| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow-up to r371983. Referring to "this program" in the description of
the --version option in the documentation isn't exactly correct, because
the docs are not part of the program, and so "this program" doesn't
really refer to anything. This patch brings the other users of this
terminology into line with the new updates to llvm-size and
llvm-strings.
Reviewed by: alexshap, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67618
llvm-svn: 372107
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sphinx allows for definitions of command-line options using
`.. option <name>` and references to those options via `:option:<name>`.
However, it looks like there is no scoping of these options by default,
meaning that links can end up pointing to incorrect documents. See for
example the llvm-mca document, which contains references to -o that,
prior to this patch, pointed to a different document. What's worse is
that these links appear to be non-deterministic in which one is picked
(on my machine, some references end up pointing to opt, whereas on the
live docs, they point to llvm-dwarfdump, for example).
The fix is to add the .. program <name> tag. This essentially namespaces
the options (definitions and references) to the named program, ensuring
that the links are kept correct.
Reviwed by: andreadb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63873
llvm-svn: 364538
|
|
|
There was a stub for llvm-cxxfilt, but it didn't describe the options.
Additionally, it was in markdown, which was causing issues, so as
discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63211, this change replaces the
existing stub with an RST file.
Reviewed by: MaskRay, mattd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63722
llvm-svn: 364287
|
