| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15050
llvm-svn: 254427
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This makes the assembly output look nicer and there is no reason to
have custom strings for these.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14671
llvm-svn: 254426
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
interfaces, and update all uses of old interfaces.
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
probability-based interfaces, and update all uses of old interfaces."
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Justin Lebar
llvm-svn: 254362
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
interfaces, and update all uses of old interfaces.
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 254333
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 254332
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we know we have stack objects, we reserve the registers
that the private buffer resource and wave offset are passed
and use them directly.
If not, reserve the last 5 SGPRs just in case we need to spill.
After register allocation, try to pick the next available registers
instead of the last SGPRs, and then insert copies from the inputs
to the reserved registers in the progloue.
This also only selectively enables all of the input registers
which are really required instead of always enabling them.
llvm-svn: 254331
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 254330
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It does not work because of emergency stack slots.
This pass was supposed to eliminate dummy registers for the
spill instructions, but the register scavenger can introduce
more during PrologEpilogInserter, so some would end up
left behind if they were needed.
The potential for spilling the scratch resource descriptor
and offset register makes doing something like this
overly complicated. Reserve registers to use for the resource
descriptor and use them directly in eliminateFrameIndex.
Also removes creating another scratch resource descriptor
when directly selecting scratch MUBUF instructions.
The choice of which registers are reserved is temporary.
For now it attempts to pick the next available registers
after the user and system SGPRs.
llvm-svn: 254329
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 254328
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This hasn't been doing anything since using relocations was added.
llvm-svn: 254304
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This returns a pointer to the dispatch packet, which can be used to load
information about the kernel dispach.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14898
llvm-svn: 254116
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2: added more tests, moved the SALU->VALU conversion to a separate function
It looks like it's not possible to get subregisters in the S_ABS lowering
code, and I don't feel like guessing without testing what the correct code
would look like.
llvm-svn: 254095
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 254091
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They can be loaded and stored, so count them as legal. This is
mostly to fix a number of common cases for load/store merging.
llvm-svn: 254086
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Many target lowerings copy-paste the code to test SDValues for known constants.
This code can instead be shared in SelectionDAG.cpp, and reused in the targets.
Reviewers: MatzeB, andreadb, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14945
llvm-svn: 254085
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
If properly aligned this could allow using ds_read_b64.
llvm-svn: 253975
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The one regression in the builtin tests is in the read2 test which now
(again) has many extra copies, but this should be solved once the pass
is replaced with a DAG combine.
llvm-svn: 253974
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r253511.
This likely broke the bots in
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/20202
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-3stage-i686-linux/builds/3787
llvm-svn: 253543
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe. For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)
For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
(call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
$1i1 false)
and similarly for memmove and memcpy.
I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.
A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.
In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added. Instead of calling:
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool. This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.
Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen. I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253511
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MCRelaxableFragment previously kept a copy of MCSubtargetInfo and
MCInst to enable re-encoding the MCInst later during relaxation. A copy
of MCSubtargetInfo (instead of a reference or pointer) was needed
because the feature bits could be modified by the parser.
This commit replaces the MCSubtargetInfo copy in MCRelaxableFragment
with a constant reference to MCSubtargetInfo. The copies of
MCSubtargetInfo are kept in MCContext, and the target parsers are now
responsible for asking MCContext to provide a copy whenever the feature
bits of MCSubtargetInfo have to be toggled.
With this patch, I saw a 4% reduction in peak memory usage when I
compiled verify-uselistorder.lto.bc using llc.
rdar://problem/21736951
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14346
llvm-svn: 253127
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MCSubtargetInfo in the subclasses into MCTargetAsmParser and define a
member function getSTI.
This is done in preparation for making changes to shrink the size of
MCRelaxableFragment. (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D14346).
llvm-svn: 253124
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by: Alex Deucher
llvm-svn: 253053
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r252565.
This also includes the revert of the commit mentioned below in order to
avoid breaking tests in AMDGPU:
Revert "AMDGPU: Set isAllocatable = 0 on VS_32/VS_64"
This reverts commit r252674.
llvm-svn: 252956
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252677
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252675
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252674
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Pass the VOPProfile object all the through to *_m multiclasses. This will
allow us to do more simplifications in the future.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13437
llvm-svn: 252339
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252328
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Test has a bogus verifier error which will be fixed by later commits.
llvm-svn: 252327
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The SGPR spill pseudos don't actually use them.
llvm-svn: 252324
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mark kernels that use certain features that require user
SGPRs to support with kernel attributes. We need to know
before instruction selection begins because it impacts
the kernel calling convention lowering.
For now this only detects the workitem intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 252323
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of forcing 4 alignment when spilled, set register class
alignments.
llvm-svn: 252322
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For some reason VS_32 ends up factoring into the pressure heuristics
even though we should never see a virtual register with this class.
When SGPRs are reserved for register spilling, this for some reason
triggers reg-crit scheduling.
Setting isAllocatable = 0 may help with this since that seems to remove
it from the default implementation's generated table.
llvm-svn: 252321
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13804
llvm-svn: 252291
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252145
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This doesn't quite match how SC prints it, which doesn't put it in a
comment.
llvm-svn: 252144
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252142
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The operand layout is slightly different for the atomic
opcodes from the usual MUBUF loads and stores.
This should only fix it on SI/CI. VI is still broken
because it still emits the addr64 replacement.
llvm-svn: 252140
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vaddr comes before srsrc in every other MUBUF instruction,
and is the order it is printed.
llvm-svn: 252139
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252116
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The printed name and the parsed assembler names weren't the same.
I'm not sure which name SC prints these as, but I think it's this one.
llvm-svn: 252010
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the requested SGPR was not actually aligned, it was
accepted and rounded down instead of rejected.
Also fix an assert if the range is an invalid size.
llvm-svn: 252009
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
If trying to use one past the end, this would assert.
llvm-svn: 252008
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 252000
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are actually 104 so 2 were missing.
More assembler tests with high register number tuples
will be included in later patches.
llvm-svn: 251999
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Add more comments etc.
llvm-svn: 251996
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251995
|