Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | [LazyBFI] Fix typos | Adam Nemet | 2017-02-14 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | llvm-svn: 295073 | ||||
* | [BPI] Add new LazyBPI analysis | Adam Nemet | 2016-07-28 | 1 | -8/+7 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: The motivation is the same as in D22141: In order to add the hotness attribute to optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all passes that emit optimization remarks. BFI depends on BPI so unless we make this lazy as well we would still compute BPI unconditionally. The solution is to use the new LazyBPI pass in LazyBFI and only compute BPI when computation of BFI is requested by the client. I extended the laziness test using a LoopDistribute test to also cover BPI. Reviewers: hfinkel, davidxl Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22835 llvm-svn: 277083 | ||||
* | [BFI] Add new LazyBFI analysis pass | Adam Nemet | 2016-07-13 | 1 | -0/+68 |
Summary: This is necessary for D21771. In order to add the hotness attribute to optimization remarks we need BFI to be available in all passes that emit optimization remarks. However we don't want to pay for computing BFI unless the hotness attribute is requested. This is achieved by making BFI lazy at the very high-level through a new analysis pass -- BFI is not calculated unless requested. I am adding a test to check the laziness under D21771 where the first user of the analysis is added. Reviewers: hfinkel, dexonsmith, davidxl Subscribers: davidxl, dexonsmith, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22141 llvm-svn: 275250 |