| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I was considering modifying this function, so I wrote some tests to make
sure I don't regress its behavior. I am not sure if I will actually
proceed with the modifications, but the tests seem useful nonetheless.
llvm-svn: 331966
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now incorrect type argument that looks like T<A><B> doesn't
cause an assert, but just a parsing error.
Bug: 36224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42939
llvm-svn: 324380
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34911 from Weng Xuetian.
llvm-svn: 307944
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 299729
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes incorrect behavior in avoid-stepping and sometimes messes
printing of thread backtrace.
This change implements more methodical parsing logic based on clang
lexer and simple recursive parser.
Examples:
void std::vector<Class, std::allocator<Class>>::_M_emplace_back_aux<Class const&>(Class const&)
void (*&std::_Any_data::_M_access<void (*)()>())()
Previous version of this change (D31451) was rolled back due to an issue
with Objective-C selectors being incorrectly recognized as a C++ identifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31451
llvm-svn: 299721
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This caused a failure in the test case:
functionalities/breakpoint/objc/TestObjCBreakpoints.py
When we are parsing up names we stick interesting parts of the names
in various buckets, one of which is the ObjC selector bucket. The new
C++ name parser must be interfering with this process somehow.
<rdar://problem/31439305>
llvm-svn: 299489
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes incorrect behavior in avoid-stepping and sometimes messes
printing of thread backtrace.
This change implements more methodical parsing logic based on clang
lexer and simple recursive parser.
Examples:
void std::vector<Class, std::allocator<Class>>::_M_emplace_back_aux<Class const&>(Class const&)
void (*&std::_Any_data::_M_access<void (*)()>())()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31451
llvm-svn: 299374
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
|
|
|
Summary:
CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName was not correctly parsing templated functions whose demangled name
included the return type -- the space before the function name was included in the "context" and
the context itself was not terminated correctly due to a misuse of the substr function (second
argument is length, not the end position). Fix that and add a regression test.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23608
llvm-svn: 279038
|
