| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16793
llvm-svn: 259539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes the code path that generate "synchronous" (only correct at call site) CFA.
We will probably want to re-introduce it once we are capable of emitting different
.eh_frame and .debug_frame sections.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14948
llvm-svn: 254874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When push instructions are being used to pass function arguments on
the stack, and either EH or debugging are enabled, we need to generate
.cfi_adjust_cfa_offset directives appropriately. For (synch) EH, it is
enough for the CFA offset to be correct at every call site, while
for debugging we want to be correct after every push.
Darwin does not support this well, so don't use pushes whenever it
would be required.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13767
llvm-svn: 251904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We emit 1 compact unwind encoding per function, and this can’t represent
the varying stack pointer that will be generated by X86CallFrameOptimization.
Disable the optimization on Darwin.
(It might be possible to split the function into multiple ranges
and emit 1 compact unwind info per range. The compact unwind emission
code isn’t ready for that and this kind of info certainly isn’t
tested/used anywhere. It might be worth exploring this path if we want
to get the space savings at some point though)
llvm-svn: 249694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
x86 call frame optimization
Patch by Dave Kreitzer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12620
llvm-svn: 247042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This abstracts away the test for "when can we fold across a MachineInstruction"
into the the MI interface, and changes call-frame optimization use the same test
the peephole optimizer users.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11945
llvm-svn: 244729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The SP was always unconditionally assigned to later, but initialised early.
This delays the initialisation, and avoids the dead store. Identified by
clang static analysis. No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 244423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Create wrapper methods in the Function class for the OptimizeForSize and MinSize
attributes. We want to hide the logic of "or'ing" them together when optimizing
just for size (-Os).
Currently, we are not consistent about this and rely on a front-end to always set
OptimizeForSize (-Os) if MinSize (-Oz) is on. Thus, there are 18 FIXME changes here
that should be added as follow-on patches with regression tests.
This patch is NFC-intended: it just replaces existing direct accesses of the attributes
by the equivalent wrapper call.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11734
llvm-svn: 243994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Eugene Zelenko!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11400
llvm-svn: 242930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for argument passing"
This allows more call sequences to use pushes instead of movs when optimizing for size.
In particular, calling conventions that pass some parameters in registers (e.g. thiscall) are now supported.
This should no longer cause miscompiles, now that a bug in emitPrologue was fixed in r242395.
llvm-svn: 242398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
argument passing"
It miscompiles some code and a reduced test case has been sent to the
author.
This reverts commit r240257.
llvm-svn: 242373
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently, the style needs to be agreed upon first.
llvm-svn: 240390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows more call sequences to use pushes instead of movs when optimizing for size.
In particular, calling conventions that pass some parameters in registers (e.g. thiscall) are now supported.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10500
llvm-svn: 240257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was previously returning int. However there are no negative opcode
numbers and more importantly this was needlessly different from
MCInstrDesc::getOpcode() (which even is the value returned here) and
SDValue::getOpcode()/SDNode::getOpcode().
llvm-svn: 237611
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
doing a lookup on the TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 229995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Canonicalize access to function attributes to use the simpler API.
getAttributes().getAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> getFnAttribute(Kind)
getAttributes().hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> hasFnAttribute(Kind)
llvm-svn: 229214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a push
Since we track esp precisely, there's no reason not to allow this.
llvm-svn: 228924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
parameter movs to pushes
This gives a rough estimate of whether using pushes instead of movs is profitable, in terms of size.
We go over all calls in the MachineFunction and compute:
a) For each callsite that can not use pushes, the penalty of not having a reserved call frame.
b) For each callsite that can use pushes, the gain of actually replacing the movs with pushes (and the potential penalty of having to readjust the stack).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7561
llvm-svn: 228915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
optimization
This splits collecting information from actually performing the transformation, so that we can add a heuristic in between the two.
NFC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7497
llvm-svn: 228817
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 228410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.
(Re-commit of r227728)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789
llvm-svn: 227752
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 227746
|
|
This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789
llvm-svn: 227728
|