| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The general Function::hasAddressTaken has two issues that make it
inappropriate for our purposes:
1. it is sensitive to dead constant users (PR43858 / crbug.com/1019970),
leading to different codegen when debu info is enabled
2. it considers direct calls via a function cast to be address escapes
The first is fixable, but the second is not, because IPO clients rely on
this behavior. They assume this function means that all call sites are
analyzable for IPO purposes.
So, implement our own analysis, which gets closer to finding functions
that may be indirect call targets.
Reviewers: ajpaverd, efriedma, hans
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69676
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
A new function pass (Transforms/CFGuard/CFGuard.cpp) inserts CFGuard checks on
indirect function calls, using either the check mechanism (X86, ARM, AArch64) or
or the dispatch mechanism (X86-64). The check mechanism requires a new calling
convention for the supported targets. The dispatch mechanism adds the target as
an operand bundle, which is processed by SelectionDAG. Another pass
(CodeGen/CFGuardLongjmp.cpp) identifies and emits valid longjmp targets, as
required by /guard:cf. This feature is enabled using the `cfguard` CC1 option.
Reviewers: thakis, rnk, theraven, pcc
Subscribers: ychen, hans, metalcanine, dmajor, tomrittervg, alex, mehdi_amini, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65761
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adds option /guard:cf to clang-cl and -cfguard to cc1 to emit function IDs
of functions that have their address taken into a section named .gfids$y for
compatibility with Microsoft's Control Flow Guard feature.
The original patch didn't have the lit.local.cfg file that restricts the new
test to x86, thus the new test was failing on the non-x86 bots.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40531
The reverts r322008, which was a revert of r322005.
This reverts commit a05b89f9aca70597dc79fe97bc49b50b51f525ba.
llvm-svn: 322136
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new test fails on the Hexagon bot. Reverting while I investigate.
This reverts https://reviews.llvm.org/rL322005
This reverts commit b7e0026b4385180c378edc658ec91a39566f2942.
llvm-svn: 322008
|
|
|
Adds option /guard:cf to clang-cl and -cfguard to cc1 to emit function IDs
of functions that have their address taken into a section named .gfids$y for
compatibility with Microsoft's Control Flow Guard feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40531
llvm-svn: 322005
|
