| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions.
DWARF specifies that "line 0" really means "no appropriate source
location" in the line table. By default, use this for branch targets
and some other cases that have no specified source location, to
prevent inheriting unfortunate line numbers from physically preceding
instructions (which might be from completely unrelated source).
Updated patch allows enabling or suppressing this behavior for all
unspecified source locations.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24180
llvm-svn: 289468
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so we can stop using DW_OP_bit_piece with the wrong semantics.
The entire back story can be found here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161114/405934.html
The gist is that in LLVM we've been misinterpreting DW_OP_bit_piece's
offset field to mean the offset into the source variable rather than
the offset into the location at the top the DWARF expression stack. In
order to be able to fix this in a subsequent patch, this patch
introduces a dedicated DW_OP_LLVM_fragment operation with the
semantics that we used to apply to DW_OP_bit_piece, which is what we
actually need while inside of LLVM. This patch is complete with a
bitcode upgrade for expressions using the old format. It does not yet
fix the DWARF backend to use DW_OP_bit_piece correctly.
Implementation note: We discussed several options for implementing
this, including reserving a dedicated field in DIExpression for the
fragment size and offset, but using an custom operator at the end of
the expression works just fine and is more efficient because we then
only pay for it when we need it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27361
rdar://problem/29335809
llvm-svn: 288683
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
instrumented code. also revert r288299 which was a workaround for the problem.
llvm-svn: 288300
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instructions.
The LLDB tests are now ready for this patch.
DWARF specifies that "line 0" really means "no appropriate source
location" in the line table. Use this for branch targets and some
other cases that have no specified source location, to prevent
inheriting unfortunate line numbers from physically preceding
instructions (which might be from completely unrelated source).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24180
llvm-svn: 288283
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 288216
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DWARF specifies that "line 0" really means "no appropriate source
location" in the line table. Use this for branch targets and some
other cases that have no specified source location, to prevent
inheriting unfortunate line numbers from physically preceding
instructions (which might be from completely unrelated source).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24180
llvm-svn: 288212
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added support for:
1. Multi dimension array.
2. Array of structure type, which previously was declared incompletely.
3. Dynamic size array.
4. Array where element type is a typedef, volatile or constant (this should resolve PR28311).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21526
llvm-svn: 275167
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 261234
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a class has hidden visibility all derived classes and all classes
that have it as a member must have hidden visibility too. That may
be fixable here but requires changes to quite a lot of debug info
classes.
This is also one of the things that GCC enforces aggressively while
clang ignores it, making testing more annoying than necessary.
llvm-svn: 260529
|
|
|
Summary:
Refactor common value, scope, and label tracking logic out of DwarfDebug
into a common base class called DebugHandlerBase.
Update an old LLVM IR test case to avoid an assertion in LexicalScopes.
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16931
llvm-svn: 260432
|
