| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316875
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Introduce a isConstOrDemandedConstSplat helper function that can recognise a constant splat build vector for at least the demanded elts we care about.
llvm-svn: 316866
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316847
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
computeKnownBits/ComputeNumSignBits
For cases where we know the floating point representations match the bitcasted integer equivalent, allow bitcasting to these types.
This is especially useful for the X86 floating point compare results which return all/zero bits but as a floating point type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39289
llvm-svn: 316831
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and extload has multi users
In function DAGCombiner::visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG, sext can be combined with extload even if sextload is not supported by target, then
if sext is the only user of extload, there is no big difference, no harm no benefit.
if extload has more than one user, the combined sextload may block extload from combining with other zext, causes extra zext instructions generated. As demonstrated by the attached test case.
This patch add the constraint that when sextload is not supported by target, sext can only be combined with extload if it is the only user of extload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39108
llvm-svn: 316802
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316753
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not having the subclass data on an MemIntrinsicSDNodes means it was possible
to try to fold 2 nodes with the same operands but differing MMO flags. This
would trip an assertion when trying to refine the alignment between the 2
MachineMemOperands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38898
llvm-svn: 316737
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This code added in r297930 assumed that it could create
a select with a condition type that is just an integer
bitcast of the selected type. For AMDGPU any vselect is
going to be scalarized (although the vector types are legal),
and all select conditions must be i1 (the same as getSetCCResultType).
This logic doesn't really make sense to me, but there's
never really been a consistent policy in what the select
condition mask type is supposed to be. Try to extend
the logic for skipping the transform for condition types
that aren't setccs. It doesn't seem quite right to me though,
but checking conditions that seem more sensible (like whether the
vselect is going to be expanded) doesn't work since this
seems to depend on that also.
llvm-svn: 316554
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similar to how llvm::salvagDebugInfo hooks into InstCombine, this adds
a hook that can be invoked before an SDNode that is associated with an
SDDbgValue is erased to capture the effect of the deleted node in a
DIExpression.
The motivating example is an SDDebugValue attached to an ADD operation
that gets folded into a LOAD+OFFSET operation.
rdar://problem/32121503
llvm-svn: 316525
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316496
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316485
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316466
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316457
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
SP is only used in an assert. Caused by r316374.
llvm-svn: 316377
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a bug where we'd crash given code like the test-case from
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30792 . Instead, we let the
offending clobber silently slide through.
This doesn't fully fix said bug, since the assembler will still complain
the moment it sees a crypto/fp/vector op, and we still don't diagnose
calls that require vector regs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39030
llvm-svn: 316374
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
combineShuffleOfScalars is very conservative about shuffled BUILD_VECTORs that can be combined together.
This patch adds one additional case - if both BUILD_VECTORs represent splats of the same scalar value but with different UNDEF elements, then we should create a single splat BUILD_VECTOR, sharing only the UNDEF elements defined by the shuffle mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38696
llvm-svn: 316331
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316258
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316257
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
computeKnownBits and ComputeNumSignBits.
We don't need to do any additional recursion, we just need to analyze the APInt stored in the node. This matches what the ValueTracking versions do for IR.
llvm-svn: 316256
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TargetLowering::SimplifyDemandedBits.
Summary:
We shouldn't recurse any further but it doesn't mean we shouldn't be able to give the known bits for a constant. The caller would probably like that we always return the right answer for a constant RHS. This matches what InstCombine does in this case.
I don't have a test case because this showed up while trying to revive D31724.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38967
llvm-svn: 316255
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
negative index we allow is -1.
llvm-svn: 316183
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 316079
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows us to simplify later visitVECTOR_SHUFFLE optimizations such as combineShuffleOfScalars.
Noticed whilst working on D38696
llvm-svn: 316017
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
UpdateNodeOperands() modifies the node in-place and using the return value isn’t strictly necessary. However, it does not necessarily modify the node, but may return a resultant node if it already exists in the DAG. See comments in UpdateNodeOperands(). In that case, the return value must be used to avoid such scenarios as an infinite loop (node is assumed to have been updated, so added back to the worklist, and re-processed; however, node hasn’t changed so it is once again passed to UpdateNodeOperands(), assumed modified, added back to worklist; cycle infinitely repeats).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38466
llvm-svn: 315957
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 315927
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Minor addition and follow up of r314773 and r311533: this adds more
debug messages to the type legalizer. For each node, it dumps
legalization info for results and operands nodes, rather than just the
final legalized node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38726
llvm-svn: 315904
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
causing link errors for several people.
Error LNK2019 unresolved external symbol "public: void __cdecl `anonymous namespace'::MatchableInfo::dump(void)const " (?dump@MatchableInfo@?A0xf4f1c304@@QEBAXXZ) referenced in function "public: void __cdecl `anonymous namespace'::AsmMatcherEmitter::run(class llvm::raw_ostream &)" (?run@AsmMatcherEmitter@?A0xf4f1c304@@QEAAXAEAVraw_ostream@llvm@@@Z) llvm-tblgen D:\llvm\2017\utils\TableGen\AsmMatcherEmitter.obj 1
llvm-svn: 315854
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is only currently used for mad/fma transforms.
This is the only case where it should be used for AMDGPU,
so add an opcode to be sure.
llvm-svn: 315740
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 315690
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Use less temporary APInts. Use bit counting more. Don't call getScalarSizeInBits so many places, just capture it once.
llvm-svn: 315671
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 315670
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
work properly for vector types.
I don't know if we ever hit this case or not. Turning it into an assert only fired on expanding some atomic operation in a SystemZ lit test.
llvm-svn: 315648
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
overloads of SimplifyDemandedBits. NFC
llvm-svn: 315641
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
less temporary APInts by counting bits instead. NFCI
llvm-svn: 315628
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D37348
llvm-svn: 315610
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Add LLVM_FORCE_ENABLE_DUMP cmake option, and use it along with
LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS to set LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP.
Remove NDEBUG and only use LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP to enable dump methods.
Move definition of LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP from config.h to llvm-config.h so
it'll be picked up by public headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38406
llvm-svn: 315590
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 315540
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eg:
insert v4i32 V, (v2i16 X), 2 --> shuffle v8i16 V', X', {0,1,2,3,8,9,6,7}
This is a generalization of the IR fold in D38316 to handle insertion into a non-undef vector.
We may want to abandon that one if we can't find value in squashing the more specific pattern sooner.
We're using the existing legal shuffle target hook to avoid AVX512 horror with vXi1 shuffles.
There may be room for improvement in the shuffle lowering here, but that would be follow-up work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38388
llvm-svn: 315460
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The NumFixedArgs field of CallLoweringInfo is used by
TargetLowering::LowerCallTo to determine whether a given argument is passed
using the vararg calling convention or not (specifically, to set IsFixed for
each ISD::OutputArg).
Firstly, CallLoweringInfo::setLibCallee and CallLoweringInfo::setCallee both
incorrectly set NumFixedArgs based on the _previous_ args list. Secondly,
TargetLowering::LowerCallTo failed to increment NumFixedArgs when modifying
the argument list so a pointer is passed for the return value.
If your backend uses the IsFixed property or directly accesses NumFixedArgs,
it is _possible_ this change could result in codegen changes (although the
previous behaviour would have been incorrect). No such cases have been
identified during code review for any in-tree architecture.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37898
llvm-svn: 315457
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
other minor fixes (NFC).
llvm-svn: 315380
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
See https://llvm.org/PR33743 for more details
It seems that for non-power of 2 vector sizes, the algorithm can produce
non-matching sizes for input and result causing an assert.
This usually isn't a problem as the isAnyExtend check will weed these out, but
in some cases (most often with lots of undefined values for the mask indices) it
can pass this check for non power of 2 vectors.
Adding in an extra check that ensures that bit size will match for the result
and input (as required)
Subscribers: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35241
llvm-svn: 315307
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sync it up with the name of the class actually defined here. This has been
bothering me for a while...
llvm-svn: 315249
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was a suggested follow-up to:
D37017 / https://reviews.llvm.org/rL313577
llvm-svn: 315206
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 315185
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 315154
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
FastISel::hasTrivialKill() was the only user of the "IntPtrTy" version of
Cast::isNoopCast(). According to review comments in D37894 we could instead
use the "DataLayout" version of the method, and thus get rid of the
"IntPtrTy" versions of isNoopCast() completely.
With the above done, the remaining isNoopCast() could then be simplified
a bit more.
Reviewers: arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38497
llvm-svn: 314969
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(re-applying post required revision changes.)"
It broke the Chromium / SQLite build; see PR34830.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314919
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
post required revision changes.)
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314886
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
values (reapplied)
Summary:
Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the
debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger.
This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment
expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer
value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent
the memory address order.
I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF
pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed.
Original patch was reverted due to using -stop-after=isel in
the test case (but that is only working when AMDGPU target
is included in the llc build). The test case has now been
updated to use -stop-before=expand-isel-pseudos instead.
Patch by: dstenb
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Subscribers: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172
llvm-svn: 314781
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds some more debug messages to the type legalizer and functions
like PromoteNode, ExpandNode, ExpandLibCall in an attempt to make
the debug messages a little bit more informative and useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38450
llvm-svn: 314773
|