT_TO_FP instead.
- The !isStrictFPEnabled logic in DoInstructionSelection would sometimes do
the wrong thing because it calls getOperationAction using the result VT.
But for some opcodes, incuding [SU]INT_TO_FP, getOperationAction needs to
be called using the operand VT.
- Remove some (obsolete) code in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select that would mutate
STRICT_FP_TO_[SU]INT to non-strict versions unnecessarily.
Reviewed by: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
extract_subvector(bitcast()) support
This moves the X86 specific transform from rL364407
into DAGCombiner to generically handle 'little to big' cases
(for example: extract_subvector(v2i64 bitcast(v16i8))). This
allows us to remove both the x86 implementation and the aarch64
bitcast(extract_subvector(bitcast())) combine.
Earlier patches that dealt with regressions initially exposed
by this patch:
rG5e5e99c041e4
rG0b38af89e2c0
Patch by: @RKSimon (Simon Pilgrim)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
before a later use.
The setcc operands are copied into LHS and RHS variables at the top of the function. We also capture the condition code.
A later piece of code swaps the operands and changing the CC variable as part of a canonicalization to make some other checks simpler. But we might not make the transform we canonicalized for. So we continue on through the function where we can use the swapped LHS/RHS variables and access the original condition code operand instead of the modified CC variable. This leads to a setcc being created with the original condition code, but with swapped operands.
To mitigate this, this patch does a couple things. The LHS/RHS/CC variables are made const to keep them from being modified like this again. The transform that needs the swap now uses temporary copies of the variables. And the transform that used the original condition code operand has been altered to use the CC variable we cached originally. Either of these changes are enough to fix the issue, but doing both to make this code very safe.
I also considered rewriting the swap code in some way to check both permutations without explicitly swapping or needing temporary variables, but held off on that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for STRICT_FCMP. NFCI
The only thing its getting from the X86TargetLowering class is
the subtarget which we can easily pass. This function only has
one call site now since this might help the compiler inline it.
Explicitly return both the flag result and the chain result for
STRICT_FCMP nodes. This removes an assumption in the caller that
getValue(1) is the right way to get the chain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constant and calling EmitCmp. NFCI
EmitCmp will just immediately call EmitTest and discard the null
constant only to have EmitTest create it again if it doesn't fold.
So just skip all that and go directly to EmitTest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch is mainly for custom lowering the vector operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Add strict fma support
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, LiuChen3
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, LuoYuanke
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71604
|
|
|
|
| |
improve readability. NFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of integers to floating point.
This includes some of Craig Topper's changes for promotion support from
D71130.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The use of a boolean isInteger flag (generally initialized using
VT.isInteger()) caused errors in our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project).
In our backend, pointers use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR) and therefore
.isInteger() returns false. This meant that getSetCCInverse() was using the
floating-point variant and generated incorrect code for us:
`(void *)0x12033091e < (void *)0xffffffffffffffff` would return false.
Committing this change will significantly reduce our merge conflicts
for each upstream merge.
Reviewers: spatel, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: wuzish, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
from getNegatedExpression()"
This reverts commit d1f0bdf2d2df9bdf11ee2ddfff3df50e53f2f042.
The patch can cause infinite loops in DAGCombiner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getNegatedExpression()
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets
to show the problem more generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some
value is free to negate, but that use count can change as we
rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression(). So something
that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation
phase becomes not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or
the inverse - something that was not free becomes free).
This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that
everything in an expression that is negatible to be handled
in the corresponding code within getNegatedExpression().
This patch skips the use check during the rewrite phase.
So we determine that some expression isNegatibleForFree
(identically to without this patch), but during the rewrite,
don't rely on use counts to decide how to create the optimal
expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
under min-legal-vector-width=256
This is an improvement to 88dacbd43625cf7aad8a01c0c3b92142c4dc0970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This is a follow up of D69281, it enables the X86 backend support for the FP comparision.
Reviewers: uweigand, kpn, craig.topper, RKSimon, cameron.mcinally, andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke, LiuChen3
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
min-legal-vector-width=256. Scalarize v64i1 arguments and shuffles under min-legal-vector-width=256.
This reverts 3e1aee2ba717529b651a79ed4fc7e7147358043f in favor
of a different approach.
Scalarizing isn't great codegen, but making the type illegal was
interfering with k constraint in inline assembly.
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The xor'ing behaviour is only used for msvc/crt environments, when we're targeting
macho the guard load code doesn't know about the xor in the epilog. Disable xor'ing
when targeting win32-macho to be consistent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
D53794 introduced code to perform the FP_TO_UINT expansion via FP_TO_SINT in a way that would never expose floating-point exceptions in the intermediate steps. Unfortunately, I just noticed there is still a way this can happen. As discussed in D53794, the compiler now generates this sequence:
// Sel = Src < 0x8000000000000000
// Val = select Sel, Src, Src - 0x8000000000000000
// Ofs = select Sel, 0, 0x8000000000000000
// Result = fp_to_sint(Val) ^ Ofs
The problem is with the Src - 0x8000000000000000 expression. As I mentioned in the original review, that expression can never overflow or underflow if the original value is in range for FP_TO_UINT. But I missed that we can get an Inexact exception in the case where Src is a very small positive value. (In this case the result of the sub is ignored, but that doesn't help.)
Instead, I'd suggest to use the following sequence:
// Sel = Src < 0x8000000000000000
// FltOfs = select Sel, 0, 0x8000000000000000
// IntOfs = select Sel, 0, 0x8000000000000000
// Result = fp_to_sint(Val - FltOfs) ^ IntOfs
In the case where the value is already in range of FP_TO_SINT, we now simply compute Val - 0, which now definitely cannot trap (unless Val is a NaN in which case we'd want to trap anyway).
In the case where the value is not in range of FP_TO_SINT, but still in range of FP_TO_UINT, the sub can never be inexact, as Val is between 2^(n-1) and (2^n)-1, i.e. always has the 2^(n-1) bit set, and the sub is always simply clearing that bit.
There is a slight complication in the case where Val is a constant, so we know at compile time whether Sel is true or false. In that scenario, the old code would automatically optimize the sub away, while this no longer happens with the new code. Instead, I've added extra code to check for this case and then just fall back to FP_TO_SINT directly. (This seems to catch even slightly more cases.)
Original version of the patch by Ulrich Weigand. X86 changes added by Craig Topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
musttail calls should not require allocating extra stack for arguments.
Updates to arguments passed in memory should happen in place before the
epilogue.
This bug was mostly a missed optimization, unless inalloca was used and
store to push conversion fired.
If a reserved call frame was used for an inalloca musttail call, the
call setup and teardown instructions would be deleted, and SP
adjustments would be inserted in the prologue and epilogue. You can see
these are removed from several test cases in this change.
In the case where the stack frame was not reserved, i.e. call frame
optimization fires and turns argument stores into pushes, then the
imbalanced call frame setup instructions created for inalloca calls
become a problem. They remain in the instruction stream, resulting in a
call setup that allocates zero bytes (expected for inalloca), and a call
teardown that deallocates the inalloca pack. This deallocation was
unbalanced, leading to subsequent crashes.
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
explicitly return the chain instead of calling getValue on the single SDValue.
We shouldn't assume that the returned result can be used to get
the other result.
This is prep-work for strict FP where we will also need to pass
the chain result along in more cases.
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I suspect this became unnecessary after r354161. Prior to that
we may have been going through the default expansion of FP_TO_UINT
on 64-bit targets and then ending up back in Custom X86 handling
to handle the FP_TO_SINT for it. Now we just Custom handle the
FP_TO_UINT directly. We already need to handle it for 32-bit mode
during type legalization so we wouldn't save any code by using
the default expansion on 64-bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This follows a previous patch that changes the X86 datalayout to represent
mixed size pointers (32-bit sext, 32-bit zext, and 64-bit) with address spaces
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D64931)
This patch implements the address space cast lowering to the corresponding
sign extension, zero extension, or truncate instructions.
Related to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42359
Reviewers: rnk, craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69639
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the following patch of D68854.
This patch adds basic operations of X87 instructions, including +, -, *, / , fp extensions and fp truncations.
Patch by Chen Liu(LiuChen3)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MVE has a basic symmetry between it's normal loads/store operations and
the masked variants. This means that masked loads and stores can use
pre-inc and post-inc addressing modes, just like the standard loads and
stores already do.
To enable that, this patch adds all the relevant infrastructure for
treating masked loads/stores addressing modes in the same way as normal
loads/stores.
This involves:
- Adding an AddressingMode to MaskedLoadStoreSDNode, along with an extra
Offset operand that is added after the PtrBase.
- Extending the IndexedModeActions from 8bits to 16bits to store the
legality of masked operations as well as normal ones. This array is
fairly small, so doubling the size still won't make it very large.
Offset masked loads can then be controlled with
setIndexedMaskedLoadAction, similar to standard loads.
- The same methods that combine to indexed loads, such as
CombineToPostIndexedLoadStore, are adjusted to handle masked loads in
the same way.
- The ARM backend is then adjusted to make use of these indexed masked
loads/stores.
- The X86 backend is adjusted to hopefully be no functional changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Returning SDValue() means we didn't handle it and the common
code should try to expand it. But its a target intrinsic so
expanding won't do anything and just leave the node alone. But
it will print confusing debug messages.
By returning Op we tell the common code that the node is legal
and shouldn't receive any further processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
f32/f64/f80 in 64-bit mode.
These need to emit a libcall like we do for the non-strict version.
32-bit mode needs to SoftenFloat support to be implemented for strict FP nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70504
|
|
|
|
| |
Avoid MVT dependency which will be needed in a future patch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add explicit setOperation actions for some to match their none
strict counterparts. This isn't required, but makes the code
self documenting that we didn't forget about strict fp. I've
used LibCall instead of Expand since that's more explicitly what
we want.
Only lrint/llrint/lround/llround are missing now.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Expand code would fall back to LibCall, but this makes it
more explicit.
|