| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
data is available.
In the current BB placement algorithm, a loop chain always contains all loop blocks. This has a drawback that cold blocks in the loop may be inserted on a hot function path, hence increasing branch cost and also reducing icache locality.
Consider a simple example shown below:
A
|
B⇆C
|
D
When B->C is quite cold, the best BB-layout should be A,B,D,C. But the current implementation produces A,C,B,D.
This patch filters those cold blocks off from the loop chain by comparing the ratio:
LoopBBFreq / LoopFreq
to 20%: if it is less than 20%, we don't include this BB to the loop chain. Here LoopFreq is the frequency of the loop when we reduce the loop into a single node. In general we have more cold blocks when the loop has few iterations. And vice versa.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11662
llvm-svn: 251833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1) PR25154. This is basically a repeat of PR18102, which was fixed in
r200201, and broken again by r234430. The latter changed which of the
store nodes was merged into from the first to the last. Thus, we now
also need to prefer merging a later store at a given address into the
target node, instead of an earlier one.
2) While investigating that, I also realized I'd introduced a bug in
r236850. There, I removed a check for alignment -- not realizing that
nothing except the alignment check was ensuring that none of the stores
were overlapping! This is a really bogus way to ensure there's no
aliased stores.
A better solution to both of these issues is likely to always use the
code added in the 'if (UseAA)' branches which rearrange the chain based
on a more principled analysis. I'll look into whether that can be used
always, but in the interest of getting things back to working, I think a
minimal change makes sense.
llvm-svn: 251816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since the verifier will give false reports if it incorrectly thinks MI is
loading or storing using an FI, it is necessary to scan memoperands and
find out how the FI is used in the instruction. This should be relatively
rare.
Needed to make CodeGen/SystemZ/spill-01.ll pass, which now runs with this flag.
Reviewed by Quentin Colombet.
llvm-svn: 251620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It broke 3 arm testcases.
This reverts commit r251608.
llvm-svn: 251615
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Maybe I just missed the humor there ;-)
llvm-svn: 251609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was a layering violation in ScheduleDAGInstrs (and
MachineSchedulerBase) they both shouldn't know directly whether they are
used by the PostMachineScheduler or the MachineScheduler.
llvm-svn: 251608
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These MachO file directives are used by linkers and other tools to provide
compatibility information, much like the existing .ios_version_min and
.macosx_version_min.
llvm-svn: 251569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Teach `computeKnownBitsFromRangeMetadata` to use `!range` metadata more
aggressively.
Reviewers: majnemer, nlewycky, jingyue
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14100
llvm-svn: 251487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Don't call `computeKnownBitsFromRangeMetadata` for extended loads --
this can cause a mismatch between the width of the !range metadata and
the width of the APInt's accumulating `KnownZero` (and `KnownOne` in the
future). This isn't a problem now, but will be after a future change.
Note: this can be made more aggressive in the future.
Reviewers: nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14107
llvm-svn: 251486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
r248010 changed the -debug output to use short ids, but did not
similarly modify the graph printer. Change to be consistent, for ease of
cross-reference.
llvm-svn: 251465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a usage of the IR-level fast-math-flags now that they are propagated to SDNodes.
This was originally part of D8900.
Removing the global 'enable-unsafe-fp-math' checks will require auto-upgrade and
possibly other changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9708
llvm-svn: 251450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
successors when optimization is disabled.
When optimization is disabled, edge weights that are stored in MBB won't be used so that we don't have to store them. Currently, this is done by adding successors with default weight 0, and if all successors have default weights, the weight list will be empty. But that the weight list is empty doesn't mean disabled optimization (as is stated several times in MachineBasicBlock.cpp): it may also mean all successors just have default weights.
We should discourage using default weights when adding successors, because it is very easy for users to forget update the correct edge weights instead of using default ones (one exception is that the MBB only has one successor). In order to detect such usages, it is better to differentiate using default weights from the case when optimizations is disabled.
In this patch, a new interface addSuccessorWithoutWeight(MBB*) is created for when optimization is disabled. In this case, MBB will try to maintain an empty weight list, but it cannot guarantee this as for many uses of addSuccessor() whether optimization is disabled or not is not checked. But it can guarantee that if optimization is enabled, then the weight list always has the same size of the successor list.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13963
llvm-svn: 251429
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 251398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When taking the remainder of a value divided by a constant, visitREM()
attempts to convert the REM to a longer but faster sequence of instructions.
This conversion calls combine() on a speculative DIV instruction. Commit
rL250825 may cause this combine() to return a DIVREM, corrupting nearby nodes.
Flow eventually hits unreachable().
This patch adds a test case and a check to prevent visitREM() from trying
to convert the REM instruction in cases where a DIVREM is possible.
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D14035
llvm-svn: 251373
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
In particular, this CL speeds up the official Chrome linking with LTO by
1.8x.
See more details in https://crbug.com/542426
Reviewers: dblaikie
Subscribers: jevinskie
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13918
llvm-svn: 251353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
contained within.
Also adjust the code to avoid 3 redundant map lookups.
llvm-svn: 251327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Android libc provides a fixed TLS slot for the unsafe stack pointer,
and this change implements direct access to that slot on AArch64 via
__builtin_thread_pointer() + offset.
This change also moves more code into TargetLowering and its
target-specific subclasses to get rid of target-specific codegen
in SafeStackPass.
This change does not touch the ARM backend because ARM lowers
builting_thread_pointer as aeabi_read_tp, which is not available
on Android.
The previous iteration of this change was reverted in r250461. This
version leaves the generic, compiler-rt based implementation in
SafeStack.cpp instead of moving it to TargetLoweringBase in order to
allow testing without a TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 251324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the target does not support these intrinsics they should be converted to a chain of scalar load or store operations.
If the mask is not constant, the scalarizer will build a chain of conditional basic blocks.
I added isLegalMaskedGather() isLegalMaskedScatter() APIs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13722
llvm-svn: 251237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When using the MCU psABI, compiler-generated library calls should pass
some parameters in-register. However, since inreg marking for x86 is currently
done by the front end, it will not be applied to backend-generated calls.
This is a workaround for PR3997, which describes a similar issue for -mregparm.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13977
llvm-svn: 251223
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Richard.
llvm-svn: 251213
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move ConstantFP canonicalization of commutative instructions to start of 2-op node creation (matches integer) - simplifies constant folding code.
llvm-svn: 251203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't need a mask of a rotation result to be a constant splat - any constant scalar/vector can be usefully folded.
Followup to D13851.
llvm-svn: 251197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds support for lowering to the XOP VPROT / VPROTI vector bit rotation instructions.
This has required changes to the DAGCombiner rotation pattern matching to support vector types - so far I've only changed it to support splat vectors, but generalising this further is feasible in the future.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13851
llvm-svn: 251188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This ensures that BranchFolding (and similar) won't remove these blocks.
Also allow AsmPrinter::EmitBasicBlockStart to process MBBs which are
address-taken but do not have BBs that are address-taken, since otherwise
its call to getAddrLabelSymbolTableToEmit would fail an assertion on such
blocks. I audited the other callers of getAddrLabelSymbolTableToEmit
(and getAddrLabelSymbol); they all have BBs known to be address-taken
except for the call through getAddrLabelSymbol from
WinException::create32bitRef; that call is actually now unreachable, so
I've removed it and updated the signature of create32bitRef.
This fixes PR25168.
Reviewers: majnemer, andrew.w.kaylor, rnk
Subscribers: pgavlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13774
llvm-svn: 251113
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Moreover, this seems unused.
llvm-svn: 251081
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251037
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes the need to pass a hardcoded size in many places. NFC
llvm-svn: 251032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we fold "mul ((add x, c1), c1)" -> "add ((mul x, c2), c1*c2)", we bail if (add x, c1) has multiple
users which would result in an extra add instruction.
In such cases, this patch adds a check to see if we can eliminate a multiply instruction in exchange for the extra add.
I also added the capability of doing the existing optimization with non-splatted vectors (splatted also works).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13740
llvm-svn: 251028
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's a relic from the earlier implementation, let's remove it.
llvm-svn: 250964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will be used in future commits for AMDGPU to promote
operations on i64 vectors into operations on 32-bit vector
components.
This will be used / tested in future AMDGPU commits.
llvm-svn: 250945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we have to convert the masked.load, masked.store to scalar code, we generate a chain of conditional basic blocks.
I added optimization for constant mask vector.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13855
llvm-svn: 250893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A mem-to-mem instruction (that both loads and stores), which store to an
FI, cannot pass the verifier since it thinks it is loading from the FI.
For the mem-to-mem instruction, do a looser check in visitMachineOperand()
and only check liveness at the reg-slot while analyzing a frame index operand.
Needed to make CodeGen/SystemZ/xor-01.ll pass with -verify-machineinstrs,
which now runs with this flag.
Reviewed by Evan Cheng and Quentin Colombet.
llvm-svn: 250885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Do not tail duplicate blocks where the successor has a phi node,
and the corresponding value in that phi node uses a subregister.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13922
llvm-svn: 250877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
default: llvm_unreachable("This action is not supported yet!");
-- so I'm adding one to the third switch block, too.
This is a follow-up fix for http://reviews.llvm.org/D13862
llvm-svn: 250830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
TargetLoweringBase::Expand is defined as "Try to expand this to other ops,
otherwise use a libcall." For ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV, the choice between
the two possibilities was defined in a rather convoluted way:
- if DIVREM is legal, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM has a custom lowering, expand to DIVREM
- if DIVREM libcall is defined and a remainder from the same division is
computed elsewhere, expand to a DIVREM libcall
- else, expand to a DIV libcall
This had the undesirable effect that if both DIV and DIVREM are implemented
as libcalls, then ISD::UDIV and ISD::SDIV are expanded to the heavier DIVREM
libcall, even when the remainder isn't used.
The new code adds a new LegalizeAction, TargetLoweringBase::LibCall, so that
backends can directly control whether they prefer an expansion or a conversion
to a libcall. This makes the generic lowering code even more generic,
allowing its reuse in a wider range of target-specific configurations.
The useful effect is that ARM backend will now generate a call
to __aeabi_{i,u}div rather than __aeabi_{i,u}divmod in cases where
it doesn't need the remainder. There's no functional change outside
the ARM backend.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin
Subscribers: t.p.northover, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13862
llvm-svn: 250826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DAGCombiner.
Summary:
In addition to moving the code over, this patch amends the DIV,REM -> DIVREM
combining to run on all affected nodes at once: if the nodes are converted
to DIVREM one at a time, then the resulting DIVREM may get legalized by the
backend into something target-specific that we won't be able to recognize
and correlate with the remaining nodes.
The motivation is to "prepare terrain" for D13862: when we set DIV and REM
to be legalized to libcalls, instead of the DIVREM, we otherwise lose the
ability to combine them together. To prevent this, we need to take the
DIV,REM -> DIVREM combining out of the lowering stage.
Reviewers: RKSimon, eli.friedman, rengolin
Subscribers: john.brawn, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13733
llvm-svn: 250825
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 250776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
MachineBlockPlacement pass.
Currently, in MachineBlockPlacement pass the loop is rotated to let the best exit to be the last BB in the loop chain, to maximize the fall-through from the loop to outside. With profile data, we can determine the cost in terms of missed fall through opportunities when rotating a loop chain and select the best rotation. Basically, there are three kinds of cost to consider for each rotation:
1. The possibly missed fall through edge (if it exists) from BB out of the loop to the loop header.
2. The possibly missed fall through edges (if they exist) from the loop exits to BB out of the loop.
3. The missed fall through edge (if it exists) from the last BB to the first BB in the loop chain.
Therefore, the cost for a given rotation is the sum of costs listed above. We select the best rotation with the smallest cost. This is only for PGO mode when we have more precise edge frequencies.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10717
llvm-svn: 250754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was originally checked in at r250527, but reverted at r250570 because of PR25222.
There were at least 2 problems:
1. The cost check was checking for an instruction with an exact cost of TCC_Expensive;
that should have been >=.
2. The cause of the clang stage 1 failures was illegally sinking 'call' instructions;
we can't sink instructions that may have side effects / are not safe to execute speculatively.
Fixed those conditions in sinkSelectOperand() and added test cases.
Original commit message:
This is a follow-up to the discussion in D12882.
Ideally, we would like SimplifyCFG to be able to form select instructions even when the operands
are expensive (as defined by the TTI cost model) because that may expose further optimizations.
However, we would then like a later pass like CodeGenPrepare to undo that transformation if the
target would likely benefit from not speculatively executing an expensive op (this patch).
Once we have this safety mechanism in place, we can adjust SimplifyCFG to restore its
select-formation behavior that changed with r248439.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13297
llvm-svn: 250743
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It looks like an extra negation snuck in as apart of restoring it.
llvm-svn: 250726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While technically this is untested dead code, it has out-of-tree users.
This reverts a part of r250434.
llvm-svn: 250717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r250596.
Reverted for now as the commit triggers assert in the AMDGPU target
pending investigation.
llvm-svn: 250713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Originally I planned to use the same interface for masked gather/scatter and set isConsecutive to "false" in this case.
Now I'm implementing masked gather/scatter and see that the interface is inconvenient. I want to add interfaces isLegalMaskedGather() / isLegalMaskedScatter() instead of using the "Consecutive" parameter in the existing interfaces.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13850
llvm-svn: 250686
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 250653
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 250651
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Minor fix to D13665 found during post-commit review.
llvm-svn: 250616
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also do some cleanups comment improvements.
llvm-svn: 250598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This property was already used in the code path when no liveness
intervals are present. Unfortunately the code path that uses liveness
intervals tried to query a cached live interval for an allocatable
physreg, those are usually not computed so a conservative default was
used.
This doesn't affect any of the lit testcases. This is a foreclosure to
upcoming changes which should be NFC but without this patch this tidbit
wouldn't be NFC.
llvm-svn: 250596
|