| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements a limited form of autolinking primarily designed to allow
either the --dependent-library compiler option, or "comment lib" pragmas (
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/comment-c-cpp?view=vs-2017) in
C/C++ e.g. #pragma comment(lib, "foo"), to cause an ELF linker to automatically
add the specified library to the link when processing the input file generated
by the compiler.
Currently this extension is unique to LLVM and LLD. However, care has been taken
to design this feature so that it could be supported by other ELF linkers.
The design goals were to provide:
- A simple linking model for developers to reason about.
- The ability to to override autolinking from the linker command line.
- Source code compatibility, where possible, with "comment lib" pragmas in other
environments (MSVC in particular).
Dependent library support is implemented differently for ELF platforms than on
the other platforms. Primarily this difference is that on ELF we pass the
dependent library specifiers directly to the linker without manipulating them.
This is in contrast to other platforms where they are mapped to a specific
linker option by the compiler. This difference is a result of the greater
variety of ELF linkers and the fact that ELF linkers tend to handle libraries in
a more complicated fashion than on other platforms. This forces us to defer
handling the specifiers to the linker.
In order to achieve a level of source code compatibility with other platforms
we have restricted this feature to work with libraries that meet the following
"reasonable" requirements:
1. There are no competing defined symbols in a given set of libraries, or
if they exist, the program owner doesn't care which is linked to their
program.
2. There may be circular dependencies between libraries.
The binary representation is a mergeable string section (SHF_MERGE,
SHF_STRINGS), called .deplibs, with custom type SHT_LLVM_DEPENDENT_LIBRARIES
(0x6fff4c04). The compiler forms this section by concatenating the arguments of
the "comment lib" pragmas and --dependent-library options in the order they are
encountered. Partial (-r, -Ur) links are handled by concatenating .deplibs
sections with the normal mergeable string section rules. As an example, #pragma
comment(lib, "foo") would result in:
.section ".deplibs","MS",@llvm_dependent_libraries,1
.asciz "foo"
For LTO, equivalent information to the contents of a the .deplibs section can be
retrieved by the LLD for bitcode input files.
LLD processes the dependent library specifiers in the following way:
1. Dependent libraries which are found from the specifiers in .deplibs sections
of relocatable object files are added when the linker decides to include that
file (which could itself be in a library) in the link. Dependent libraries
behave as if they were appended to the command line after all other options. As
a consequence the set of dependent libraries are searched last to resolve
symbols.
2. It is an error if a file cannot be found for a given specifier.
3. Any command line options in effect at the end of the command line parsing apply
to the dependent libraries, e.g. --whole-archive.
4. The linker tries to add a library or relocatable object file from each of the
strings in a .deplibs section by; first, handling the string as if it was
specified on the command line; second, by looking for the string in each of the
library search paths in turn; third, by looking for a lib<string>.a or
lib<string>.so (depending on the current mode of the linker) in each of the
library search paths.
5. A new command line option --no-dependent-libraries tells LLD to ignore the
dependent libraries.
Rationale for the above points:
1. Adding the dependent libraries last makes the process simple to understand
from a developers perspective. All linkers are able to implement this scheme.
2. Error-ing for libraries that are not found seems like better behavior than
failing the link during symbol resolution.
3. It seems useful for the user to be able to apply command line options which
will affect all of the dependent libraries. There is a potential problem of
surprise for developers, who might not realize that these options would apply
to these "invisible" input files; however, despite the potential for surprise,
this is easy for developers to reason about and gives developers the control
that they may require.
4. This algorithm takes into account all of the different ways that ELF linkers
find input files. The different search methods are tried by the linker in most
obvious to least obvious order.
5. I considered adding finer grained control over which dependent libraries were
ignored (e.g. MSVC has /nodefaultlib:<library>); however, I concluded that this
is not necessary: if finer control is required developers can fall back to using
the command line directly.
RFC thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/131004.html.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60274
llvm-svn: 360984
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
34169)
When building with LTO, builtin functions that are defined but whose calls have not been inserted yet, get internalized. The Global Dead Code Elimination phase in the new LTO implementation then removes these function definitions. Later optimizations add calls to those functions, and the linker then dies complaining that there are no definitions. This CL fixes the new LTO implementation to check if a function is builtin, and if so, to not internalize (and later DCE) the function. As part of this fix I needed to move the RuntimeLibcalls.{def,h} files from the CodeGen subidrectory to the IR subdirectory. I have updated all the files that accessed those two files to access their new location.
Fixes PR34169
Patch by Caroline Tice!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49434
llvm-svn: 337847
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See r331124 for how I made a list of files missing the include.
I then ran this Python script:
for f in open('filelist.txt'):
f = f.strip()
fl = open(f).readlines()
found = False
for i in xrange(len(fl)):
p = '#include "llvm/'
if not fl[i].startswith(p):
continue
if fl[i][len(p):] > 'Config':
fl.insert(i, '#include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h"\n')
found = True
break
if not found:
print 'not found', f
else:
open(f, 'w').write(''.join(fl))
and then looked through everything with `svn diff | diffstat -l | xargs -n 1000 gvim -p`
and tried to fix include ordering and whatnot.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331184
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
legitimately be used by Object/IRSymtab
llvm-svn: 328135
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change the representation of COFF comdats so that a COFF linker
is able to accurately resolve comdats between IR and native object
files. Specifically, apply name mangling to comdat names consistently
with native object files, and do not export comdats with an internal
leader because they do not affect symbol resolution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40278
llvm-svn: 318805
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm::Error when creating an irsymtab.
This fixes bitcode emission for modules containing invalid weak externals.
llvm-svn: 312686
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
ELF linkers generate __start_<secname> and __stop_<secname> symbols
when there is a value in a section <secname> where the name is a valid
C identifier. If dead stripping determines that the values declared
in section <secname> are dead, and we then internalize (and delete)
such a symbol, programs that reference the corresponding start and end
section symbols will get undefined reference linking errors.
To fix this, add the section name to the IRSymtab entry when a symbol is
defined in a specific section. Then use this in the gold-plugin to mark
the symbol as external and visible from outside the summary when the
section name is a valid C identifier.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35639
llvm-svn: 309009
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes PR27551.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33974
llvm-svn: 306488
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These will be necessary in order to handle upgrades from old bitcode
files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33972
llvm-svn: 306486
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will be needed in order to share the irsymtab string table with
the bitcode string table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33971
llvm-svn: 305937
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
named metadata.
The new metadata is easier to manipulate than module flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31349
llvm-svn: 305227
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This check is a requirement of the irsymtab builder, not of any
particular caller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33970
llvm-svn: 305023
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This data type includes the contents of a bitcode file.
Right now a bitcode file can only contain modules, but
a later change will add a symbol table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33969
llvm-svn: 305019
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
bitcode file.
This code now lives in lib/Object. The idea is that it can now be reused by
IRObjectFile among other things.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31921
llvm-svn: 304958
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Marking them as used causes them to be considered visible outside of LTO. This
prevents the symbols from being internalized or discarded, either by GlobalDCE
or by summary-based dead stripping in ThinLTO.
This change makes it unnecessary to add these symbols to llvm.compiler.used
in the backend, as the symbols are kept alive by virtue of being external,
so remove the backend code that handles that.
Fixes PR32798.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32544
llvm-svn: 301438
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 301275
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of storing an UncommonIndex on the Symbol, use a flag bit to store
whether the Symbol has an Uncommon. This shrinks Chromium's .bc files (after
D32061) by about 1%.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32070
llvm-svn: 300514
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is consistent with the bitcode string table.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31922
llvm-svn: 300465
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Start using it in LLD to avoid needing to read bitcode again just to get the
target triple, and in llvm-lto2 to avoid printing symbol table information
that is inappropriate for the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32038
llvm-svn: 300300
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The linker needs to be able to determine whether a symbol is text or data to
handle the case of a common being overridden by a strong definition in an
archive. If the archive contains a text member of the same name as the common,
that function is discarded. However, if the archive contains a data member of
the same name, that strong definition overrides the common. This is a behavior
of ld.bfd, which the Qualcomm linker also supports in LTO.
Here's a test case to illustrate:
####
cat > 1.c << \!
int blah;
!
cat > 2.c << \!
int blah() {
return 0;
}
!
cat > 3.c << \!
int blah = 20;
!
clang -c 1.c
clang -c 2.c
clang -c 3.c
ar cr lib.a 2.o 3.o
ld 1.o lib.a -t
####
The correct output is:
1.o
(lib.a)3.o
Thanks to Shankar Easwaran and Hemant Kulkarni for the test case!
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, rafael, pcc, davide
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31901
llvm-svn: 300205
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299184
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/i686-mingw32-RA-on-linux/builds/25073/steps/build_llvmclang/logs/stdio
llvm-svn: 299171
|
|
|
InputFiles. NFCI.
Introduce symbol table data structures that can be potentially written to
disk, have the LTO library build those data structures using temporarily
constructed modules and redirect the LTO library implementation to go through
those data structures. This allows us to remove the LLVMContext and Modules
owned by InputFile.
With this change I measured a peak memory consumption decrease from 5.4GB to
2.8GB in a no-op incremental ThinLTO link of Chromium on Linux. The impact on
memory consumption is larger in COFF linkers where we are currently forced
to materialize all metadata in order to read linker options. Peak memory
consumption linking a large piece of Chromium for Windows with full LTO and
debug info decreases from >64GB (OOM) to 15GB.
Part of PR27551.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31364
llvm-svn: 299168
|
