| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When computing the call-site offset, use AP.CurrentFnSymForSize instead of
AP.CurrentFnSym. There should be no change for other targets, but this is
necessary for generating valid expressions for PPC64/ELF.
llvm-svn: 225807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While, generally speaking, the process of lowering arguments for a patchpoint
is the same as lowering a regular indirect call, on some targets it may not be
exactly the same. Targets may not, for example, want to add additional register
dependencies that apply only to making cross-DSO calls through linker stubs,
may not want to load additional registers out of function descriptors, and may
not want to add additional side-effect-causing instructions that cannot be
removed later with the call itself being generated.
The PowerPC target will use this in a future commit (for all of the reasons
stated above).
llvm-svn: 225806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some targets, PowerPC for example, have pseudo-registers (such as that used to
represent the rounding mode), that don't have DWARF register numbers or a
register class. These are used only for internal dependency tracking, and
should not appear in the recorded live-outs. This adds a callback allowing the
target to pre-process the live-out mask in order to remove these kinds of
registers so that the StackMaps code does not complain about them and/or
attempt to include them in the output.
This will be used by the PowerPC target in a future commit.
llvm-svn: 225805
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
guarded with that hook.
llvm-svn: 225795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Peephole optimizer is scanning a basic block forward. At some point it
needs to answer the question "given a pointer to an MI in the current
BB, is it located before or after the current instruction".
To perform this, it keeps a set of the MIs already seen during the scan,
if a MI is not in the set, it is assumed to be after.
It means that newly created MIs have to be inserted in the set as well.
This commit passes the set as an argument to the target-dependent
optimizeSelect() so that it can properly update the set with the
(potentially) newly created MIs.
llvm-svn: 225772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This name is less descriptive, but it sort of puts things in the
'llvm.frame...' namespace, relating it to frameallocate and
frameaddress. It also avoids using "allocate" and "allocation" together.
llvm-svn: 225752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These intrinsics allow multiple functions to share a single stack
allocation from one function's call frame. The function with the
allocation may only perform one allocation, and it must be in the entry
block.
Functions accessing the allocation call llvm.recoverframeallocation with
the function whose frame they are accessing and a frame pointer from an
active call frame of that function.
These intrinsics are very difficult to inline correctly, so the
intention is that they be introduced rarely, or at least very late
during EH preparation.
Reviewers: echristo, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6493
llvm-svn: 225746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also require unsafe FP math for no since there isn't a way to
test for signed zeros.
llvm-svn: 225744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move the declaration of DebugLocDwarfExpression into DwarfExpression.h
because it needs to be accessed from AsmPrinterDwarf.cpp and DwarfDebug.cpp
NFC.
llvm-svn: 225734
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NFC.
llvm-svn: 225731
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Otherwise we'll attempt to forward ECX, EDX, and EAX for cdecl and
stdcall thunks, leaving us with no scratch registers for indirect call
targets.
Fixes PR22052.
llvm-svn: 225729
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
readability.
llvm-svn: 225726
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks Chandler for noticing!
llvm-svn: 225724
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225720
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NFC.
llvm-svn: 225717
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 225707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
into a new class DwarfExpression that can be shared between AsmPrinter
and DwarfUnit.
This is the first step towards unifying the two entirely redundant
implementations of dwarf expression emission in DwarfUnit and AsmPrinter.
Almost no functional change — Testcases were updated because asm comments
that used to be on two lines now appear on the same line, which is
actually preferable.
llvm-svn: 225706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a fixed version of reverted r225500. It fixes the too early
if() continue; of the last patch and adds a comment to the unorthodox
loop.
llvm-svn: 225652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This lets us remove CGP duplicate.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6541
llvm-svn: 225640
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
introduced.
A test case for the bug was already committed in r225385.
Patch by Rafael Espindola.
llvm-svn: 225534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code that eliminated additional coalescable copies in
removeCopyByCommutingDef() used MergeValueNumberInto() which internally
may merge A into B or B into A. In this case A and B had different Def
points, so we have to reset ValNo.Def to the intended one after merging.
llvm-svn: 225503
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225502
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225501
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As pointed out by Aditya (and Owen), when we elide an FP extend to form an FMA,
we need to extend the incoming operands so that the resulting node will really
be legal. This is currently enabled only for PowerPC, and it happens to work
there regardless, but this should fix the functionality for everyone else
should anyone else wish to use it.
llvm-svn: 225492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As pointed out by Aditya (and Owen), there are two things wrong with this code.
First, it adds patterns which elide FP extends when forming FMAs, and that might
not be profitable on all targets (it belongs behind the pre-existing
aggressive-FMA-formation flag). This is fixed by this change.
Second, the resulting nodes might have operands of different types (the
extensions need to be re-added). That will be fixed in the follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 225485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a command-line option to enable hoisting even cheap instructions (in
low-register-pressure situations). This is turned off by default, but has
proved useful for testing purposes.
llvm-svn: 225470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Drive-by cleanup; I noticed this when reviewing the patch that became
r225466.
llvm-svn: 225468
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Ramkumar Ramachandra!
llvm-svn: 225466
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225441
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PEI tries to keep track of how much starting or ending a call sequence adjusts the stack pointer by, so that it can resolve frame-index references. Currently, it takes a very simplistic view of how SP adjustments are done - both FrameStartOpcode and FrameDestroyOpcode adjust it exactly by the amount written in its first argument.
This view is in fact incorrect for some targets (e.g. due to stack re-alignment, or because it may want to adjust the stack pointer in multiple steps). However, that doesn't cause breakage, because most targets (the only in-tree exception appears to be 32-bit ARM) rely on being able to simplify the call frame pseudo-instructions earlier, so this code is never hit.
Moving the computation into TargetInstrInfo allows targets to override the way the adjustment is computed if they need to have a non-zero SPAdj.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6863
llvm-svn: 225437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A broken hint is a copy where both ends are assigned different colors. When a
variable gets evicted in the neighborhood of such copies, it is likely we can
reconcile some of them.
** Context **
Copies are inserted during the register allocation via splitting. These split
points are required to relax the constraints on the allocation problem. When
such a point is inserted, both ends of the copy would not share the same color
with respect to the current allocation problem. When variables get evicted,
the allocation problem becomes different and some split point may not be
required anymore. However, the related variables may already have been colored.
This usually shows up in the assembly with pattern like this:
def A
...
save A to B
def A
use A
restore A from B
...
use B
Whereas we could simply have done:
def B
...
def A
use A
...
use B
** Proposed Solution **
A variable having a broken hint is marked for late recoloring if and only if
selecting a register for it evict another variable. Indeed, if no eviction
happens this is pointless to look for recoloring opportunities as it means the
situation was the same as the initial allocation problem where we had to break
the hint.
Finally, when everything has been allocated, we look for recoloring
opportunities for all the identified candidates.
The recoloring is performed very late to rely on accurate copy cost (all
involved variables are allocated).
The recoloring is simple unlike the last change recoloring. It propagates the
color of the broken hint to all its copy-related variables. If the color is
available for them, the recoloring uses it, otherwise it gives up on that hint
even if a more complex coloring would have worked.
The recoloring happens only if it is profitable. The profitability is evaluated
using the expected frequency of the copies of the currently recolored variable
with a) its current color and b) with the target color. If a) is greater or
equal than b), then it is profitable and the recoloring happen.
** Example **
Consider the following example:
BB1:
a =
b =
BB2:
...
= b
= a
Let us assume b gets split:
BB1:
a =
b =
BB2:
c = b
...
d = c
= d
= a
Because of how the allocation work, b, c, and d may be assigned different
colors. Now, if a gets evicted to make room for c, assuming b and d were
assigned to something different than a.
We end up with:
BB1:
a =
st a, SpillSlot
b =
BB2:
c = b
...
d = c
= d
e = ld SpillSlot
= e
This is likely that we can assign the same register for b, c, and d,
getting rid of 2 copies.
** Performances **
Both ARM64 and x86_64 show performance improvements of up to 3% for the
llvm-testsuite + externals with Os and O3. There are a few regressions too that
comes from the (in)accuracy of the block frequency estimate.
<rdar://problem/18312047>
llvm-svn: 225422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
type (in addition to the memory type).
The *LoadExt* legalization handling used to only have one type, the
memory type. This forced users to assume that as long as the extload
for the memory type was declared legal, and the result type was legal,
the whole extload was legal.
However, this isn't always the case. For instance, on X86, with AVX,
this is legal:
v4i32 load, zext from v4i8
but this isn't:
v4i64 load, zext from v4i8
Whereas v4i64 is (arguably) legal, even without AVX2.
Note that the same thing was done a while ago for truncstores (r46140),
but I assume no one needed it yet for extloads, so here we go.
Calls to getLoadExtAction were changed to add the value type, found
manually in the surrounding code.
Calls to setLoadExtAction were mechanically changed, by wrapping the
call in a loop, to match previous behavior. The loop iterates over
the MVT subrange corresponding to the memory type (FP vectors, etc...).
I also pulled neighboring setTruncStoreActions into some of the loops;
those shouldn't make a difference, as the additional types are illegal.
(e.g., i128->i1 truncstores on PPC.)
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6532
llvm-svn: 225421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
subranges.
The register coalescer used to remove implicit_defs when they are
covered by the main range anyway. With subreg liveness tracking we can't
do that anymore in places where the IMPLICIT_DEF is required as begin of
a subregister liverange.
llvm-svn: 225416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I got confused and assumed SrcIdx/DstIdx of the CoalescerPair is a
subregister index in SrcReg/DstReg, but they are actually subregister
indices of the coalesced register that get you back to SrcReg/DstReg
when applied.
Fixed the bug, improved comments and simplified code accordingly.
Testcase by Tom Stellard!
llvm-svn: 225415
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225413
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A few loops do trickier things than just iterating on an MVT subset,
so I'll leave them be for now.
Follow-up of r225387.
llvm-svn: 225392
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225380
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225378
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225368
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 225366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change includes the most basic possible GCStrategy for a GC which is using the statepoint lowering code. At the moment, this GCStrategy doesn't really do much - aside from actually generate correct stackmaps that is - but I went ahead and added a few extra correctness checks as proof of concept. It's mostly here to provide documentation on how to do one, and to provide a point for various optimization legality hooks I'd like to add going forward. (For context, see the TODOs in InstCombine around gc.relocate.)
Most of the validation logic added here as proof of concept will soon move in to the Verifier. That move is dependent on http://reviews.llvm.org/D6811
There was discussion in the review thread about addrspace(1) being reserved for something. I'm going to follow up on a seperate llvmdev thread. If needed, I'll update all the code at once.
Note that I am deliberately not making a GCStrategy required to use gc.statepoints with this change. I want to give folks out of tree - including myself - a chance to migrate. In a week or two, I'll make having a GCStrategy be required for gc.statepoints. To this end, I added the gc tag to one of the test cases but not others.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6808
llvm-svn: 225365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Used to iterate over previously added memory dependencies in
adjustChainDeps() and iterateChainSucc().
SDep::isCtrl() was previously used in these places, that also gave
anti and output edges. The code may be worse if these are followed,
because MisNeedChainEdge() will conservatively return true since a
non-memory instruction has no memory operands, and a false chain dep
will be added. It is also unnecessary since all memory accesses of
interest will be reached by memory dependencies, and there is a budget
limit for the number of edges traversed.
This problem was found on an out-of-tree target with enabled alias
analysis. No test case for an in-tree target has been found.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 225351
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For -enable-aa-sched-mi and -use-tbaa-in-sched-mi.
llvm-svn: 225350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is affecting the behavior of some ObjC++ / AArch64 test cases on Darwin.
Reverting to get the bots green while I track down the source of the changed
behavior.
llvm-svn: 225311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No semantic change intended.
Reviewers: resistor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6834
llvm-svn: 225278
|