| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch fixes clang-tidy warnings on wasm-only files.
The list of checks used is:
`-*,clang-diagnostic-*,llvm-*,misc-*,-misc-unused-parameters,readability-identifier-naming,modernize-*`
(LLVM's default .clang-tidy list is the same except it does not have
`modernize-*`. But I've seen in multiple CLs in LLVM the modernize style
was recommended and code was fixed based on the style, so I added it as
well.)
The common fixes are:
- Variable names start with an uppercase letter
- Function names start with a lowercase letter
- Use `auto` when you use casts so the type is evident
- Use inline initialization for class member variables
- Use `= default` for empty constructors / destructors
- Use `using` in place of `typedef`
Reviewers: sbc100, tlively, aardappel
Subscribers: dschuff, sunfish, jgravelle-google, yurydelendik, kripken, MatzeB, mgorny, rupprecht, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57500
llvm-svn: 353075
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
|
Summary:
StoreResults pass does not optimize store instructions anymore because
store instructions don't return results values anymore. Now this pass is
used solely for memory intrinsics, so update the pass name accordingly
and fix outdated pass descriptions as well.
This patch does not change any meaningful behavior, but not marked as
NFC because it changes a comment check line in a test case.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: mgorny, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfiish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56093
llvm-svn: 350669
|
