| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
As discussed, LoopUtils.h is a better name.
llvm-svn: 182314
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that the preheader insertion logic in LoopSimplify is externally exposed,
use it, and remove the copy-and-pasted version.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 182300
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As the pairing of this instruction form with the bdnz/bdz branches is now
enforced by the verification pass, make it clear from the name that these
are used only for counter-based loops.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 182296
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When asserts are enabled, this adds a verification pass for PPC counter-loop
formation. Unfortunately, without sacrificing code quality, there is no better
way of forming counter-based loops except at the (late) IR level. This means
that we need to recognize, at the IR level, anything which might turn into a
function call (or indirect branch). Because this is currently a finite set of
things, and because SelectionDAG lowering is basic-block local, this can be
done. Nevertheless, it is fragile, and failure results in a miscompile. This
verification pass checks that all (reachable) counter-based branches are
dominated by a loop mtctr instruction, and that no instructions in between
clobber the counter register. If these conditions are not satisfied, then an
ICE will be triggered.
In short, this is to help us sleep better at night.
llvm-svn: 182295
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't need to reject all inline asm as using the counter register (most does
not). Only those that explicitly clobber the counter register need to prevent
the transformation.
llvm-svn: 182191
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some IR-level instructions (such as FP <-> i64 conversions) are not chained
w.r.t. the mtctr intrinsic and yet may become function calls that clobber the
counter register. At the selection-DAG level, these might be reordered with the
mtctr intrinsic causing miscompiles. To avoid this situation, if an existing
preheader has instructions that might use the counter register, create a new
preheader for the mtctr intrinsic. This extra block will be remerged with the
old preheader at the MI level, but will prevent unwanted reordering at the
selection-DAG level.
llvm-svn: 182045
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On PPC32, i64 FP conversions are implemented using runtime calls (which clobber
the counter register). These must be excluded.
llvm-svn: 182023
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Trying to unbreak the VS build by copying some undef code from
Utils/LowerInvoke.cpp.
llvm-svn: 181938
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The old PPCCTRLoops pass, like the Hexagon pass version from which it was
derived, could only handle some simple loops in canonical form. We cannot
directly adapt the new Hexagon hardware loops pass, however, because the
Hexagon pass contains a fundamental assumption that non-constant-trip-count
loops will contain a guard, and this is not always true (the result being that
incorrect negative counts can be generated). With this commit, we replace the
pass with a late IR-level pass which makes use of SE to calculate the
backedge-taken counts and safely generate the loop-count expressions (including
any necessary max() parts). This IR level pass inserts custom intrinsics that
are lowered into the desired decrement-and-branch instructions.
The most fragile part of this new implementation is that interfering uses of
the counter register must be detected on the IR level (and, on PPC, this also
includes any indirect branches in addition to function calls). Also, to make
all of this work, we need a variant of the mtctr instruction that is marked
as having side effects. Without this, machine-code level CSE, DCE, etc.
illegally transform the resulting code. Hopefully, this can be improved
in the future.
This new pass is smaller than the original (and much smaller than the new
Hexagon hardware loops pass), and can handle many additional cases correctly.
In addition, the preheader-creation code has been copied from LoopSimplify, and
after we decide on where it belongs, this code will be refactored so that it
can be explicitly shared (making this implementation even smaller).
The new test-case files ctrloop-{le,lt,ne}.ll have been adapted from tests for
the new Hexagon pass. There are a few classes of loops that this pass does not
transform (noted by FIXMEs in the files), but these deficiencies can be
addressed within the SE infrastructure (thus helping many other passes as well).
llvm-svn: 181927
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks to Jakob for isolating the underlying problem from the
test case in r177423. The original commit had introduced
asymmetric copy operations, but these turned out to be a work-around
to the real problem (the use of == instead of hasSubClassEq in PPCCTRLoops).
llvm-svn: 177679
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't sign extend the immediate value from the OR instruction in
an LIS/OR pair.
llvm-svn: 177361
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 177296
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit fixes an assert that would occur on loops with large constant counts
(like looping for ((uint32_t) -1) iterations on PPC64). The existing code did
not handle counts that it computed to be negative (asserting instead), but
these can be created with valid inputs.
This bug was discovered by bugpoint while I was attempting to isolate a
completely different problem.
Also, in writing test cases for the negative-count problem, I discovered that
the ori/lsi handling was broken (there was a typo which caused the logic that
was supposed to detect these pairs and extract the iteration count to always
fail). This has now also been corrected (and is covered by one of the new test
cases).
llvm-svn: 177295
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because the initial-value constants had not been added to the list
of instructions considered for DCE the resulting code had redundant
constant-materialization instructions.
llvm-svn: 177294
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
via -print-after-all.
llvm-svn: 175058
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way of using getNextOperandForReg() was unlikely to work as
intended. We don't give any guarantees about the order of operands in
the use-def chains, so looking only at operands following a given
operand in the chain doesn't make sense.
llvm-svn: 161542
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This cleans up the method used to find trip counts in order to form CTR loops on PPC.
This refactoring allows the pass to find loops which have a constant trip count but also
happen to end with a comparison to zero. This also adds explicit FIXMEs to mark two different
classes of loops that are currently ignored.
In addition, we now search through all potential induction operations instead of just the first.
Also, we check the predicate code on the conditional branch and abort the transformation if the
code is not EQ or NE, and we then make sure that the branch to be transformed matches the
condition register defined by the comparison (multiple possible comparisons will be considered).
llvm-svn: 158607
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code which tests for an induction operation cannot assume that any
ADDI instruction will have a register operand because the operand could
also be a frame index; for example:
%vreg16<def> = ADDI8 <fi#0>, 0; G8RC:%vreg16
llvm-svn: 158205
|
|
|
CTR-based loop branching code.
This pass is derived from the Hexagon HardwareLoops pass. The only significant enhancement over the Hexagon
pass is that PPCCTRLoops will also attempt to delete the replaced add and compare operations if they are
no longer otherwise used. Also, invalid preheader DebugLoc is not used.
llvm-svn: 158204
|
