summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Sink all InitializePasses.h includesReid Kleckner2019-11-131-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it caused lots of recompilation. I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the current checkout: recompiles touches affected_files header 342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h 314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h 307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h 213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h 170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h 162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h 158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h 140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h 137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h 131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in an incremental rebuild. Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
* Fix: Actually erase remove the elements from AssumeHandlesAditya Kumar2019-10-021-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Reviewers: sdmitriev, tejohnson Reviewed by: tejohnson Subscribers: llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68318 llvm-svn: 373494
* AssumptionCache: remove old affected values after RAUW.Tim Northover2019-08-161-2/+3
| | | | | | | | If they're left in the cache then they can't be removed efficiently when the cache is notified to unlink a @llvm.assume call, and that can lead to values from different functions entirely remaining there. llvm-svn: 369091
* [llvm] Migrate llvm::make_unique to std::make_uniqueJonas Devlieghere2019-08-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo. llvm-svn: 369013
* [CodeExtractor] Update function's assumption cache after extracting blocks ↵Sergey Dmitriev2019-02-081-2/+26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | from it Summary: Assumption cache's self-updating mechanism does not correctly handle the case when blocks are extracted from the function by the CodeExtractor. As a result function's assumption cache may have stale references to the llvm.assume calls that were moved to the outlined function. This patch fixes this problem by removing extracted llvm.assume calls from the function’s assumption cache. Reviewers: hfinkel, vsk, fhahn, davidxl, sanjoy Reviewed By: hfinkel, vsk Subscribers: llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57215 llvm-svn: 353500
* Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth2019-01-191-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
* [Analysis, Transforms] Fix some Clang-tidy modernize and Include What You ↵Eugene Zelenko2017-09-011-6/+19
| | | | | | Use warnings; other minor fixes (NFC). llvm-svn: 312383
* [IR][AssumptionCache] Add m_Shift and m_BitwiseLogic matchers to replace a ↵Craig Topper2017-06-241-9/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | couple m_CombineOr Summary: m_CombineOr isn't very efficient. The code using it is also quite verbose. This patch adds m_Shift and m_BitwiseLogic matchers to make the using code more concise and improve the match efficiency. Reviewers: spatel, davide Reviewed By: davide Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34593 llvm-svn: 306206
* Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFCSanjoy Das2017-05-011-3/+4
| | | | | | This relands r301424. llvm-svn: 301812
* Reverts commit r301424, r301425 and r301426Sanjoy Das2017-04-261-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | Commits were: "Use WeakVH instead of WeakTrackingVH in AliasSetTracker's UnkownInsts" "Add a new WeakVH value handle; NFC" "Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFC" The changes assumed pointers are 8 byte aligned on all architectures. llvm-svn: 301429
* Rename WeakVH to WeakTrackingVH; NFCSanjoy Das2017-04-261-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: I plan to use WeakVH to mean "nulls itself out on deletion, but does not track RAUW" in a subsequent commit. Reviewers: dblaikie, davide Reviewed By: davide Subscribers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, mcrosier, mzolotukhin, jfb, llvm-commits, nhaehnle Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32266 llvm-svn: 301424
* AssumptionCache: Disable the verifier by default, move it behind a hidden ↵Peter Collingbourne2017-02-151-5/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | cl::opt and verify from releaseMemory(). This is a short term solution to the problem that many passes currently fail to update the assumption cache. In the long term the verifier should not be controllable with a flag. We should either fix all passes to correctly update the assumption cache and enable the verifier unconditionally or somehow arrange for the assumption list to be updated automatically by passes. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30003 llvm-svn: 295236
* [ValueTracking] recognize a 'not' of an assumed condition as falseSanjay Patel2017-01-171-3/+5
| | | | | | | | Also, add the corresponding match to the AssumptionCache's 'Affected Values' list. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28485 llvm-svn: 292239
* Fix use-after-free bug in AffectedValueCallbackVH::allUsesReplacedWithHal Finkel2017-01-161-10/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | When transferring affected values in the cache from an old value, identified by the value of the current callback, to the specified new value we might need to insert a new entry into the DenseMap which constitutes the cache. Doing so might delete the current callback object. Move the copying logic into a new function, a member of the assumption cache itself, so that we don't run into UB should the callback handle itself be removed mid-copy. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28749 llvm-svn: 292133
* Make processing @llvm.assume more efficient - Add affected values to the ↵Hal Finkel2017-01-111-0/+109
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | assumption cache Here's my second try at making @llvm.assume processing more efficient. My previous attempt, which leveraged operand bundles, r289755, didn't end up working: it did make assume processing more efficient but eliminating the assumption cache made ephemeral value computation too expensive. This is a more-targeted change. We'll keep the assumption cache, but extend it to keep a map of affected values (i.e. values about which an assumption might provide some information) to the corresponding assumption intrinsics. This allows ValueTracking and LVI to find assumptions relevant to the value being queried without scanning all assumptions in the function. The fact that ValueTracking started doing O(number of assumptions in the function) work, for every known-bits query, has become prohibitively expensive in some cases. As discussed during the review, this is a pragmatic fix that, longer term, will likely be replaced by a more-principled solution (perhaps based on an extended SSA form). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28459 llvm-svn: 291671
* Add files I seem to have dropped in my revert (r290086).Daniel Jasper2016-12-191-0/+140
| | | | | | Sorry! llvm-svn: 290087
* Remove the AssumptionCacheHal Finkel2016-12-151-140/+0
| | | | | | | | | After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less code... llvm-svn: 289756
* [PM] Change the static object whose address is used to uniquely identifyChandler Carruth2016-11-231-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | analyses to have a common type which is enforced rather than using a char object and a `void *` type when used as an identifier. This has a number of advantages. First, it at least helps some of the confusion raised in Justin Lebar's code review of why `void *` was being used everywhere by having a stronger type that connects to documentation about this. However, perhaps more importantly, it addresses a serious issue where the alignment of these pointer-like identifiers was unknown. This made it hard to use them in pointer-like data structures. We were already dodging this in dangerous ways to create the "all analyses" entry. In a subsequent patch I attempted to use these with TinyPtrVector and things fell apart in a very bad way. And it isn't just a compile time or type system issue. Worse than that, the actual alignment of these pointer-like opaque identifiers wasn't guaranteed to be a useful alignment as they were just characters. This change introduces a type to use as the "key" object whose address forms the opaque identifier. This both forces the objects to have proper alignment, and provides type checking that we get it right everywhere. It also makes the types somewhat less mysterious than `void *`. We could go one step further and introduce a truly opaque pointer-like type to return from the `ID()` static function rather than returning `AnalysisKey *`, but that didn't seem to be a clear win so this is just the initial change to get to a reliably typed and aligned object serving is a key for all the analyses. Thanks to Richard Smith and Justin Lebar for helping pick plausible names and avoid making this refactoring many times. =] And thanks to Sean for the super fast review! While here, I've tried to move away from the "PassID" nomenclature entirely as it wasn't really helping and is overloaded with old pass manager constructs. Now we have IDs for analyses, and key objects whose address can be used as IDs. Where possible and clear I've shortened this to just "ID". In a few places I kept "AnalysisID" to make it clear what was being identified. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27031 llvm-svn: 287783
* Consistently use FunctionAnalysisManagerSean Silva2016-08-091-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out cleanly. Thanks to David for the suggestion. llvm-svn: 278077
* [PM] Make the AnalysisManager parameter to run methods a reference.Chandler Carruth2016-03-111-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | This was originally a pointer to support pass managers which didn't use AnalysisManagers. However, that doesn't realistically come up much and the complexity of supporting it doesn't really make sense. In fact, *many* parts of the pass manager were just assuming the pointer was never null already. This at least makes it much more explicit and clear. llvm-svn: 263219
* [PM] Implement the final conclusion as to how the analysis IDs shouldChandler Carruth2016-03-111-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | work in the face of the limitations of DLLs and templated static variables. This requires passes that use the AnalysisBase mixin provide a static variable themselves. So as to keep their APIs clean, I've made these private and befriended the CRTP base class (which is the common practice). I've added documentation to AnalysisBase for why this is necessary and at what point we can go back to the much simpler system. This is clearly a better pattern than the extern template as it caught *numerous* places where the template magic hadn't been applied and things were "just working" but would eventually have broken mysteriously. llvm-svn: 263216
* [PM] Appease mingw32's auto-import DLL build with minimal tweaks, with fix ↵NAKAMURA Takumi2016-02-281-0/+2
| | | | | | | | for clang. char AnalysisBase::ID should be declared as extern and defined in one module. llvm-svn: 262188
* Revert r262185, "[PM] Appease mingw32's auto-import DLL build with minimal ↵NAKAMURA Takumi2016-02-281-2/+0
| | | | | | | | tweaks." I'll rework soon. llvm-svn: 262186
* [PM] Appease mingw32's auto-import DLL build with minimal tweaks.NAKAMURA Takumi2016-02-281-0/+2
| | | | | | char AnalysisBase::ID should be declared as extern and defined in one module. llvm-svn: 262185
* [PM] Introduce CRTP mixin base classes to help define passes andChandler Carruth2016-02-261-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | analyses in the new pass manager. These just handle really basic stuff: turning a type name into a string statically that is nice to print in logs, and getting a static unique ID for each analysis. Sadly, the format of passes in anonymous namespaces makes using their names in tests really annoying so I've customized the names of the no-op passes to keep tests sane to read. This is the first of a few simplifying refactorings for the new pass manager that should reduce boilerplate and confusion. llvm-svn: 262004
* [PM] Actually add the new pass manager support for the assumption cache.Chandler Carruth2015-01-221-0/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I had already factored this analysis specifically to enable doing this, but hadn't actually committed the necessary wiring to get at this from the new pass manager. This also nicely shows how the separate cache object can be directly managed by the new pass manager. This analysis didn't have any direct tests and so I've added a printer pass and a boring test case. I chose to print the i1 value which is being assumed rather than the call to llvm.assume as that seems much more useful for testing... but suggestions on an even better printing strategy welcome. My main goal was to make sure things actually work. =] llvm-svn: 226868
* [PM] Split the AssumptionTracker immutable pass into two separate APIs:Chandler Carruth2015-01-041-0/+125
a cache of assumptions for a single function, and an immutable pass that manages those caches. The motivation for this change is two fold. Immutable analyses are really hacks around the current pass manager design and don't exist in the new design. This is usually OK, but it requires that the core logic of an immutable pass be reasonably partitioned off from the pass logic. This change does precisely that. As a consequence it also paves the way for the *many* utility functions that deal in the assumptions to live in both pass manager worlds by creating an separate non-pass object with its own independent API that they all rely on. Now, the only bits of the system that deal with the actual pass mechanics are those that actually need to deal with the pass mechanics. Once this separation is made, several simplifications become pretty obvious in the assumption cache itself. Rather than using a set and callback value handles, it can just be a vector of weak value handles. The callers can easily skip the handles that are null, and eventually we can wrap all of this up behind a filter iterator. For now, this adds boiler plate to the various passes, but this kind of boiler plate will end up making it possible to port these passes to the new pass manager, and so it will end up factored away pretty reasonably. llvm-svn: 225131
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud