| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 216623
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 216616
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 216611
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
just letting them be implicitly created.
llvm-svn: 216525
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 216351
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
isPow2DivCheap
That name doesn't specify signed or unsigned.
Lazy as I am, I eventually read the function and variable comments. It turns out that this is strictly about signed div. But I discovered that the comments are wrong:
srl/add/sra
is not the general sequence for signed integer division by power-of-2. We need one more 'sra':
sra/srl/add/sra
That's the sequence produced in DAGCombiner. The first 'sra' may be removed when dividing by exactly '2', but that's a special case.
This patch corrects the comments, changes the name of the flag bit, and changes the name of the accessor methods.
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5010
llvm-svn: 216237
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with many arguments.
PR20677
llvm-svn: 216175
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes things like fmul x, 2 -> fadd x, x
llvm-svn: 215820
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When combining a pair of shuffle nodes, check if the combined shuffle mask is
trivially Undef. In case, immediately fold that pair of shuffles to Undef.
The lack of checks for undef masks was the root-cause of a poor-codegen bug
in the dag combiner.
Example:
%1 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %A, <4 x i32> %B, <4 x i32> <i32 4, i32 1, i32 1, i32 6>
%2 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 4, i32 1, i32 6>
%3 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %2, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 5, i32 3, i32 3>
Before this patch, on x86 (with -mcpu=corei7) we failed to fold the entire
sequence to Undef value and therefore we generated:
shufps $-123, %xmm1, $xmm0
pshufd $-46, %xmm0, %xmm0
With this patch, the entire shuffle sequence is folded to Undef and no
shuffles are generated in the output assembly.
Added new test cases to test 'combine-vec-shuffle-5.ll'.
llvm-svn: 215797
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch allows a vector fneg of a bitcasted integer value to be optimized in the same way that we already optimize a scalar fneg. If the integer variable is a constant, we can precompute the result and not require any logic ops.
This patch is very similar to a fabs patch committed at r214892.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4852
llvm-svn: 215646
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
input node after manually adding it to the worklist and using CombineTo.
Once we use CombineTo the input node may have been deleted. Despite this
being *completely confusing* and somewhat broken, the only way to
"correctly" return from a DAG combine after potentially deleting the
input node is to return *that exact node*....
But really, this code should just never have used CombineTo. It won't do
what it wants (returning the node as mentioned above just causes the
combine to infloop). The correct way to combine away a casted load to
a load of the correct type is to RAUW the chain directly and then return
the loaded value to replace the actual value node.
I managed to find this with the vector shuffle fuzzer even though it
clearly has nothing at all to do with vector shuffles and rather those
happen to trigger a load of a constant pool that hits this combine *just
right*. I've included the test as it is small and a nice stress test
that the infrastructure isn't asserting.
llvm-svn: 215622
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch improves the existing algorithm in DAGCombiner that
attempts to fold shuffles according to rule:
shuffle(shuffle(x, y, M1), undef, M2) -> shuffle(y, undef, M3)
Before this change, there were cases where the DAGCombiner conservatively
avoided folding shuffles even if the resulting mask would have been legal.
That is because the algorithm wrongly assumed that commuting
an illegal shuffle mask would always produce an illegal mask.
With this change, we now correctly compute the commuted shuffle mask before
calling method 'isShuffleMaskLegal' on it.
On X86, this improves for example the codegen for the following function:
define <4 x i32> @test(<4 x i32> %A, <4 x i32> %B) {
%1 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %B, <4 x i32> %A, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 2, i32 6, i32 7>
%2 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3, i32 2, i32 3>
ret <4 x i32> %2
}
Before this change the X86 backend (-mcpu=corei7) generated
the following assembly code for function @test:
shufps $-23, %xmm0, %xmm1 # xmm1 = xmm1[1,2],xmm0[2,3]
movhlps %xmm1, %xmm1 # xmm1 = xmm1[1,1]
movaps %xmm1, %xmm0
Now we produce:
movhlps %xmm0, %xmm0 # xmm0 = xmm0[1,1]
Added extra test cases in combine-vec-shuffle-2.ll to verify that we correctly
fold according to the above-mentioned rule.
llvm-svn: 215555
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 215409
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allow vector fabs operations on bitcasted constant integer values to be optimized
in the same way that we already optimize scalar fabs.
So for code like this:
%bitcast = bitcast i64 18446744069414584320 to <2 x float> ; 0xFFFF_FFFF_0000_0000
%fabs = call <2 x float> @llvm.fabs.v2f32(<2 x float> %bitcast)
%ret = bitcast <2 x float> %fabs to i64
Instead of generating something like this:
movabsq (constant pool loadi of mask for sign bits)
vmovq (move from integer register to vector/fp register)
vandps (mask off sign bits)
vmovq (move vector/fp register back to integer return register)
We should generate:
mov (put constant value in return register)
I have also removed a redundant clause in the first 'if' statement:
N0.getOperand(0).getValueType().isInteger()
is the same thing as:
IntVT.isInteger()
Testcases for x86 and ARM added to existing files that deal with vector fabs.
One existing testcase for x86 removed because it is no longer ideal.
For more background, please see:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4770
And:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20354
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4785
llvm-svn: 214892
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This code is completely wrong. It is also dead, as if it were to *ever*
run, it would crash. Fortunately, after my work to the combiner, it is
at least *possible* to reach the code, and llvm-stress has found a test
case. Thanks to Patrick for reporting.
It would be really good if anyone who remembers how this code works and
what it was intended to do could add some more obvious test coverage
instead of my completely contrived and reduced test case. My test case
was so brittle I left a bread crumb comment in it to help the next
person to stumble on it and not know what it was actually testing for.
llvm-svn: 214785
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
information and update all callers. No functional change.
llvm-svn: 214781
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
combines) until they are legal.
Doing it the old way could, when the stars align *just* right, cause
a node to get into the combine set prior to being legalized. Then, when
the same node showed up as an operand to another node later on (but not
so much later on that it had been deleted as dead) we would fail to add
it back to the worklist thinking it had already been combined. This
would in turn cause it to not be legalized. Fortunately, we can also
walk the operands looking for uncombined (and thus potentially
un-legalized) nodes late. It will still ensure that we walk all operands
of all nodes and send all of them through both the legalizer without
changes and the combiner at least once. (Which was the original goal of
this).
I have a test case for this bug, but it is terribly brittle. For
example, it will stop finding the bug the moment I enable the new
shuffle lowering. I don't yet have any test case that reliably exercises
this bug, and it isn't clear that it will be possible to craft one. It
is entirely possible that with the new shuffle lowering the two forms of
doing this are precisely equivalent. That doesn't mean we shouldn't take
the more conservative approach of insisting on things in the combined
set having survived the legalizer.
llvm-svn: 214673
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is intended to be the minimal change needed to fix PR20354 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20354 ). The check for a vector operation was wrong; we need to check that the fabs itself is not a vector operation.
This patch will not generate the optimal code. A constant pool load and 'and' op will be generated instead of just returning a value that we can calculate in advance (as we do for the scalar case). I've put a 'TODO' comment for that here and expect to have that patch ready soon.
There is a very similar optimization that we can do in visitFNEG, so I've put another 'TODO' there and expect to have another patch for that too.
llvm-svn: 214670
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vector load is not a good transform when paired loads are available.
The combiner was creating Q-register loads and stores, which then had to be spilled because there are no callee-save Q registers!
llvm-svn: 214634
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so using a single helper which adds operands back onto the worklist.
Several places didn't rigorously do this but a couple already did.
Factoring them together and doing it rigorously is important to delete
things recursively early on in the combiner and get a chance to see
accurate hasOneUse values. While no existing test cases change, an
upcoming patch to add DAG combining logic for PSHUFB requires this to
work correctly.
llvm-svn: 214623
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constant-folded
during DAGCombine in certain circumstances. Unfortunately, the circumstances required
to trigger the issue seem to require a pretty specific interaction of DAGCombines,
and I haven't been able to find a testcase that reproduces on X86, ARM, or AArch64.
The functionality added here is replicated in essentially every other DAG combine,
so it seems pretty obviously correct.
llvm-svn: 214622
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 214455
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently when DAGCombine converts loads feeding a switch into a switch of
addresses feeding a load the new load inherits the isInvariant flag of the left
side. This is incorrect since invariant loads can be reordered in cases where it
is illegal to reoarder normal loads.
This patch adds an isInvariant parameter to getExtLoad() and updates all call
sites to pass in the data if they have it or false if they don't. It also
changes the DAGCombine to use that data to make the right decision when
creating the new load.
llvm-svn: 214449
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DAGCombine may choose to rewrite graphs where two loads feed a select into
graphs where a select of two addresses feed a load. While it sanity checks the
loads to make sure they are broadly equivalent it currently just uses the
alignment restriction of the left node. In cases where the right node has
stronger alignment requiresment this may lead to bad codegen, such as generating
an aligned load where an unaligned load is required. This patch makes the
combine generate a load with an alignment that is the same as whichever is more
restrictive of the two alignments.
Tests included.
rdar://17762530
llvm-svn: 214322
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
inspection in the proccess, and shuffle the logging in the DAG combiner
around a bit.
With this it is much easier to follow what the legalizer is doing. It
should even accurately present most of the strange legalization
operations where a single node is replaced by multiple nodes, etc. There
is still some information lost (we log SDNodes not SDValues so we don't
log which result is used for which thing), but I think this is much
closer to a usable system. Notably, this will make it *much* more
apparant when legalization is actually happening inside the combiner, or
when there is a cycle caused by interactions of the legalizer and the
combiner.
The "bug" I fixed here I'm not sure is remotely possible to trigger. We
were only adding one of the nodes in a replacement to the updated set
rather than all of the nodes in the replacement. Realistically, the
worst result of this are nodes not getting back onto the worklist in the
DAG combiner. I doubt it is possible to trigger this today, and
I certainly don't have any ideas about how, but this at least brings the
code into alignment with the principled operation of the routine.
llvm-svn: 214105
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
over each node in the worklist prior to combining.
This allows the combiner to produce new nodes which need to go back
through legalization. This is particularly useful when generating
operands to target specific nodes in a post-legalize DAG combine where
the operands are significantly easier to express as pre-legalized
operations. My immediate use case will be PSHUFB formation where we need
to build a constant shuffle mask with a build_vector node.
This also refactors the relevant functionality in the legalizer to
support this, and updates relevant tests. I've spoken to the R600 folks
and these changes look like improvements to them. The avx512 change
needs to be investigated, I suspect there is a disagreement between the
legalizer and the DAG combiner there, but it seems a minor issue so
leaving it to be re-evaluated after this patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4564
llvm-svn: 214020
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213928
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with a result number outside the range of results for the node.
I don't know how we managed to not really check this very basic
invariant for so long, but the code is *very* broken at this point.
I have over 270 test failures with the assert enabled. I'm committing it
disabled so that others can join in the cleanup effort and reproduce the
issues. I've also included one of the obvious fixes that I already
found. More fixes to come.
llvm-svn: 213926
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
which have successfully round-tripped through the combine phase, and use
this to ensure all operands to DAG nodes are visited by the combiner,
even if they are only added during the combine phase.
This is critical to have the combiner reach nodes that are *introduced*
during combining. Previously these would sometimes be visited and
sometimes not be visited based on whether they happened to end up on the
worklist or not. Now we always run them through the combiner.
This fixes quite a few bad codegen test cases lurking in the suite while
also being more principled. Among these, the TLS codegeneration is
particularly exciting for programs that have this in the critical path
like TSan-instrumented binaries (although I think they engineer to use
a different TLS that is faster anyways).
I've tried to check for compile-time regressions here by running llc
over a merged (but not LTO-ed) clang bitcode file and observed at most
a 3% slowdown in llc. Given that this is essentially a worst case (none
of opt or clang are running at this phase) I think this is tolerable.
The actual LTO case should be even less costly, and the cost in normal
compilation should be negligible.
With this combining logic, it is possible to re-legalize as we combine
which is necessary to implement PSHUFB formation on x86 as
a post-legalize DAG combine (my ultimate goal).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4638
llvm-svn: 213898
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to enable the preservation of noalias function parameter information
after inlining, and the representation of block-level __restrict__ pointer
information (etc.), additional kinds of aliasing metadata will be introduced.
This metadata needs to be carried around in AliasAnalysis::Location objects
(and MMOs at the SDAG level), and so we need to generalize the current scheme
(which is hard-coded to just one TBAA MDNode*).
This commit introduces only the necessary refactoring to allow for the
introduction of other aliasing metadata types, but does not actually introduce
any (that will come in a follow-up commit). What it does introduce is a new
AAMDNodes structure to hold all of the aliasing metadata nodes associated with
a particular memory-accessing instruction, and uses that structure instead of
the raw MDNode* in AliasAnalysis::Location, etc.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 213859
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The target-independent DAGcombiner will generate:
asr w1, X, #31 w1 = splat sign bit.
add X, X, w1, lsr #28 X = X + 0 or pow2-1
asr w0, X, asr #4 w0 = X/pow2
However, the add + shifts is expensive, so generate:
add w0, X, 15 w0 = X + pow2-1
cmp X, wzr X - 0
csel X, w0, X, lt X = (X < 0) ? X + pow2-1 : X;
asr w0, X, asr 4 w0 = X/pow2
llvm-svn: 213758
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
insertions.
The old behavior could cause arbitrarily bad memory usage in the DAG
combiner if there was heavy traffic of adding nodes already on the
worklist to it. This commit switches the DAG combine worklist to work
the same way as the instcombine worklist where we null-out removed
entries and only add new entries to the worklist. My measurements of
codegen time shows slight improvement. The memory utilization is
unsurprisingly dominated by other factors (the IR and DAG itself
I suspect).
This change results in subtle, frustrating churn in the particular order
in which DAG combines are applied which causes a number of minor
regressions where we fail to match a pattern previously matched by
accident. AFAICT, all of these should be using AddToWorklist to directly
or should be written in a less brittle way. None of the changes seem
drastically bad, and a few of the changes seem distinctly better.
A major change required to make this work is to significantly harden the
way in which the DAG combiner handle nodes which become dead
(zero-uses). Previously, we relied on the ability to "priority-bump"
them on the combine worklist to achieve recursive deletion of these
nodes and ensure that the frontier of remaining live nodes all were
added to the worklist. Instead, I've introduced a routine to just
implement that precise logic with no indirection. It is a significantly
simpler operation than that of the combiner worklist proper. I suspect
this will also fix some other problems with the combiner.
I think the x86 changes are really minor and uninteresting, but the
avx512 change at least is hiding a "regression" (despite the test case
being just noise, not testing some performance invariant) that might be
looked into. Not sure if any of the others impact specific "important"
code paths, but they didn't look terribly interesting to me, or the
changes were really minor. The consensus in review is to fix any
regressions that show up after the fact here.
Thanks to the other reviewers for checking the output on other
architectures. There is a specific regression on ARM that Tim already
has a fix prepped to commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4616
llvm-svn: 213727
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'Worklist' consistently rather than a deeply confusing mixture of
'WorkList' and 'Worklist'.
Notably, the very 'WorkList' of the DAG combiner was exposed to target
specific DAG combines under an interface 'AddToWorklist' which was
implemented by in turn calling 'AddToWorkList' in the combiner. This has
sent me circling with the wrong case in grep one too many times.
I chose to normalize on 'Worklist' because that one won the grep-vote
for llvm/lib/... by a hundered hits or so, and it is used in places
relatively "canonical" such as InstCombine's Worklist. Let's all jsut
pick this casing, whether "correct", "good", or "bad" and be
consistent...
llvm-svn: 213506
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
stack, filter all handle nodes from the DAG combiner worklist.
This will also handle cases where other handle nodes might be
(erroneously) added to the worklist and then cause bugs and explosions
when deleted. For example, when running the legalizer within the DAG
combiner, there are times when other handle nodes are used and can end
up here.
llvm-svn: 213505
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Canonicalize shuffles according to rules:
* shuffle(A, shuffle(A, B)) -> shuffle(shuffle(A,B), A)
* shuffle(B, shuffle(A, B)) -> shuffle(shuffle(A,B), B)
* shuffle(B, shuffle(A, Undef)) -> shuffle(shuffle(A, Undef), B)
This patch helps identifying more shuffle pairs that could be combined reusing
the already existing rules in the DAGCombiner.
Added new test 'combine-vec-shuffle-5.ll' to verify that the canonicalized
shuffles are now folded into a single shuffle node by the DAGCombiner.
Added more test cases to 'combine-vec-shuffle-4.ll'.
llvm-svn: 213504
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
computation."
There's a bug where this can create cycles in the DAG. It will take a bit
to fix, so I'm backing it out for now.
llvm-svn: 213339
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It turns out that in most cases (the main exception being i1-related
types) once these operations are formed we cannot separate them and
the targets end up having to deal with them whether they want to or
not.
This is not a good situation, and a more reasonable default can be
formed by ackowledging this and having targets leave them as Legal.
Only x86 seems to be affected (other targets don't even try marking
the operation Expand).
Mostly there's no visible change here yet, but it will be useful to
have truly expanded EXTLOADS for MVT::f16 softening support.
llvm-svn: 213162
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds two new rules to the DAGCombiner:
1. shuffle (shuffle A, Undef, M0), B, M1 -> shuffle A, B, M2
2. shuffle (shuffle A, Undef, M0), A, M1 -> shuffle A, Undef, M2
We only do this if the combined shuffle is legal for the target.
Example:
;;
define <4 x float> @test(<4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) {
%1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %a, <4 x float> undef, <4 x i32><i32 6, i32 0, i32 1, i32 7>
%2 = shufflevector <4 x float> %1, <4 x float> %b, <4 x i32><i32 1, i32 2, i32 4, i32 5>
ret <4 x i32> %2
}
;;
(using llc -mcpu=corei7 -march=x86-64)
Before, the x86 backend generated:
pshufd $120, %xmm0, %xmm0
shufps $-108, %xmm0, %xmm1
movaps %xmm1, %xmm0
Now the x86 backend generates:
movsd %xmm1, %xmm0
llvm-svn: 213069
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes a crasher in method 'DAGCombiner::visitOR' due to an invalid
call to method 'isShuffleMaskLegal'. On x86, method 'isShuffleMaskLegal'
always expects a legal vector value type in input.
With this patch, we immediately check if the input OR dag node has a legal
vector type; we only try to fold a OR dag node into a single shufflevector
if we know that the resulting shuffle will have a legal type.
This is to avoid calling method 'isShuffleMaskLegal' on a potentially
illegal vector value type.
Added a new test-case to file 'CodeGen/X86/combine-or.ll' to verify that
DAGCombiner doesn't crash in the attempt to check/combine an OR between shuffles
with illegal types.
llvm-svn: 213020
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch teaches the DAGCombiner how to fold a pair of shuffles
according to rules:
1. shuffle(shuffle A, B, M0), B, M1) -> shuffle(A, B, M2)
2. shuffle(shuffle A, B, M0), A, M1) -> shuffle(A, B, M3)
The new rules would only trigger if the resulting shuffle has legal type and
legal mask.
Added test 'combine-vec-shuffle-3.ll' to verify that DAGCombiner correctly
folds shuffles on x86 when the resulting mask is legal. Also added some negative
cases to verify that we avoid introducing illegal shuffles.
llvm-svn: 213001
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
trying to fold shuffles.
Verify that DAGCombiner does not crash when trying to fold a pair of shuffles
according to rule (added at r212539):
(shuffle (shuffle A, Undef, M0), Undef, M1) -> (shuffle A, Undef, M2)
The DAGCombiner avoids folding shuffles if the resulting shuffle dag node
is not legal for the target. That means, the resulting shuffle must have
legal type and legal mask.
Before, the DAGCombiner only called method
'TargetLowering::isShuffleMaskLegal' to check if it was "safe" to fold according
to the above-mentioned rule. However, this caused a crash in the x86 backend
since method 'isShuffleMaskLegal' always expects to be called on a
legal vector type.
llvm-svn: 212915
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(trunc b) combine.""
Don't try to convert the select condition type.
llvm-svn: 212750
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
into a single shuffle if the resulting mask is legal.
This patch teaches the DAGCombiner how to fold shuffles according to the
following new rules:
1. shuffle(shuffle(x, y), undef) -> x
2. shuffle(shuffle(x, y), undef) -> y
3. shuffle(shuffle(x, y), undef) -> shuffle(x, undef)
4. shuffle(shuffle(x, y), undef) -> shuffle(y, undef)
The backend avoids to combine shuffles according to rules 3. and 4. if
the resulting shuffle does not have a legal mask. This is to avoid introducing
illegal shuffles that are potentially expanded into a sub-optimal sequence of
target specific dag nodes during vector legalization.
Added test case combine-vec-shuffle-2.ll to verify that we correctly triggers
the new rules when combining shuffles.
llvm-svn: 212748
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
combine."
This caused miscompilation on, at least, x86-64. SExt(i1 cond) confused other optimizations.
llvm-svn: 212708
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getBooleanContents()
Summary:
On MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6, floating point comparisons return 0 or -1 but integer
comparisons return 0 or 1.
Updated the various uses of getBooleanContents. Two simplifications had to be
disabled when float and int boolean contents differ:
- ScalarizeVecRes_VSELECT except when the kind of boolean contents is trivially
discoverable (i.e. when the condition of the VSELECT is a SETCC node).
- visitVSELECT (select C, 0, 1) -> (xor C, 1).
Come to think of it, this one could test for the common case of 'C'
being a SETCC too.
Preserved existing behaviour for all other targets and updated the affected
MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6 tests. This also fixes the pi benchmark where the 'low'
variable was counting in the wrong direction because it thought it could simply
add the result of the comparison.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, jholewinski, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4389
llvm-svn: 212697
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
build_vector.
llvm-svn: 212677
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Do this if the truncate is free and the select is legal.
llvm-svn: 212640
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tracks which elements of the build vector are in fact undef.
This should make actually inpsecting them (likely in my next patch)
reasonably pretty. Also makes the output parameter optional as it is
clear now that *most* users are happy with undefs in their splats.
llvm-svn: 212581
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
resulting mask is legal.
This patch teaches how to fold a shuffle according to rule:
shuffle (shuffle (x, undef, M0), undef, M1) -> shuffle(x, undef, M2)
We do this only if the resulting mask M2 is legal; this is to avoid introducing
illegal shuffles that are potentially expanded into a sub-optimal sequence
of target specific dag nodes.
This patch has the advantage of being target independent, since it works on ISD
nodes. Therefore, all targets (not only x86) can take advantage of this rule.
The idea behind this patch is that most shuffle pairs can be safely combined
before we run the legalizer on vector operations. This allows us to
combine/simplify dag nodes earlier in the process and not only immediately
before instruction selection stage.
That said. This patch is not meant to replace any existing target specific
combine rules; backends might still introduce new shuffles during legalization
stage. Also, this rule is very simple and avoids to aggressively optimize
shuffles.
llvm-svn: 212539
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
nodes about whether they are splats. This is factored out and improved
from r212324 which got reverted as it was far too aggressive. The new
API should help more conservatively handle buildvectors that are
a mixture of splatted and undef values.
No functionality change at this point. The hope is to slowly
re-introduce the undef-tolerant optimization of splats, but each time
being forced to make a concious decision about how to handle the undefs
in a way that doesn't lead to contradicting assumptions about the
collapsed value.
Hal has pointed out in discussions that this may not end up being the
desired API and instead it may be more convenient to get a mask of the
undef elements or something similar. I'm starting simple and will expand
the API as I adapt actual callers and see exactly what they need.
llvm-svn: 212514
|
