| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a little embarrassing.
When I reverted r261504 (getIterator() => getInstrIterator()) in
r261567, I did a `git grep` to see if there were new calls to
`getInstrIterator()` that I needed to migrate. There were 10-20 hits,
and I blindly did a `sed ...` before calling `ninja check`.
However, these were `MachineInstrBundleIterator::getInstrIterator()`,
which predated r261567. Perhaps coincidentally, these had an identical
name and return type.
This commit undoes my careless sed and restores
`MachineBasicBlock::iterator::getInstrIterator()`.
llvm-svn: 261577
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r261504, since it's not obvious the new name is
better:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160222/334298.html
I'll recommit if we get consensus that it's the right direction.
llvm-svn: 261567
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 257804
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
One of the changes in lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUMCInstLower.cpp was a new
one. Previously, bundle iterators and single-instruction iterators
could be compared to each other (comparing on underlying pointers).
I changed a comparison from using `MBB->end()` to using
`MBB->instr_end()`, since both end iterators should point at the some
place anyway.
I don't think the implicit conversion between the two iterator types is
a good idea since it's fairly easy to accidentally compare to the wrong
thing (they aren't always end iterators). Otherwise I would have just
added the conversion.
Even with that, no there should be functionality change here.
llvm-svn: 250218
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 239657
|
