| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
writer. NFCI.
With this we gain a little flexibility in how the generic object
writer is created.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47045
llvm-svn: 332868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MCObjectWriter. NFCI.
To make this work I needed to add an endianness field to MCAsmBackend
so that writeNopData() implementations know which endianness to use.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47035
llvm-svn: 332857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provide some free functions to reduce verbosity of endian-writing
a single value, and replace the endianness template parameter with
a field.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47032
llvm-svn: 332757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NFCI.
The idea is that a client that wants split dwarf would create a
specific kind of object writer that creates two files, and use it to
create the streamer.
Part of PR37466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47050
llvm-svn: 332749
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46356
llvm-svn: 332713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Counting the number of instructions is both unintuitive and inaccurate.
On AArch64, this only affects the generated remarks and certain rare
pseudo-instructions, but it will have a bigger impact on other targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46921
llvm-svn: 332685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
store instructions.
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46680
llvm-svn: 332584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This breaks the code which saves and restores LR, so we can't outline
without doing something more complicated for stack adjustment.
Found by inspection; we get lucky in most cases because getMemOpInfo
only handles STRWpost, not any other pre/post-increment forms. But it
hits a couple of artificial testcases in the tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46920
llvm-svn: 332529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The cost computation assumes we do this correctly, but the actual
lowering was wrong.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46923
llvm-svn: 332514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For regular SVE vector operands, this patch introduces a more
sensible diagnostic when the vector has a wrong suffix (e.g. z0.s vs z0.b).
For example:
add z0.s, z1.s, z2.b -> invalid element width
^_____^
mismatch
For the vector-with-shift/extend (e.g. z0.s, uxtw #2) this patch takes
a slightly different approach and instead returns a 'invalid operand'
if the element size is not as expected. This is because the diagnostics
are more specificied to suggest using the right shift/extend suffix. This
is a trade-off not to introduce more operand classes and still provide
useful diagnostics for LD1 and PRF instructions.
For example:
ld1w z1.s, p0/z, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].s, (uxtw|sxtw)'
ld1w z1.d, p0/z, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid operand
^________________^
mismatch
For gather prefetches, both 'z0.s' and 'z0.d' would be allowed:
prfw #0, p0, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].s, (uxtw|sxtw) #2'
prfw #0, p0, [x0, z0.d] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].d, (lsl|uxtw|sxtw) #2'
Without this change, the diagnostic would unnecessarily suggest a
different element size:
prfw #0, p0, [x0, z0.s] -> invalid shift/extend specified, expected 'z[0..31].d, (lsl|uxtw|sxtw) #2'
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, aemerson, fhahn, samparker, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46688
llvm-svn: 332483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Keep loads and stores together (target defines how many loads
and stores to gang up), such that it will help in pairing
and vectorization.
Differential Revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D46477
llvm-svn: 332482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46686
llvm-svn: 332472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We currently handle all aggregates by creating one large LLT, and letting the
legalizer deal with splitting them up. However using this approach means that
we can't support big endian code correctly.
This patch changes the way that the IRTranslator deals with aggregate values,
by splitting them up into their constituent element values. To do this, parts
of the translator need to be modified to deal with multiple VRegs for a single
Value.
A new Value to VReg mapper is introduced to help keep compile time under
control, currently there is no measurable impact on CTMark despite the extra
code being generated in some cases.
Patch is based on the original work of Tim Northover.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46018
llvm-svn: 332449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch re-introduces the "S" inline assembler constraint. This matches
an absolute symbolic address or a label reference. The primary use case is
asm("adrp %0, %1\n\t"
"add %0, %0, :lo12:%1" : "=r"(addr) : "S"(&var));
I say re-introduces as it seems like "S" was implemented in the original
AArch64 backend, but it looks like it wasn't carried forward to the merged
backend. The original implementation had A and L modifiers that could be
used to print ":lo12:" to the string. It looks like gcc doesn't use these
and :lo12: is expected to be written in the inline assembly string so I've
not implemented A and L. Clang already supports the S modifier.
Fixes PR37180
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46745
llvm-svn: 332444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
load instructions.
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46679
llvm-svn: 332442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46682
llvm-svn: 332433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When storing the 0th lane of a vector, use a simpler and usually more
efficient scalar store instead. In this case, also using the unscaled
offset.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46762
llvm-svn: 332394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When storing the 0th lane of a vector, use a simpler and usually more efficient scalar store instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46655
llvm-svn: 332251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46681
llvm-svn: 332234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
performPostLD1Combine in AArch64ISelLowering looks for vector
insert_vector_elt of a loaded value which it can optimize into a single
LD1LANE instruction. The code checking for the pattern was not checking
if the lane index was a constant which could cause two problems:
- an assert when lowering the LD1LANE ISD node since it assumes an
constant operand
- an assert in isel if the lane index value depends on the
post-incremented base register
Both of these issues are avoided by simply checking that the lane index
is a constant.
Fixes bug 35822.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, javed.absar
Subscribers: rengolin, kristof.beyls, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46591
llvm-svn: 332103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Accessing the members of a large data structures needs a lot of GEPs which
usually have large offsets due to the size of the underlying data structure. If
the offsets are too large to fit into the r+i addressing mode, these GEPs cannot
be sunk to their users' blocks and many extra registers are needed then to carry
the values of these GEPs.
This patch tries to split a large data struct starting from %base like the
following.
Before:
BB0:
%base =
BB1:
%gep0 = gep %base, off0
%gep1 = gep %base, off1
%gep2 = gep %base, off2
BB2:
%load1 = load %gep0
%load2 = load %gep1
%load3 = load %gep2
After:
BB0:
%base =
%new_base = gep %base, off0
BB1:
%new_gep0 = %new_base
%new_gep1 = gep %new_base, off1 - off0
%new_gep2 = gep %new_base, off2 - off0
BB2:
%load1 = load i32, i32* %new_gep0
%load2 = load i32, i32* %new_gep1
%load3 = load i32, i32* %new_gep2
In the above example, the struct is split into two parts. The first part still
starts from %base and the second part starts from %new_base. After the
splitting, %new_gep1 and %new_gep2 have smaller offsets and then can be sunk to
BB2 and folded into their users.
The algorithm to split data structure is simple and very similar to the work of
merging SExts. First, it collects GEPs that have large offsets when iterating
the blocks. Second, it splits the underlying data structures and updates the
collected GEPs to use smaller offsets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42759
llvm-svn: 332015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With custom lowering for vector MULLH{S,U}, it is now profitable to
vectorize a divide by constant loop for the custom types (v16i8, v8i16,
and v4i32). The cost if based on TargetLowering::Build{S,U}DIV which
uses a multiply by constant plus adjustment to express a divide by
constant.
Both {u,s}mull{2} are expressed as Instruction::Mul and shifts by
Instruction::AShr.
llvm-svn: 331873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
extending loads and use them in a pre-legalize combiner for AArch64
Reverting this to see if the clang-cmake-aarch64-global-isel and
clang-cmake-aarch64-quick bots are failing because of this commit.
We know it wasn't r331819.
llvm-svn: 331846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
pre-legalize combiner for AArch64
Summary: Depends on D45541
Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, javed.absar, aemerson
Reviewed By: aemerson
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45543
llvm-svn: 331816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46251
llvm-svn: 331758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D41445 changed the behaviour of 'isReg()'
to also return 'true' if the parsed register operand is a vector
register. Code in the AsmMatcher checks if a register is a subclass of the
expected register class. However, even though both parsed registers map
to the same physical register, the 'v' register is of kind 'NeonVector',
where 'q' is of type Scalar, where isSubclass() does not distinguish
between the two cases.
The solution is to use an AsmOperand instead of the register directly,
and use the PredicateMethod to distinguish the two operands.
This fixes for example:
ldr v0, [x0] // 'v0' is an invalid operand for this instruction
ldr q0, [x0] // valid
Reviewers: aemerson, Gerolf, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46310
llvm-svn: 331755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
extending loads
Summary:
Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)).
This had a few drawbacks:
* G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if
registers didn't naturally hold those sizes.
* All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the
extend went missing (e.g. by optimization).
* At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we
improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement
would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were
permitted.
* The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern
rewriting to translate patterns into this style.
This patch changes the representation to:
* (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x)
* (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits()
which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their
native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from
SelectionDAG patterns.
Each extending load can be lowered by the legalizer into separate extends
and loads, however a target that supports s1 will need the any-extending
load to extend to at least s8 since LLVM does not represent memory accesses
smaller than 8 bit. The legalizer can widenScalar G_LOAD into an
any-extending load but sign/zero-extending loads need help from something
else like a combiner pass. A follow-up patch that adds combiner helpers for
for this will follow.
The new representation requires that the MMO correctly reflect the memory
access so this has been corrected in a couple tests. I've also moved the
extending loads to their own tests since they are (mostly) separate opcodes
now. Additionally, the re-write appears to have invalidated two tests from
select-with-no-legality-check.mir since the matcher table no longer contains
loads that result in s1's and they aren't legal in AArch64 anymore.
Depends on D45540
Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, javed.absar
Reviewed By: rtereshin
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45541
llvm-svn: 331601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dyn_cast.
Inspired by r331508, I did a grep and found these.
Mostly just change from dyn_cast to cast. Some cases also showed a dyn_cast result being converted to bool, so those I changed to isa.
llvm-svn: 331577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Adding support for Fast flags in the SDNode to leverage fast math sub flag usage.
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm, jbhateja, hfinkel, escha, qcolombet, echristo, wristow, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rampitec, nhaehnle, tstellar, FarhanaAleen, nemanjai, javed.absar, jbhateja, hfinkel, wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45710
llvm-svn: 331547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds a custom lowering for ISD::MULH{S,U} used on divide by
constant optimization (DAGCombiner::BuildSDIV and DAGCombiner::BuildUDIV).
New patterns for smull and umull are added, so AArch64ISD::{S,U}MULL
can be correctly lowered to smull2 and umull2.
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46009
llvm-svn: 331522
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46355
llvm-svn: 331384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46270
llvm-svn: 331352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46248
llvm-svn: 331349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
load/store instructions.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46269
llvm-svn: 331343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46250
llvm-svn: 331339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46121
llvm-svn: 331260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are two separate fixes here:
* The lowering code for non-extending loads should report UnableToLegalize instead of emitting the same instruction.
* The target should not be requesting lowering of non-extending loads.
llvm-svn: 331201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch extends the 'isSVEVectorRegWithShiftExtend' function to
improve diagnostics for SVE's gather load (scalar + vector) addressing
modes. Instead of always suggesting the 'unscaled' addressing mode,
the use of DiagnosticPredicate enables a more specific error message
in the context where the scaling is incorrect. For example:
ld1h z0.d, p0/z, [x0, z0.d, lsl #2]
^
shift amount should be '1'
Instead of suggesting the packed, unscaled addressing mode:
expected 'z[0..31].d, (uxtw|sxtw)'
the assembler now suggests using the proper scaling:
expected 'z[0..31].d, (lsl|uxtw|sxtw) #1'
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46124
llvm-svn: 331162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of the add<operandname>Operands() functions are the same
and can be replaced by using a single 'RenderMethod' in
the AArch64InstrFormats.td file. Since many of the scaled
immediates (with different scaling/bits) are the same, most of
these can reuse the same AsmOperandClass.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46122
llvm-svn: 331146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46120
llvm-svn: 331145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lowerings for them
Summary:
Previously, a extending load was represented at (G_*EXT (G_LOAD x)).
This had a few drawbacks:
* G_LOAD had to be legal for all sizes you could extend from, even if
registers didn't naturally hold those sizes.
* All sizes you could extend from had to be allocatable just in case the
extend went missing (e.g. by optimization).
* At minimum, G_*EXT and G_TRUNC had to be legal for these sizes. As we
improve optimization of extends and truncates, this legality requirement
would spread without considerable care w.r.t when certain combines were
permitted.
* The SelectionDAG importer required some ugly and fragile pattern
rewriting to translate patterns into this style.
This patch begins changing the representation to:
* (G_[SZ]EXTLOAD x)
* (G_LOAD x) any-extends when MMO.getSize() * 8 < ResultTy.getSizeInBits()
which resolves these issues by allowing targets to work entirely in their
native register sizes, and by having a more direct translation from
SelectionDAG patterns.
This patch introduces the new generic instructions and new variation on
G_LOAD and adds lowering for them to convert back to the existing
representations.
Depends on D45466
Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, volkan, rovka, aemerson, javed.absar
Reviewed By: aemerson
Subscribers: aemerson, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45540
llvm-svn: 331115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit makes it so that if you outline a def of some register, then the
call instruction created by the outliner actually reflects that the register
is defined by the call. It also makes it so that outlined functions don't
have the TracksLiveness property.
Outlined calls shouldn't break liveness assumptions that someone might make.
This also un-XFAILs the noredzone test, and updates the calls test.
llvm-svn: 331095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MachineMemOperand
Summary:
Currently only the memory size is supported but others can be added as
needed.
narrowScalar for G_LOAD and G_STORE now correctly update the
MachineMemOperand and will refuse to legalize atomics since those need more
careful expansions to maintain atomicity.
Reviewers: ab, aditya_nandakumar, bogner, rtereshin, aemerson, javed.absar
Reviewed By: aemerson
Subscribers: aemerson, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45466
llvm-svn: 331071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Use RegUnits to track register aliases in PostRASink and AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.
Reviewers: thegameg, mcrosier, gberry, qcolombet, sebpop, MatzeB, t.p.northover, javed.absar
Reviewed By: thegameg, sebpop
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45695
llvm-svn: 331066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Put the first ldp at the end, so that the load-store optimizer can run
and merge the ldp and the add into a post-index ldp.
This didn't work in case no frame was needed and resulted in code size
regressions.
llvm-svn: 331044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds IR intrinsics for the AArch64 dot-product instructions introduced in
v8.2-A.
Differential revisioon: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46107
llvm-svn: 331036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The program might have unusual expectations for functions; for example,
the Linux kernel's build system warns if it finds references from .text
to .init.data.
I'm not sure this is something we actually want to make any guarantees
about (there isn't any explicit rule that would disallow outlining
in this case), but we might want to be conservative anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46091
llvm-svn: 331007
|