| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks
Alexey for pointing them out.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 195064
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class
and a subclass, then the following code:
Base *foo = new Child();
delete foo;
will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe
plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are:
ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 194997
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194865
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows constructing a Mangler with just a TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 193630
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of NVPTXTargetObjectFile. ~NVPTXTargetObjectFile() tries to delete them.
It caused crash on some hosts since r184595.
llvm-svn: 184728
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Hopefully this resolves any outstanding style issues and gives us
an automated way of ensuring we conform to the style guidelines.
llvm-svn: 178415
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 156416
|
|
|
for NVIDIA PTX 3.0. This back-end will (eventually) replace the current PTX back-end, while maintaining compatibility with it.
The new target machines are:
nvptx (old ptx32) => 32-bit PTX
nvptx64 (old ptx64) => 64-bit PTX
The sources are based on the internal NVIDIA NVPTX back-end, and
contain more functionality than the current PTX back-end currently
provides.
NV_CONTRIB
llvm-svn: 156196
|