| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a range has a lower bound of 0, add an AssertZext from the
nearest floor power of two.
This allows operations with some workitem intrinsics with known
maximum ranges to use fast 24-bit multiplies.
llvm-svn: 260109
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This commit renames GCRelocateOperands to GCRelocateInst and makes it an
intrinsic wrapper, similar to e.g. MemCpyInst. Also, all users of
GCRelocateOperands were changed to use the new intrinsic wrapper instead.
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: reames, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15762
llvm-svn: 256811
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It turns out that terminatepad gives little benefit over a cleanuppad
which calls the termination function. This is not sufficient to
implement fully generic filters but MSVC doesn't support them which
makes terminatepad a little over-designed.
Depends on D15478.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15479
llvm-svn: 255522
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers. They cannot
be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
control flow edges. Because of this, we are forced to carefully
analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
nesting among funclets. While we have logic to clone funclets when
they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
representation which forbade them upfront.
Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
flow, just a bunch of simple operands; catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad. Their presence can be inferred
implicitly using coloring information.
N.B. The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for. An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139
llvm-svn: 255422
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes.
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights.
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This the second patch above. In this patch SelectionDAG starts to use
probability-based interfaces in MBB to add successors but other MC passes are
still using weight-based interfaces. Therefore, we need to maintain correct
weight list in MBB even when probability-based interfaces are used. This is
done by updating weight list in probability-based interfaces by treating the
numerator of probabilities as weights. This change affects many test cases
that check successor weight values. I will update those test cases once this
patch looks good to you.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361
llvm-svn: 253965
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Carefully selected parts without deleting graph stuff and dumping methods.
llvm-svn: 250434
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with the new pass manager, and no longer relying on analysis groups.
This builds essentially a ground-up new AA infrastructure stack for
LLVM. The core ideas are the same that are used throughout the new pass
manager: type erased polymorphism and direct composition. The design is
as follows:
- FunctionAAResults is a type-erasing alias analysis results aggregation
interface to walk a single query across a range of results from
different alias analyses. Currently this is function-specific as we
always assume that aliasing queries are *within* a function.
- AAResultBase is a CRTP utility providing stub implementations of
various parts of the alias analysis result concept, notably in several
cases in terms of other more general parts of the interface. This can
be used to implement only a narrow part of the interface rather than
the entire interface. This isn't really ideal, this logic should be
hoisted into FunctionAAResults as currently it will cause
a significant amount of redundant work, but it faithfully models the
behavior of the prior infrastructure.
- All the alias analysis passes are ported to be wrapper passes for the
legacy PM and new-style analysis passes for the new PM with a shared
result object. In some cases (most notably CFL), this is an extremely
naive approach that we should revisit when we can specialize for the
new pass manager.
- BasicAA has been restructured to reflect that it is much more
fundamentally a function analysis because it uses dominator trees and
loop info that need to be constructed for each function.
All of the references to getting alias analysis results have been
updated to use the new aggregation interface. All the preservation and
other pass management code has been updated accordingly.
The way the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass works is to detect the
available alias analyses when run, and add them to the results object.
This means that we should be able to continue to respect when various
passes are added to the pipeline, for example adding CFL or adding TBAA
passes should just cause their results to be available and to get folded
into this. The exception to this rule is BasicAA which really needs to
be a function pass due to using dominator trees and loop info. As
a consequence, the FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass directly depends on
BasicAA and always includes it in the aggregation.
This has significant implications for preserving analyses. Generally,
most passes shouldn't bother preserving FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass
because rebuilding the results just updates the set of known AA passes.
The exception to this rule are LoopPass instances which need to preserve
all the function analyses that the loop pass manager will end up
needing. This means preserving both BasicAAWrapperPass and the
aggregating FunctionAAResultsWrapperPass.
Now, when preserving an alias analysis, you do so by directly preserving
that analysis. This is only necessary for non-immutable-pass-provided
alias analyses though, and there are only three of interest: BasicAA,
GlobalsAA (formerly GlobalsModRef), and SCEVAA. Usually BasicAA is
preserved when needed because it (like DominatorTree and LoopInfo) is
marked as a CFG-only pass. I've expanded GlobalsAA into the preserved
set everywhere we previously were preserving all of AliasAnalysis, and
I've added SCEVAA in the intersection of that with where we preserve
SCEV itself.
One significant challenge to all of this is that the CGSCC passes were
actually using the alias analysis implementations by taking advantage of
a pretty amazing set of loop holes in the old pass manager's analysis
management code which allowed analysis groups to slide through in many
cases. Moving away from analysis groups makes this problem much more
obvious. To fix it, I've leveraged the flexibility the design of the new
PM components provides to just directly construct the relevant alias
analyses for the relevant functions in the IPO passes that need them.
This is a bit hacky, but should go away with the new pass manager, and
is already in many ways cleaner than the prior state.
Another significant challenge is that various facilities of the old
alias analysis infrastructure just don't fit any more. The most
significant of these is the alias analysis 'counter' pass. That pass
relied on the ability to snoop on AA queries at different points in the
analysis group chain. Instead, I'm planning to build printing
functionality directly into the aggregation layer. I've not included
that in this patch merely to keep it smaller.
Note that all of this needs a nearly complete rewrite of the AA
documentation. I'm planning to do that, but I'd like to make sure the
new design settles, and to flesh out a bit more of what it looks like in
the new pass manager first.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12080
llvm-svn: 247167
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Typically these are catchpads, which hold data used to decide whether to
catch the exception or continue unwinding. We also shouldn't create MBBs
for catchendpads, cleanupendpads, or terminatepads, since no real code
can live in them.
This fixes a problem where MI passes (like the register allocator) would
try to put code into catchpad blocks, which are not executed by the
runtime. In the new world, blocks ending in invokes now have many
possible successors.
llvm-svn: 247102
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Add a `cleanupendpad` instruction, used to mark exceptional exits out of
cleanups (for languages/targets that can abort a cleanup with another
exception). The `cleanupendpad` instruction is similar to the `catchendpad`
instruction in that it is an EH pad which is the target of unwind edges in
the handler and which itself has an unwind edge to the next EH action.
The `cleanupendpad` instruction, similar to `cleanupret` has a `cleanuppad`
argument indicating which cleanup it exits. The unwind successors of a
`cleanuppad`'s `cleanupendpad`s must agree with each other and with its
`cleanupret`s.
Update WinEHPrepare (and docs/tests) to accomodate `cleanupendpad`.
Reviewers: rnk, andrew.w.kaylor, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12433
llvm-svn: 246751
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
generated in lowering switch.
Currently, when edge weights are assigned to edges that are created when lowering switch statement, the weight on the edge to default statement (let's call it "default weight" here) is not considered. We need to distribute this weight properly. However, without value profiling, we have no idea how to distribute it. In this patch, I applied the heuristic that this weight is evenly distributed to successors.
For example, given a switch statement with cases 1,2,3,5,10,11,20, and every edge from switch to each successor has weight 10. If there is a binary search tree built to test if n < 10, then its two out-edges will have weight 4x10+10/2 = 45 and 3x10 + 10/2 = 35 respectively (currently they are 40 and 30 without considering the default weight). Each distribution (which is 5 here) will be stored in each SwitchWorkListItem for further distribution.
There are some exceptions:
For a jump table header which doesn't have any edge to default statement, we don't distribute the default weight to it.
For a bit test header which covers a contiguous range and hence has no edges to default statement, we don't distribute the default weight to it.
When the branch checks a single value or a contiguous range with no edge to default statement, we don't distribute the default weight to it.
In other cases, the default weight is evenly distributed to successors.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12418
llvm-svn: 246522
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
statement.
Currently, when lowering switch statement and a new basic block is built for jump table / bit test header, the edge to this new block is not assigned with a correct weight. This patch collects the edge weight from all its successors and assign this sum of weights to the edge (and also the other fall-through edge). Test cases are adjusted accordingly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12166#fae6eca7
llvm-svn: 246104
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was causing problems when some functions use a GuardReg and some
don't as can happen when mixing SelectionDAG and FastISel generated
functions.
llvm-svn: 246075
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
bit test cover a contiguous range.
When lowering switch statement, if bit tests are used then LLVM will always generates a jump to the default statement in the last bit test. However, this is not necessary when all cases in bit tests cover a contiguous range. This is because when generating the bit tests header MBB, there is a range check that guarantees cases in bit tests won't go outside of [low, high], where low and high are minimum and maximum case values in the bit tests. This patch checks if this is the case and then doesn't emit jump to default statement and hence saves a bit test and a branch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12249
llvm-svn: 245976
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible
exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the
back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11097
llvm-svn: 243766
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The unsigned opcode argument here was the result of BinaryOperator->getOpcode().
That returns a BinaryOps enum which is more accurate than passing around an
unsigned.
llvm-svn: 242265
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commits r241888-r241891, I didn't mean to commit them.
llvm-svn: 241893
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This introduces new instructions neccessary to implement MSVC-compatible
exception handling support. Most of the middle-end and none of the
back-end haven't been audited or updated to take them into account.
Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, reames, nlewycky, rjmccall
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11041
llvm-svn: 241888
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 241829
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Avoid using the TargetMachine owned DataLayout and use the Module owned
one instead. This requires passing the DataLayout up the stack to
ComputeValueVTs().
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11019
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241773
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
binary search tree
Sparse switches with profile info are lowered as weight-balanced BSTs. For
example, if the node weights are {1,1,1,1,1,1000}, the right-most node would
end up in a tree by itself, bringing it closer to the top.
However, a leaf in this BST can contain up to 3 cases, and having a single
case in a leaf node as in the example means the tree might become
unnecessarily high.
This patch adds a heauristic to the pivot selection algorithm that moves more
cases into leaf nodes unless that would lower their rank. It still doesn't
yield the optimal tree in every case, but I believe it's conservatibely correct.
llvm-svn: 240224
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
SelectionDAGBuilder::removeValue is dead now, after rL236563.
llvm-svn: 236618
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
We default the value argument to nullptr. The only use of the value is
in diagnosePossiblyInvalidConstraint and that seems to be resilient to
it being nullptr.
Reviewers: atrick, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9479
llvm-svn: 236555
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The exported class will be used in later change, in
StatepointLowering.cpp. It is still internal to SelectionDAG (not
exported via include/).
Reviewers: reames, atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9478
llvm-svn: 236554
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Currently this does not change anything, but change will be used in a
later change to StatepointLowering.cpp
Reviewers: reames, atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9477
llvm-svn: 236553
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Finish off PR23080 by renaming the debug info IR constructs from `MD*`
to `DI*`. The last of the `DIDescriptor` classes were deleted in
r235356, and the last of the related typedefs removed in r235413, so
this has all baked for about a week.
Note: If you have out-of-tree code (like a frontend), I recommend that
you get everything compiling and tests passing with the *previous*
commit before updating to this one. It'll be easier to keep track of
what code is using the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy and what you've already
updated, and I think you're extremely unlikely to insert bugs. YMMV of
course.
Back to *this* commit: I did this using the rename-md-di-nodes.sh
upgrade script I've attached to PR23080 (both code and testcases) and
filtered through clang-format-diff.py. I edited the tests for
test/Assembler/invalid-generic-debug-node-*.ll by hand since the columns
were off-by-three. It should work on your out-of-tree testcases (and
code, if you've followed the advice in the previous paragraph).
Some of the tests are in badly named files now (e.g.,
test/Assembler/invalid-mdcompositetype-missing-tag.ll should be
'dicompositetype'); I'll come back and move the files in a follow-up
commit.
llvm-svn: 236120
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All other patches, including tests will follow.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7665
llvm-svn: 235970
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I previously thought switch clusters would need to use uint64_t in case
the weights of multiple cases overflowed a 32-bit int. It turns
out that the weights on a terminator instruction are capped to allow for
being added together, so using a uint32_t should be safe.
llvm-svn: 235945
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
building binary tree (PR22262)
Third time's the charm. The previous commit was reverted as a
reverse for-loop in SelectionDAGBuilder::lowerWorkItem did 'I--'
on an iterator at the beginning of a vector, causing asserts
when using debugging iterators. This commit fixes that.
llvm-svn: 235608
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
builds using MSVC's STL. The iterator is being used outside of its valid range.
llvm-svn: 235597
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tree (PR22262)
This is a re-commit of r235101, which also fixes the problems with the previous patch:
- Switches with only a default case and non-fallthrough were handled incorrectly
- The previous patch tickled a bug in PowerPC Early-Return Creation which is fixed here.
> This is a major rewrite of the SelectionDAG switch lowering. The previous code
> would lower switches as a binary tre, discovering clusters of cases
> suitable for lowering by jump tables or bit tests as it went along. To increase
> the likelihood of finding jump tables, the binary tree pivot was selected to
> maximize case density on both sides of the pivot.
>
> By not selecting the pivot in the middle, the binary trees would not always
> be balanced, leading to performance problems in the generated code.
>
> This patch rewrites the lowering to search for clusters of cases
> suitable for jump tables or bit tests first, and then builds the binary
> tree around those clusters. This way, the binary tree will always be balanced.
>
> This has the added benefit of decoupling the different aspects of the lowering:
> tree building and jump table or bit tests finding are now easier to tweak
> separately.
>
> For example, this will enable us to balance the tree based on profile info
> in the future.
>
> The algorithm for finding jump tables is quadratic, whereas the previous algorithm
> was O(n log n) for common cases, and quadratic only in the worst-case. This
> doesn't seem to be major problem in practice, e.g. compiling a file consisting
> of a 10k-case switch was only 30% slower, and such large switches should be rare
> in practice. Compiling e.g. gcc.c showed no compile-time difference. If this
> does turn out to be a problem, we could limit the search space of the algorithm.
>
> This commit also disables all optimizations during switch lowering in -O0.
>
> Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8649
llvm-svn: 235560
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Looks like it broke the sanitizer-ppc64-linux1 build. Reverting for now.
llvm-svn: 235108
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tree (PR22262)
This is a major rewrite of the SelectionDAG switch lowering. The previous code
would lower switches as a binary tre, discovering clusters of cases
suitable for lowering by jump tables or bit tests as it went along. To increase
the likelihood of finding jump tables, the binary tree pivot was selected to
maximize case density on both sides of the pivot.
By not selecting the pivot in the middle, the binary trees would not always
be balanced, leading to performance problems in the generated code.
This patch rewrites the lowering to search for clusters of cases
suitable for jump tables or bit tests first, and then builds the binary
tree around those clusters. This way, the binary tree will always be balanced.
This has the added benefit of decoupling the different aspects of the lowering:
tree building and jump table or bit tests finding are now easier to tweak
separately.
For example, this will enable us to balance the tree based on profile info
in the future.
The algorithm for finding jump tables is O(n^2), whereas the previous algorithm
was O(n log n) for common cases, and quadratic only in the worst-case. This
doesn't seem to be major problem in practice, e.g. compiling a file consisting
of a 10k-case switch was only 30% slower, and such large switches should be rare
in practice. Compiling e.g. gcc.c showed no compile-time difference. If this
does turn out to be a problem, we could limit the search space of the algorithm.
This commit also disables all optimizations during switch lowering in -O0.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8649
llvm-svn: 235101
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 234764
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
These add no value but can make a class non-trivially copyable. NFC.
llvm-svn: 234688
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As a follow-up to r234021, assert that a debug info intrinsic variable's
`MDLocalVariable::getInlinedAt()` always matches the
`MDLocation::getInlinedAt()` of its `!dbg` attachment.
The goal here is to get rid of `MDLocalVariable::getInlinedAt()`
entirely (PR22778), but I'll let these assertions bake for a while
first.
If you have an out-of-tree backend that just broke, you're probably
attaching the wrong `DebugLoc` to a `DBG_VALUE` instruction. The one
you want is the location that was attached to the corresponding
`@llvm.dbg.declare` or `@llvm.dbg.value` call that you started with.
llvm-svn: 234038
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use `MDLocalVariable` and `MDExpression` directly for the arguments of
`EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue()` to simplify a follow-up patch.
llvm-svn: 234026
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It was previously repeatedly erasing elements from the middle of a vector,
causing O(n^2) worst-case run-time.
llvm-svn: 232789
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 232759
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 232729
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
them. Note that we still can not lower gc.relocates for invoke statepoints.
Also it extracts getCopyFromRegs helper function in SelectionDAGBuilder as we need to be able to customize type of the register exported from basic block during lowering of the gc.result.
(Resubmitting this change after not being able to reproduce buildbot failure)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7760
llvm-svn: 231800
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Analysis/properties.m test.
llvm-svn: 231374
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
them. Note that we still can not lower gc.relocates for invoke statepoints.
Also it extracts getCopyFromRegs helper function in SelectionDAGBuilder as we need to be able to customize type of the register exported from basic block during lowering of the gc.result.
llvm-svn: 231366
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 230798
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lowering into a separate function 'LowerStatepoint' which uses ImmutableStatepoint instead of a CallInst. Also related utility functions are changed to receive ImmutableCallSite.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7756
llvm-svn: 230017
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is in preparation for a fix to llvm.org/PR22262. One of the ideas
here is to first find a good jump table range first and then split
before and after it. Thereby, we don't need to use the
split-based-on-density heuristic at all, which can make the "binary
tree" deteriorate in various cases.
Also some minor cleanups.
No functional changes.
llvm-svn: 226551
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
utils/sort_includes.py.
I clearly haven't done this in a while, so more changed than usual. This
even uncovered a missing include from the InstrProf library that I've
added. No functionality changed here, just mechanical cleanup of the
include order.
llvm-svn: 225974
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds handling for ExceptionHandling::MSVC, used by the
x86_64-pc-windows-msvc triple. It assumes that filter functions have
already been outlined in either the frontend or the backend. Filter
functions are used in place of the landingpad catch clause type info
operands. In catch clause order, the first filter to return true will
catch the exception.
The C specific handler table expects the landing pad to be split into
one block per handler, but LLVM IR uses a single landing pad for all
possible unwind actions. This patch papers over the mismatch by
synthesizing single instruction BBs for every catch clause to fill in
the EH selector that the landing pad block expects.
Missing functionality:
- Accessing data in the parent frame from outlined filters
- Cleanups (from __finally) are unsupported, as they will require
outlining and parent frame access
- Filter clauses are unsupported, as there's no clear analogue in SEH
In other words, this is the minimal set of changes needed to write IR to
catch arbitrary exceptions and resume normal execution.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6300
llvm-svn: 225904
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While, generally speaking, the process of lowering arguments for a patchpoint
is the same as lowering a regular indirect call, on some targets it may not be
exactly the same. Targets may not, for example, want to add additional register
dependencies that apply only to making cross-DSO calls through linker stubs,
may not want to load additional registers out of function descriptors, and may
not want to add additional side-effect-causing instructions that cannot be
removed later with the call itself being generated.
The PowerPC target will use this in a future commit (for all of the reasons
stated above).
llvm-svn: 225806
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm recommiting the codegen part of the patch.
The vectorizer part will be send to review again.
Masked Vector Load and Store Intrinsics.
Introduced new target-independent intrinsics in order to support masked vector loads and stores. The loop vectorizer optimizes loops containing conditional memory accesses by generating these intrinsics for existing targets AVX2 and AVX-512. The vectorizer asks the target about availability of masked vector loads and stores.
Added SDNodes for masked operations and lowering patterns for X86 code generator.
Examples:
<16 x i32> @llvm.masked.load.v16i32(i8* %addr, <16 x i32> %passthru, i32 4 /* align */, <16 x i1> %mask)
declare void @llvm.masked.store.v8f64(i8* %addr, <8 x double> %value, i32 4, <8 x i1> %mask)
Scalarizer for other targets (not AVX2/AVX-512) will be done in a separate patch.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6191
llvm-svn: 223348
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SelectionDAGBuilder
This is the third patch in a small series. It contains the CodeGen support for lowering the gc.statepoint intrinsic sequences (223078) to the STATEPOINT pseudo machine instruction (223085). The change also includes the set of helper routines and classes for working with gc.statepoints, gc.relocates, and gc.results since the lowering code uses them.
With this change, gc.statepoints should be functionally complete. The documentation will follow in the fourth change, and there will likely be some cleanup changes, but interested parties can start experimenting now.
I'm not particularly happy with the amount of code or complexity involved with the lowering step, but at least it's fairly well isolated. The statepoint lowering code is split into it's own files and anyone not working on the statepoint support itself should be able to ignore it.
During the lowering process, we currently spill aggressively to stack. This is not entirely ideal (and we have plans to do better), but it's functional, relatively straight forward, and matches closely the implementations of the patchpoint intrinsics. Most of the complexity comes from trying to keep relocated copies of values in the same stack slots across statepoints. Doing so avoids the insertion of pointless load and store instructions to reshuffle the stack. The current implementation isn't as effective as I'd like, but it is functional and 'good enough' for many common use cases.
In the long term, I'd like to figure out how to integrate the statepoint lowering with the register allocator. In principal, we shouldn't need to eagerly spill at all. The register allocator should do any spilling required and the statepoint should simply record that fact. Depending on how challenging that turns out to be, we may invest in a smarter global stack slot assignment mechanism as a stop gap measure.
Reviewed by: atrick, ributzka
llvm-svn: 223137
|
