| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so using a single helper which adds operands back onto the worklist.
Several places didn't rigorously do this but a couple already did.
Factoring them together and doing it rigorously is important to delete
things recursively early on in the combiner and get a chance to see
accurate hasOneUse values. While no existing test cases change, an
upcoming patch to add DAG combining logic for PSHUFB requires this to
work correctly.
llvm-svn: 214623
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
constant-folded
during DAGCombine in certain circumstances. Unfortunately, the circumstances required
to trigger the issue seem to require a pretty specific interaction of DAGCombines,
and I haven't been able to find a testcase that reproduces on X86, ARM, or AArch64.
The functionality added here is replicated in essentially every other DAG combine,
so it seems pretty obviously correct.
llvm-svn: 214622
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 214455
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently when DAGCombine converts loads feeding a switch into a switch of
addresses feeding a load the new load inherits the isInvariant flag of the left
side. This is incorrect since invariant loads can be reordered in cases where it
is illegal to reoarder normal loads.
This patch adds an isInvariant parameter to getExtLoad() and updates all call
sites to pass in the data if they have it or false if they don't. It also
changes the DAGCombine to use that data to make the right decision when
creating the new load.
llvm-svn: 214449
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DAGCombine may choose to rewrite graphs where two loads feed a select into
graphs where a select of two addresses feed a load. While it sanity checks the
loads to make sure they are broadly equivalent it currently just uses the
alignment restriction of the left node. In cases where the right node has
stronger alignment requiresment this may lead to bad codegen, such as generating
an aligned load where an unaligned load is required. This patch makes the
combine generate a load with an alignment that is the same as whichever is more
restrictive of the two alignments.
Tests included.
rdar://17762530
llvm-svn: 214322
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
inspection in the proccess, and shuffle the logging in the DAG combiner
around a bit.
With this it is much easier to follow what the legalizer is doing. It
should even accurately present most of the strange legalization
operations where a single node is replaced by multiple nodes, etc. There
is still some information lost (we log SDNodes not SDValues so we don't
log which result is used for which thing), but I think this is much
closer to a usable system. Notably, this will make it *much* more
apparant when legalization is actually happening inside the combiner, or
when there is a cycle caused by interactions of the legalizer and the
combiner.
The "bug" I fixed here I'm not sure is remotely possible to trigger. We
were only adding one of the nodes in a replacement to the updated set
rather than all of the nodes in the replacement. Realistically, the
worst result of this are nodes not getting back onto the worklist in the
DAG combiner. I doubt it is possible to trigger this today, and
I certainly don't have any ideas about how, but this at least brings the
code into alignment with the principled operation of the routine.
llvm-svn: 214105
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
over each node in the worklist prior to combining.
This allows the combiner to produce new nodes which need to go back
through legalization. This is particularly useful when generating
operands to target specific nodes in a post-legalize DAG combine where
the operands are significantly easier to express as pre-legalized
operations. My immediate use case will be PSHUFB formation where we need
to build a constant shuffle mask with a build_vector node.
This also refactors the relevant functionality in the legalizer to
support this, and updates relevant tests. I've spoken to the R600 folks
and these changes look like improvements to them. The avx512 change
needs to be investigated, I suspect there is a disagreement between the
legalizer and the DAG combiner there, but it seems a minor issue so
leaving it to be re-evaluated after this patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4564
llvm-svn: 214020
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 213928
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with a result number outside the range of results for the node.
I don't know how we managed to not really check this very basic
invariant for so long, but the code is *very* broken at this point.
I have over 270 test failures with the assert enabled. I'm committing it
disabled so that others can join in the cleanup effort and reproduce the
issues. I've also included one of the obvious fixes that I already
found. More fixes to come.
llvm-svn: 213926
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
which have successfully round-tripped through the combine phase, and use
this to ensure all operands to DAG nodes are visited by the combiner,
even if they are only added during the combine phase.
This is critical to have the combiner reach nodes that are *introduced*
during combining. Previously these would sometimes be visited and
sometimes not be visited based on whether they happened to end up on the
worklist or not. Now we always run them through the combiner.
This fixes quite a few bad codegen test cases lurking in the suite while
also being more principled. Among these, the TLS codegeneration is
particularly exciting for programs that have this in the critical path
like TSan-instrumented binaries (although I think they engineer to use
a different TLS that is faster anyways).
I've tried to check for compile-time regressions here by running llc
over a merged (but not LTO-ed) clang bitcode file and observed at most
a 3% slowdown in llc. Given that this is essentially a worst case (none
of opt or clang are running at this phase) I think this is tolerable.
The actual LTO case should be even less costly, and the cost in normal
compilation should be negligible.
With this combining logic, it is possible to re-legalize as we combine
which is necessary to implement PSHUFB formation on x86 as
a post-legalize DAG combine (my ultimate goal).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4638
llvm-svn: 213898
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to enable the preservation of noalias function parameter information
after inlining, and the representation of block-level __restrict__ pointer
information (etc.), additional kinds of aliasing metadata will be introduced.
This metadata needs to be carried around in AliasAnalysis::Location objects
(and MMOs at the SDAG level), and so we need to generalize the current scheme
(which is hard-coded to just one TBAA MDNode*).
This commit introduces only the necessary refactoring to allow for the
introduction of other aliasing metadata types, but does not actually introduce
any (that will come in a follow-up commit). What it does introduce is a new
AAMDNodes structure to hold all of the aliasing metadata nodes associated with
a particular memory-accessing instruction, and uses that structure instead of
the raw MDNode* in AliasAnalysis::Location, etc.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 213859
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The target-independent DAGcombiner will generate:
asr w1, X, #31 w1 = splat sign bit.
add X, X, w1, lsr #28 X = X + 0 or pow2-1
asr w0, X, asr #4 w0 = X/pow2
However, the add + shifts is expensive, so generate:
add w0, X, 15 w0 = X + pow2-1
cmp X, wzr X - 0
csel X, w0, X, lt X = (X < 0) ? X + pow2-1 : X;
asr w0, X, asr 4 w0 = X/pow2
llvm-svn: 213758
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
insertions.
The old behavior could cause arbitrarily bad memory usage in the DAG
combiner if there was heavy traffic of adding nodes already on the
worklist to it. This commit switches the DAG combine worklist to work
the same way as the instcombine worklist where we null-out removed
entries and only add new entries to the worklist. My measurements of
codegen time shows slight improvement. The memory utilization is
unsurprisingly dominated by other factors (the IR and DAG itself
I suspect).
This change results in subtle, frustrating churn in the particular order
in which DAG combines are applied which causes a number of minor
regressions where we fail to match a pattern previously matched by
accident. AFAICT, all of these should be using AddToWorklist to directly
or should be written in a less brittle way. None of the changes seem
drastically bad, and a few of the changes seem distinctly better.
A major change required to make this work is to significantly harden the
way in which the DAG combiner handle nodes which become dead
(zero-uses). Previously, we relied on the ability to "priority-bump"
them on the combine worklist to achieve recursive deletion of these
nodes and ensure that the frontier of remaining live nodes all were
added to the worklist. Instead, I've introduced a routine to just
implement that precise logic with no indirection. It is a significantly
simpler operation than that of the combiner worklist proper. I suspect
this will also fix some other problems with the combiner.
I think the x86 changes are really minor and uninteresting, but the
avx512 change at least is hiding a "regression" (despite the test case
being just noise, not testing some performance invariant) that might be
looked into. Not sure if any of the others impact specific "important"
code paths, but they didn't look terribly interesting to me, or the
changes were really minor. The consensus in review is to fix any
regressions that show up after the fact here.
Thanks to the other reviewers for checking the output on other
architectures. There is a specific regression on ARM that Tim already
has a fix prepped to commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4616
llvm-svn: 213727
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'Worklist' consistently rather than a deeply confusing mixture of
'WorkList' and 'Worklist'.
Notably, the very 'WorkList' of the DAG combiner was exposed to target
specific DAG combines under an interface 'AddToWorklist' which was
implemented by in turn calling 'AddToWorkList' in the combiner. This has
sent me circling with the wrong case in grep one too many times.
I chose to normalize on 'Worklist' because that one won the grep-vote
for llvm/lib/... by a hundered hits or so, and it is used in places
relatively "canonical" such as InstCombine's Worklist. Let's all jsut
pick this casing, whether "correct", "good", or "bad" and be
consistent...
llvm-svn: 213506
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
stack, filter all handle nodes from the DAG combiner worklist.
This will also handle cases where other handle nodes might be
(erroneously) added to the worklist and then cause bugs and explosions
when deleted. For example, when running the legalizer within the DAG
combiner, there are times when other handle nodes are used and can end
up here.
llvm-svn: 213505
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Canonicalize shuffles according to rules:
* shuffle(A, shuffle(A, B)) -> shuffle(shuffle(A,B), A)
* shuffle(B, shuffle(A, B)) -> shuffle(shuffle(A,B), B)
* shuffle(B, shuffle(A, Undef)) -> shuffle(shuffle(A, Undef), B)
This patch helps identifying more shuffle pairs that could be combined reusing
the already existing rules in the DAGCombiner.
Added new test 'combine-vec-shuffle-5.ll' to verify that the canonicalized
shuffles are now folded into a single shuffle node by the DAGCombiner.
Added more test cases to 'combine-vec-shuffle-4.ll'.
llvm-svn: 213504
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
computation."
There's a bug where this can create cycles in the DAG. It will take a bit
to fix, so I'm backing it out for now.
llvm-svn: 213339
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It turns out that in most cases (the main exception being i1-related
types) once these operations are formed we cannot separate them and
the targets end up having to deal with them whether they want to or
not.
This is not a good situation, and a more reasonable default can be
formed by ackowledging this and having targets leave them as Legal.
Only x86 seems to be affected (other targets don't even try marking
the operation Expand).
Mostly there's no visible change here yet, but it will be useful to
have truly expanded EXTLOADS for MVT::f16 softening support.
llvm-svn: 213162
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds two new rules to the DAGCombiner:
1. shuffle (shuffle A, Undef, M0), B, M1 -> shuffle A, B, M2
2. shuffle (shuffle A, Undef, M0), A, M1 -> shuffle A, Undef, M2
We only do this if the combined shuffle is legal for the target.
Example:
;;
define <4 x float> @test(<4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) {
%1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %a, <4 x float> undef, <4 x i32><i32 6, i32 0, i32 1, i32 7>
%2 = shufflevector <4 x float> %1, <4 x float> %b, <4 x i32><i32 1, i32 2, i32 4, i32 5>
ret <4 x i32> %2
}
;;
(using llc -mcpu=corei7 -march=x86-64)
Before, the x86 backend generated:
pshufd $120, %xmm0, %xmm0
shufps $-108, %xmm0, %xmm1
movaps %xmm1, %xmm0
Now the x86 backend generates:
movsd %xmm1, %xmm0
llvm-svn: 213069
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes a crasher in method 'DAGCombiner::visitOR' due to an invalid
call to method 'isShuffleMaskLegal'. On x86, method 'isShuffleMaskLegal'
always expects a legal vector value type in input.
With this patch, we immediately check if the input OR dag node has a legal
vector type; we only try to fold a OR dag node into a single shufflevector
if we know that the resulting shuffle will have a legal type.
This is to avoid calling method 'isShuffleMaskLegal' on a potentially
illegal vector value type.
Added a new test-case to file 'CodeGen/X86/combine-or.ll' to verify that
DAGCombiner doesn't crash in the attempt to check/combine an OR between shuffles
with illegal types.
llvm-svn: 213020
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch teaches the DAGCombiner how to fold a pair of shuffles
according to rules:
1. shuffle(shuffle A, B, M0), B, M1) -> shuffle(A, B, M2)
2. shuffle(shuffle A, B, M0), A, M1) -> shuffle(A, B, M3)
The new rules would only trigger if the resulting shuffle has legal type and
legal mask.
Added test 'combine-vec-shuffle-3.ll' to verify that DAGCombiner correctly
folds shuffles on x86 when the resulting mask is legal. Also added some negative
cases to verify that we avoid introducing illegal shuffles.
llvm-svn: 213001
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
trying to fold shuffles.
Verify that DAGCombiner does not crash when trying to fold a pair of shuffles
according to rule (added at r212539):
(shuffle (shuffle A, Undef, M0), Undef, M1) -> (shuffle A, Undef, M2)
The DAGCombiner avoids folding shuffles if the resulting shuffle dag node
is not legal for the target. That means, the resulting shuffle must have
legal type and legal mask.
Before, the DAGCombiner only called method
'TargetLowering::isShuffleMaskLegal' to check if it was "safe" to fold according
to the above-mentioned rule. However, this caused a crash in the x86 backend
since method 'isShuffleMaskLegal' always expects to be called on a
legal vector type.
llvm-svn: 212915
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(trunc b) combine.""
Don't try to convert the select condition type.
llvm-svn: 212750
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
into a single shuffle if the resulting mask is legal.
This patch teaches the DAGCombiner how to fold shuffles according to the
following new rules:
1. shuffle(shuffle(x, y), undef) -> x
2. shuffle(shuffle(x, y), undef) -> y
3. shuffle(shuffle(x, y), undef) -> shuffle(x, undef)
4. shuffle(shuffle(x, y), undef) -> shuffle(y, undef)
The backend avoids to combine shuffles according to rules 3. and 4. if
the resulting shuffle does not have a legal mask. This is to avoid introducing
illegal shuffles that are potentially expanded into a sub-optimal sequence of
target specific dag nodes during vector legalization.
Added test case combine-vec-shuffle-2.ll to verify that we correctly triggers
the new rules when combining shuffles.
llvm-svn: 212748
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
combine."
This caused miscompilation on, at least, x86-64. SExt(i1 cond) confused other optimizations.
llvm-svn: 212708
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
getBooleanContents()
Summary:
On MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6, floating point comparisons return 0 or -1 but integer
comparisons return 0 or 1.
Updated the various uses of getBooleanContents. Two simplifications had to be
disabled when float and int boolean contents differ:
- ScalarizeVecRes_VSELECT except when the kind of boolean contents is trivially
discoverable (i.e. when the condition of the VSELECT is a SETCC node).
- visitVSELECT (select C, 0, 1) -> (xor C, 1).
Come to think of it, this one could test for the common case of 'C'
being a SETCC too.
Preserved existing behaviour for all other targets and updated the affected
MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6 tests. This also fixes the pi benchmark where the 'low'
variable was counting in the wrong direction because it thought it could simply
add the result of the comparison.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, jholewinski, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4389
llvm-svn: 212697
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
build_vector.
llvm-svn: 212677
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Do this if the truncate is free and the select is legal.
llvm-svn: 212640
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tracks which elements of the build vector are in fact undef.
This should make actually inpsecting them (likely in my next patch)
reasonably pretty. Also makes the output parameter optional as it is
clear now that *most* users are happy with undefs in their splats.
llvm-svn: 212581
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
resulting mask is legal.
This patch teaches how to fold a shuffle according to rule:
shuffle (shuffle (x, undef, M0), undef, M1) -> shuffle(x, undef, M2)
We do this only if the resulting mask M2 is legal; this is to avoid introducing
illegal shuffles that are potentially expanded into a sub-optimal sequence
of target specific dag nodes.
This patch has the advantage of being target independent, since it works on ISD
nodes. Therefore, all targets (not only x86) can take advantage of this rule.
The idea behind this patch is that most shuffle pairs can be safely combined
before we run the legalizer on vector operations. This allows us to
combine/simplify dag nodes earlier in the process and not only immediately
before instruction selection stage.
That said. This patch is not meant to replace any existing target specific
combine rules; backends might still introduce new shuffles during legalization
stage. Also, this rule is very simple and avoids to aggressively optimize
shuffles.
llvm-svn: 212539
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
nodes about whether they are splats. This is factored out and improved
from r212324 which got reverted as it was far too aggressive. The new
API should help more conservatively handle buildvectors that are
a mixture of splatted and undef values.
No functionality change at this point. The hope is to slowly
re-introduce the undef-tolerant optimization of splats, but each time
being forced to make a concious decision about how to handle the undefs
in a way that doesn't lead to contradicting assumptions about the
collapsed value.
Hal has pointed out in discussions that this may not end up being the
desired API and instead it may be more convenient to get a mask of the
undef elements or something similar. I'm starting simple and will expand
the API as I adapt actual callers and see exactly what they need.
llvm-svn: 212514
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lanes in vector splats.
The core problem here is that undef lanes can't *unilaterally* be
considered to contribute to splats. Their handling needs to be more
cautious. There is also a reported failure of the nightly testers
(thanks Tobias!) that may well stem from the same core issue. I'm going
to fix this theoretical issue, factor the APIs a bit better, and then
verify that I don't see anything bad with Tobias's reduction from the
test suite before recommitting.
Original commit message for r212324:
[x86] Generalize BuildVectorSDNode::getConstantSplatValue to work for
any constant, constant FP, or undef splat and to tolerate any undef
lanes in a splat, then replace all uses of isSplatVector in X86's
lowering with it.
This fixes issues where undef lanes in an otherwise splat vector would
prevent the splat logic from firing. It is a touch more awkward to use
this interface, but it is much more accurate. Suggestions for better
interface structuring welcome.
With this fix, the code generated with the widening legalization
strategy for widen_cast-4.ll is *dramatically* improved as the special
lowering strategies for a v16i8 SRA kick in even though the high lanes
are undef.
We also get a slightly different choice for broadcasting an aligned
memory location, and use vpshufd instead of vbroadcastss. This looks
like a minor win for pipelining and domain crossing, but a minor loss
for the number of micro-ops. I suspect its a wash, but folks can
easily tweak the lowering if they want.
llvm-svn: 212475
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
any constant, constant FP, or undef splat and to tolerate any undef
lanes in a splat, then replace all uses of isSplatVector in X86's
lowering with it.
This fixes issues where undef lanes in an otherwise splat vector would
prevent the splat logic from firing. It is a touch more awkward to use
this interface, but it is much more accurate. Suggestions for better
interface structuring welcome.
With this fix, the code generated with the widening legalization
strategy for widen_cast-4.ll is *dramatically* improved as the special
lowering strategies for a v16i8 SRA kick in even though the high lanes
are undef.
We also get a slightly different choice for broadcasting an aligned
memory location, and use vpshufd instead of vbroadcastss. This looks
like a minor win for pipelining and domain crossing, but a minor loss
for the number of micro-ops. I suspect its a wash, but folks can easily
tweak the lowering if they want.
llvm-svn: 212324
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The PowerPC 128-bit long double data type (ppcf128 in LLVM) is in fact a
pair of two doubles, where one is considered the "high" or
more-significant part, and the other is considered the "low" or
less-significant part. When a ppcf128 value is stored in memory or a
register pair, the high part always comes first, i.e. at the lower
memory address or in the lower-numbered register, and the low part
always comes second. This is true both on big-endian and little-endian
PowerPC systems. (Similar to how with a complex number, the real part
always comes first and the imaginary part second, no matter the byte
order of the system.)
This was implemented incorrectly for little-endian systems in LLVM.
This commit fixes three related issues:
- When printing an immediate ppcf128 constant to assembler output
in emitGlobalConstantFP, emit the high part first on both big-
and little-endian systems.
- When lowering a ppcf128 type to a pair of f64 types in SelectionDAG
(which is used e.g. when generating code to load an argument into a
register pair), use correct low/high part ordering on little-endian
systems.
- In a related issue, because lowering ppcf128 into a pair of f64 must
operate differently from lowering an int128 into a pair of i64,
bitcasts between ppcf128 and int128 must not be optimized away by the
DAG combiner on little-endian systems, but must effect a word-swap.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 212274
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
y)) for vectors"
This reverts commit r210540, adds a testcase for the regression it
caused, and marks the R600 test it was supposed to fix as XFAIL.
llvm-svn: 210792
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The SelectionDAG bad a special case for ISD::SELECT_CC, where it would
allow targets to specify:
setOperationAction(ISD::SELECT_CC, MVT::Other, Expand);
to indicate that they wanted to expand ISD::SELECT_CC for all types.
This wasn't applied correctly everywhere, and it makes writing new
DAG patterns with ISD::SELECT_CC difficult.
llvm-svn: 210541
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vectors
This prevents a future commit from regressing:
test/CodeGen/R600/setcc-equivalent.ll
llvm-svn: 210540
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds new target specific combine rules to identify horizontal
add/sub idioms from BUILD_VECTOR dag nodes.
This patch also teaches the DAGCombiner how to canonicalize sequences of
insert_vector_elt dag nodes according to the following rule:
(insert_vector_elt (insert_vector_elt A, I0), I1) ->
(insert_vecto_elt (insert_vector_elt A, I1), I0)
This new canonicalization rule only triggers if the inner insert_vector
dag node has exactly one use; also, both indices must be known constants,
and I1 < I0.
This last rule made it possible to write a simpler algorithm to identify
horizontal add/sub patterns because now we don't have to worry about the
ordering of insert_vector_elt dag nodes.
llvm-svn: 210477
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch modifies SelectionDAGBuilder to construct SDNodes with associated
NoSignedWrap, NoUnsignedWrap and Exact flags coming from IR BinaryOperator
instructions.
Added a new SDNode type called 'BinaryWithFlagsSDNode' to allow accessing
nsw/nuw/exact flags during codegen.
Patch by Marcello Maggioni.
llvm-svn: 210467
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
legalization when promoting nodes with illegal vector type.
This patch teaches the backend how to simplify/canonicalize dag node
sequences normally introduced by the backend when promoting certain dag nodes
with illegal vector type.
This patch adds two new combine rules:
1) fold (shuffle (bitcast (BINOP A, B)), Undef, <Mask>) ->
(shuffle (BINOP (bitcast A), (bitcast B)), Undef, <Mask>)
2) fold (BINOP (shuffle (A, Undef, <Mask>)), (shuffle (B, Undef, <Mask>))) ->
(shuffle (BINOP A, B), Undef, <Mask>).
Both rules are only triggered on the type-legalized DAG.
In particular, rule 1. is a target specific combine rule that attempts
to sink a bitconvert into the operands of a binary operation.
Rule 2. is a target independet rule that attempts to move a shuffle
immediately after a binary operation.
llvm-svn: 209930
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
If both vector args to vselect are concat_vectors and the condition is
constant and picks half a vector from each argument, convert the vselect
into a concat_vectors.
Added a test.
The ConvertSelectToConcatVector is assuming it doesn't get vselects with
arguments of, for example, <undef, undef, true, true>. Those get taken
care of in the checks above its call.
Reviewers: nadav, delena, grosbach, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3916
llvm-svn: 209929
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An address only use of an extract element of a load can be simplified to a
load. Without this the result of the extract element is spilled to the
stack so that an address is available.
llvm-svn: 209788
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
value is live"
This reverts r208640 (I've just XFAILed the test) because it broke ppc64/Linux
self-hosting. Because nearly every regression test triggers a segfault, I hope
this will be easy to fix.
llvm-svn: 209747
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
inappropriate since it lost its Mask parameter in r154011.
llvm-svn: 208811
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Right now the load may not get DCE'd because of the side-effect of updating
the base pointer.
This can happen if we lower a read-modify-write of an illegal larger type
(e.g. i48) such that the modification only affects one of the subparts (the
lower i32 part but not the higher i16 part). See the testcase.
In order to spot the dead load we need to revisit it when SimplifyDemandedBits
decided that the value of the load is masked off. This is the
CommitTargetLoweringOpt piece.
I checked compile time with ARM64 by sending SPEC bitcode files through llc.
No measurable change.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16031651>
llvm-svn: 208640
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 207850
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For pattern like ((x >> C1) & Mask) << C2, DAG combiner may convert it
into (x >> (C1-C2)) & (Mask << C2), which makes pattern matching of ubfx
more difficult.
For example:
Given
%shr = lshr i64 %x, 4
%and = and i64 %shr, 15
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [8 x [64 x i64]]* @arr, i64 0, %i64 2, i64 %and
%0 = load i64* %arrayidx
With current shift folding, it takes 3 instrs to compute base address:
lsr x8, x0, #1
and x8, x8, #0x78
add x8, x9, x8
If using ubfx, it only needs 2 instrs:
ubfx x8, x0, #4, #4
add x8, x9, x8, lsl #3
This fixes bug 19589
llvm-svn: 207702
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 207583
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
ArrayRef<SDValue>
llvm-svn: 207383
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 207376
|
