| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's possible for the lock file to disappear and the owning process to
return before we're able to see the generated file. Spin for a little
while to see if it shows up before failing.
llvm-svn: 178909
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This implementation of NoneType/None does have some holes but I haven't
found one that doesn't - open to improvement.
llvm-svn: 175696
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
gone, check for the actual file we care about.
llvm-svn: 172033
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 163131
|
|
|
library, since it doesn't really have anything to do with Clang.
llvm-svn: 149203
|
