| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previous ArchSpec tests didn't catch this bug since we never tested just the OS being out of date. Fixed the bug and covered this with a test that would catch this.
This was found when trying to load a core file where the core file was an ELF file with just the e_machine for architeture and where the ELF header had no OS set in the OSABI field of the e_ident. It wasn't merging the architecture with the target architecture correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61659
llvm-svn: 360292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
When we want to compare a ConstString against a string literal (or any other non-ConstString),
we currently have to explicitly turn the other string into a ConstString. This makes sense as
comparing ConstStrings against each other is only a fast pointer comparison.
However, currently we (rather incorrectly) use in several places in LLDB temporary ConstStrings when
we just want to compare a given ConstString against a hardcoded value, for example like this:
```
if (extension != ConstString(".oat") && extension != ConstString(".odex"))
```
Obviously this kind of defeats the point of ConstStrings. In the comparison above we would
construct two temporary ConstStrings every time we hit the given code. Constructing a
ConstString is relatively expensive: we need to go to the StringPool, take a read and possibly
an exclusive write-lock and then look up our temporary string in the string map of the pool.
So we do a lot of heavy work for essentially just comparing a <6 characters in two strings.
I initially wanted to just fix these issues by turning the temporary ConstString in static variables/
members, but that made the code much less readable. Instead I propose to add a new overload
for the ConstString comparison operator that takes a StringRef. This comparison operator directly
compares the ConstString content against the given StringRef without turning the StringRef into
a ConstString.
This means that the example above can look like this now:
```
if (extension != ".oat" && extension != ".odex")
```
It also no longer has to unlock/lock two locks and call multiple functions in other TUs for constructing
the temporary ConstString instances. Instead this should end up just being a direct string comparison
of the two given strings on most compilers.
This patch also directly updates all uses of temporary and short ConstStrings in LLDB to use this new
comparison operator. It also adds a some unit tests for the new and old comparison operator.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere, espindola, amccarth
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, amccarth
Subscribers: amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60667
llvm-svn: 359281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For some reason I had convinced myself that functions returning by
pointer or reference do not require recording their result. However,
after further considering I don't see how that could work, at least not
with the current implementation. Interestingly enough, the reproducer
instrumentation already (mostly) accounts for this, though the
lldb-instr tool did not.
This patch adds the missing macros and updates the lldb-instr tool.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60178
llvm-svn: 357639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently LLDB crashes when autocompleting a command that ends with a
backtick because the quote character wasn't handled. This fixes that and
adds a unit test for this function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59779
llvm-svn: 356927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move SBRegistry method registrations from SBReproducer.cpp into files
declaring the individual APIs, in order to reduce the memory consumption
during build and improve maintainability. The current humongous
SBRegistry constructor exhausts all memory on a NetBSD system with 4G
RAM + 4G swap, therefore making it impossible to build LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59427
llvm-svn: 356481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This file implements some general purpose data structures, and so it
belongs to the Utility module.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, JDevlieghere, clayborg, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, javed.absar, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58970
llvm-svn: 355509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are set of classes in Target that describe the parameters of a
process - e.g. it's PID, name, user id, and similar. However, since it
is a bare description of a process and contains no actual functionality,
there's nothing specifically that makes this appropriate for being in
Target -- it could just as well be describing a process on the host, or
some hypothetical virtual process that doesn't even exist.
To cement this, I'm moving these classes to Utility. It's possible that
we can find a better place for it in the future, but as it is neither
Host specific nor Target specific, Utility seems like the most appropriate
place for the time being.
After this there is only 2 remaining references to Target from Host,
which I'll address in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58842
llvm-svn: 355342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This creates an abstract base class called "UserIDResolver", which can
be implemented to provide user/group ID resolution capabilities for
various objects. Posix host implement a PosixUserIDResolver, which does
that using posix apis (getpwuid and friends). PlatformGDBRemote
forwards queries over the gdb-remote link, etc. ProcessInstanceInfo
class is refactored to make use of this interface instead of taking a
platform pointer as an argument. The base resolver class already
implements caching and thread-safety, so implementations don't have to
worry about that.
The main motivating factor for this was to remove external dependencies
from the ProcessInstanceInfo class (so it can be put next to
ProcessLaunchInfo and friends), but it has other benefits too:
- ability to test the user name caching code
- ability to test ProcessInstanceInfo dumping code
- consistent interface for user/group resolution between Platform and
Host classes.
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58167
llvm-svn: 355323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This behavior was originally added in rL252264 (git commit 76a7f365da)
in order to be extra careful with handling platforms like watchos and tvos.
However, as far as triples go, those two (and others) are treated as OSes and
not environments, so that should not really apply here.
Additionally, this behavior is incorrect and can lead to incorrect ArchSpecs.
Because android is specified as an environment and not an OS, not propogating
the environment can lead to modules and targets being misidentified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58664
llvm-svn: 354938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
These functions should always return the opposite of the
`Triple{Environment,OS,Vendor}WasSpecified` functions. Unspecified unknown is
the same as unspecified, which is why one set of functions should give us what
we want. It's possible to have specified unknown, which is why we can't just
rely on checking the enum values of vendor/os/environment. We must also ensure
that the names of these are empty and not "unknown".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58653
llvm-svn: 354933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pass dummy '.' as format string for Timer() rather than an empty string,
in order to silence gcc warnings about empty format string
(-Wformat-zero-length). The actual format string is irrelevant
to the test in question.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58680
llvm-svn: 354922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
error: default initialization of an object of const type 'const Pod'
without a user-provided default constructor
llvm-svn: 354602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This enables the function to be called with a StringRef without jumping
through any hoops. I rename the function to "PutStringAsRawHex8" to
honor the extended interface. I also remove ".c_str()" from any calls to
this function I could find.
llvm-svn: 353841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This adds support for auto-detection of path style to SymbolFileBreakpad
(similar to how r351328 did the same for DWARF). We guess each file
entry separately, as we have no idea which file came from which compile
units (and different compile units can have different path styles). The
breakpad generates should have already converted the paths to absolute
ones, so this guess should be reasonable accurate, but as always with
these kinds of things, it is hard to give guarantees about anything.
In an attempt to bring some unity to the path guessing logic, I move the
guessing logic from inside SymbolFileDWARF into the FileSpec class and
have both symbol files use it to implent their desired behavior.
Reviewers: clayborg, lemo, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: aprantl, markmentovai, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57895
llvm-svn: 353702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is part two of the reproducer instrumentation framework. It
contains the code to capture and replay function calls. The main user of
this framework will be the SB API layer.
For all the details refer to the RFC on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2019-January/014530.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56322
llvm-svn: 353324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the is serialization/deserialization part of the reproducer
instrumentation framework.
For all the details refer to the RFC on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2019-January/014530.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57714
llvm-svn: 353195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The test was using ASSERT_EQ instead of ASSERT_STREQ which meant we were
comparing string addresses instead of the actual string. This caused the
test to fail with with the sanitizers enabled.
llvm-svn: 352780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(useful, e.g. when reading 512-bits registers, a-la AVX-512).
<rdar://problem/46886288>
llvm-svn: 352639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test was supposed to be skipped on Windows but was using the wrong
macro name.
llvm-svn: 352556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds the file provider which is responsible for capturing
files used by LLDB.
When capturing a reproducer, we use a file collector that is very
similar to the one used in clang. For every file that we touch, we add
an entry with a mapping from its virtual to its real path. When we
decide to generate a reproducer we copy over the files and their
permission into to reproducer folder.
When replaying a reproducer, we load the VFS mapping and instantiate a
RedirectingFileSystem. The latter will transparently use the files
available in the reproducer.
I've tested this on two macOS machines with an artificial example.
Still, it is very likely that I missed some places where we (still) use
native file system calls. I'm hoping to flesh those out while testing
with more advanced examples. However, I will fix those things in
separate patches.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54617
llvm-svn: 352538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We use UUID::fromOptionalData to read UUID's from the Mach-O files, so UUID's
of all 0's are invalid UUID's.
We also get uuid's from debugserver, which need to match the file UUID's. So
we need an API that treats "000000000" as invalid as well. Added that and use it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57195
llvm-svn: 352122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I want to add 512-bits support but I first want to make sure I'm
not breaking anything obvious. This is the first of a series of commit
adding tests. The first oddity found is that Scalar from APInt(s)
always constructed signed. Maybe at some point we want to revisit
this, but at least now we have a test to document how the API behaves.
<rdar://problem/46886288>
llvm-svn: 352103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix fallout from r351501 in the reproducer unittest.
llvm-svn: 351524
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 350428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
instead of returning the architecture through by-ref argument and a
boolean value indicating success, we can just return the ArchSpec
directly. Since the ArchSpec already has an invalid state, it can be
used to denote the failure without the additional bool.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56129
llvm-svn: 350291
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 349971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Adding some test coverage while I'm around.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, zturner, clayborg, jingham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56017
llvm-svn: 349970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
These are general purpose "utility" classes, whose functionality is not
debugger-specific in any way. As such, I believe they belong in the
Utility module.
This doesn't break any particular dependency (yet), but it reduces the
number of Core dependencies across the board.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, teemperor, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55361
llvm-svn: 349157
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 348502
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 348440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch changes the way the reproducer is initialized. Rather than
making changes at run time we now do everything at initialization time.
To make this happen we had to introduce initializer options and their SB
variant. This allows us to tell the initializer that we're running in
reproducer capture/replay mode.
Because of this change we also had to alter our testing strategy. We
cannot reinitialize LLDB when using the dotest infrastructure. Instead
we use lit and invoke two instances of the driver.
Another consequence is that we can no longer enable capture or replay
through commands. This was bound to go away form the beginning, but I
had something in mind where you could enable/disable specific providers.
However this seems like it adds very little value right now so the
corresponding commands were removed.
Finally this change also means you now have to control this through the
driver, for which I replaced --reproducer with --capture and --replay to
differentiate between the two modes.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55038
llvm-svn: 348152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When I landed the initial reproducer framework I knew there were some
things that needed improvement. Rather than bundling it with a patch
that adds more functionality I split it off into this patch. I also
think the API is stable enough to add unit testing, which is included in
this patch as well.
Other improvements include:
- Refactor how we initialize the loader and generator.
- Improve naming consistency: capture and replay seems the least ambiguous.
- Index providers by name and make sure there's only one of each.
- Add convenience methods for creating and accessing providers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54616
llvm-svn: 347716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The DataExtractor class itself was moved to Utility some time ago, but
it seems this was not reflected in the location of the test code. Fix
that.
llvm-svn: 346867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The whole point of this change was making it possible to resolve paths
without depending on the FileSystem, which is not what I did here. Not
sure what I was thinking...
llvm-svn: 346466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to call real_path from the TildeExpressionResolver we need
access to the FileSystem. Since the resolver lives under utility we have
to pass in the FS.
llvm-svn: 346457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch removes the logic for resolving paths out of FileSpec and
updates call sites to rely on the FileSystem class instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53915
llvm-svn: 345890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: rnk, zturner, aleksandr.urakov
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53092
llvm-svn: 344798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch adds a framework for adding descriptions to the command completions we provide.
It also adds descriptions for completed top-level commands so that we can test this code.
Completions are in general supposed to be displayed alongside the completion itself. The descriptions
can be used to provide additional information about the completion to the user. Examples for descriptions
are function signatures when completing function calls in the expression command or the binary name
when providing completion for a symbol.
There is still some boilerplate code from the old completion API left in LLDB (mostly because the respective
APIs are reused for non-completion related purposes, so the CompletionRequest doesn't make sense to be
used), so that's why I still had to change some function signatures. Also, as the old API only passes around a
list of matches, and the descriptions are for these functions just another list, I had to add some code that
essentially just ensures that both lists are always the same side (e.g. all the manual calls to
`descriptions->AddString(X)` below a `matches->AddString(Y)` call).
The initial command descriptions that come with this patch are just reusing the existing
short help that is already added in LLDB.
An example completion with descriptions looks like this:
```
(lldb) pl
Available completions:
platform -- Commands to manage and create platforms.
plugin -- Commands for managing LLDB plugins.
```
Reviewers: #lldb, jingham
Reviewed By: #lldb, jingham
Subscribers: jingham, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51175
llvm-svn: 342181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
rdar://problem/43530233
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51445
llvm-svn: 341957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This class was initially in Host because its implementation used to be
very OS-specific. However, with C++11, it has become a very simple
std::condition_variable wrapper, with no host-specific code.
It is also a general purpose utility class, so it makes sense for it to
live in a place where it can be used by everyone.
This has no effect on the layering right now, but it enables me to later
move the Listener+Broadcaster+Event combo to a lower layer, which is
important, as these are used in a lot of places (notably for launching a
process in Host code).
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, teemperor
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: xiaobai, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50384
llvm-svn: 341089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: labath, #lldb
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: jloser, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50298
llvm-svn: 340448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the value if the key exists already
Summary:
This issue came up because it caused problems in our unit tests. The StringPool did connect counterparts only once and silently ignored the values passed in subsequent calls.
The simplest solution for the unit tests would be silent overwrite. In practice, however, it seems useful to assert that we never overwrite a different mangled counterpart.
If we ever have mangled counterparts for other languages than C++, this makes it more likely to notice collisions.
I added an assertion that allows the following cases:
* inserting a new value
* overwriting the empty string
* overwriting with an identical value
I fixed the unit tests, which used "random" strings and thus produced collisions.
It would be even better if there was a way to reset or isolate the StringPool, but that's a different story.
Reviewers: jingham, friss, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50536
llvm-svn: 339669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: It was not immediately clear to me whether or not non-null-terminated StringRef's are supported in ConstString and/or the counterpart mechanism. From this test it seems to be fine. Maybe useful to keep?
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50334
llvm-svn: 339292
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should have been a part of r339127, but I missed it somehow.
llvm-svn: 339136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular
dependency completely).
The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740
llvm-svn: 339127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
usage in Mangled::GetDemangledName()
Summary: `IsEmpty()` and `operator bool() == false` have equal semantics. Usage in Mangled::GetDemangledName() was incorrect. What it actually wants is a check for null-string. Split this off of D50071 and added a test to clarify usage.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Subscribers: erik.pilkington, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50327
llvm-svn: 339014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This should simplify the upcoming demangling patch (D50071). While I was
in there, I also added a quick test for the function.
llvm-svn: 338995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50293
llvm-svn: 338961
|