| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The FXSAVE member `ftw` (FPU Tag Word) was given the wrong size (8-bit)
instead of the correct width (16-bit) as per the x87 Programmer's
Manual. Adjust this to ensure that we print out the complete value for
the register.
llvm-svn: 311579
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove some stray ';' that were in the source code. NFC.
llvm-svn: 311577
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 311245
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 311244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"Prevent negative chars from being sign-extended into isprint and isspace which take and int and crash if the int is negative"
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36620
llvm-svn: 311207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Another case of this was responsible for the whitespace conflict
in D34776.
llvm-svn: 311003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Enable i386 ABI creation for freebsd
* Added an extra argument in ABISysV_i386::PrepareTrivialCall for mmap
syscall
* Unlike linux, the last argument of mmap is actually 64-bit(off_t).
This requires us to push an additional word for the higher order bits.
* Prior to this change, ktrace dump will show mmap failures due to
invalid argument coming from the 6th mmap argument.
Patch by Karnajit Wangkhem
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34776
llvm-svn: 311002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It was completly unused and broke the part of the encapsulation that
common code shouldn't depend on specific plugins or language specific
features.
llvm-svn: 311000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
macOS 10.13 - High Sierra - internal layouts. Patch by
Sean Callanan.
<rdar://problem/33282015>
llvm-svn: 310959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To detect the correct function name based on the list of available symbols instead of the SDK version
Reviewers: tberghammer, clayborg
Subscribers: jaydeep, bhushan, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36445
llvm-svn: 310856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ELF section to LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS if SHF_ALLOC is not set.
Reviewers: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: jaydeep, bhushan, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35784
llvm-svn: 310855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the FreeBSD equivalent of r238549.
This serves 2 purposes:
* LLDB should handle inferior process signals SIGSEGV/SIGILL/SIGBUS/
SIGFPE the way it is suppose to be handled. Prior to this fix these
signals will neither create a coredump, nor exit from the debugger
or work for signal handling scenario.
* eInvalidCrashReason need not report "unknown crash reason" if we have
a valid si_signo
llvm.org/pr23699
Patch by Karnajit Wangkhem
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35223
llvm-svn: 310591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current LLDB (that is without DWZ support) crashes accessing Fedora debug info:
READ of size 8 at 0x60200000ffc8 thread T0
#0 in DWARFDebugInfoEntry::BuildAddressRangeTable(SymbolFileDWARF*, DWARFCompileUnit const*, DWARFDebugAranges*) const tools/lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFDebugInfoEntry.cpp:1336
Greg Clayton: We will need a warning to be emitted in
SymbolFileDWARF::CalculateAbilities() stating we won't parse the DWARF due to
"unsupported DW_FORM value of 0x1f20".
Patch has been mostly written by Greg Clayton.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35622
llvm-svn: 309581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Clang recently started to emit base address entries into the
.debug_ranges section to reduce the number of relocations needed. Lets
make sure LLDB can read them.
llvm-svn: 309554
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This enables libcompression when available in the CMake build system.
llvm-svn: 309395
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Subscribers: jaydeep, bhushan, lldb-commits, slthakur
llvm-svn: 309250
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a follow-up to r308905.
llvm-svn: 309019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
able to be found.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35734
llvm-svn: 308911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reapplies https://reviews.llvm.org/D35740 with a tweak to find
the section by name rather than type. Section types don't distinguish
between regular sections and their DWO counterparts.
llvm-svn: 308905
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r308850.
llvm-svn: 308851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The DWO handling code can get confused by clang modules which also use
skeleton CUs to point to the object file with the full debug
info. This patch detects whether an object is a "real" DWO or a clang
module and prevents LLDB from interpreting clang modules as DWO. This
fixes the regression in TestWithModuleDebugging.
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=33875
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35740
llvm-svn: 308850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cast to `const uint8_t *` instead of `uint8_t *` to avoid the warning
from GCC.
EmulationStateARM.cpp:206:34: warning: cast from type 'const void*' to type 'uint8_t* {aka unsigned char*}' casts away qualifiers [-Wcast-qual]
Cast to `const uint32_t *` and the explicitly cast away the const-ness
of the value. This seems pretty sketchy as the `DataExtractor` holds a
const reference to the data. However, this is no worse than before.
ObjectFilePECOFF.cpp:540:78: warning: cast from type 'const uint8_t* {aka const unsigned char*}' to type 'uint32_t* {aka unsigned int*}' casts away qualifiers [-Wcast-qual]
llvm-svn: 308489
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 308307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
It defined a couple of types (condition_t) which we don't use anymore,
as we have c++11 goodies now. I remove these definitions.
Also it unnecessarily included a couple of headers which weren't
necessary for it's operation. I remove these, and place the includes in
the relevant files (usually .cpp, usually in Host code) which use them.
This allows us to reduce namespace pollution in most of the lldb files
which don't need the OS-specific definitions.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham
Subscribers: ki.stfu, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35113
llvm-svn: 308304
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 308292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The usage of shared_from_this forces us to separate construction and
initialization phases, because shared_from_this() is not available in
the constructor (or destructor). The shared semantics are not necessary,
as we always have a clear owner of the native process class
(GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLDB object). Even if we need shared
semantics in the future (which I think we should strongly avoid),
reverting this will not be necessary -- the owners can still easily
store the native process object in a shared pointer if they really want
to -- this just prevents the knowledge of that from leaking into the
class implementation.
After this a NativeThread object will hold a reference to the parent
process (instead of a weak_ptr) -- having a process instance always
available allows us to simplify some logic in this class (some of it was
already simplified because we were asserting that the process is
available, but this makes it obvious).
Reviewers: krytarowski, eugene, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35123
llvm-svn: 308282
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 308219
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34911 from Weng Xuetian.
llvm-svn: 307944
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
InstrumentationRuntime breakpoints. (#235)
llvm-svn: 307881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch adds support for sending strings along with
error codes in the reply packets. The implementation is
based on the feedback recieved in the lldb-dev mailing
list. The patch also adds an extra packet for the client
to query if the server has the capability to provide
strings along with error replys.
Reviewers: labath, jingham, sas, lldb-commits, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34945
llvm-svn: 307768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Testing the value of type_code against the closed enum TypeCodes
provides statically verifiable completeness of testing. However, one
branch assigns to type_code by casting directly from a masked integer
value. This is currently handled by adding a default: case after
checking each TypeCodes instance. This patch introduces a bool variable
containing the "default" state value, allowing the switch to be
exhaustive, protect against future instances not being handled in the
switch, and preserves the original logic.
This addresses the warning:
warning: default label in switch which covers all enumeration values
[-Wcovered-switch-default]
As an issue of maintainability, the bitmask on line 524 handles the
current values of TypeCodes enum, but this will be invalid if the enum
is extended. This patch does not address this, and a more closed
conversion from cfinfoa -> TypeCodes would help protect against this.
Reviewers: spyffe, lhames, sas
Reviewed By: sas
Subscribers: sas, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35036
llvm-svn: 307712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In NativeProcessLinux::MonitorSIGTRAP we were asserting that the si_code
value is one of the codes we know about. However, that list was very
incomplete -- for example, we were not handling SI_TKILL/SI_USER,
generated by raise(SIGTRAP). A cursory examination show there are at
least a dozen codes like these that an app can generate, and more can be
added at any point.
So, instead of trying to play catchup, I change the default behavior to
treat an unknown si_code like an ordinary signal. The only reason we
needed to inspect si_code in the first place is because
watchpoint/breakpoints are notified as SIGTRAP, but we already know
about those, and us starting to use a new debug event is far less likely
than somebody introducing a new non-debug event.
I add a test case to TestRaise to verify we are handling raise(SIGTRAP)
in an application properly.
llvm-svn: 307644
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 307636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
On linux on ppc64le some of the enums in AuxVector have the same name
as macros defined in the system.
Reviewers: mikesart, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: joerg, gut, krytarowski, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35065
Patch by Bruno Rosa <bruno.rosa@eldorado.org.br>
llvm-svn: 307632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Tatyana Krasnukha
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34942
llvm-svn: 307512
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 307464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
blocks of memory, and if the final bytes of that block look like a long
x86 instruction, it can cause the llvm disassembler to read past the end
of the buffer. Use the maximum allowed instruction length that we pass
to the llvm disassembler as a way to limit this to the size of the buffer.
An example of how to trigger this is when lldb does a function call, it
puts a breakpoint on the beginning of main() and uses that as the return
address from the function call. When we stop at that location, lldb may
try to find the first frame up the stack. Because this is on the first
instruction of a function, it will get the word-size value at the stack
pointer and assume that this was the caller's pc value. But this is random
stack memory and could point to anything - an object in memory, something
in the data section, whatever. And if we have a symbol for that thing,
we'll try to disassemble it.
This was leading to infrequent crashes in customer scenarios; figured out
what was happening with address sanitizer.
<rdar://problem/30463256>
llvm-svn: 307454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This replaces the static functions used for creating
NativeProcessProtocol instances with a factory pattern, and modernizes
the interface of the new class in the process -- I use llvm::Expected
instead of the Status+value combo. I also move some of the common code
(like the Delegate registration into the base class). The new
arrangement has multiple benefits:
- it removes the NativeProcess*** dependency from Process/gdb-remote
(which for example means that liblldb no longer pulls in this code).
- it enables unit testing of the GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS class
(by providing a mock Native Process).
- serves as another example on how to use the llvm::Expected class (I
couldn't get rid of the Initialize-type functions completely here
because of the use of shared_from_this, but that's the next thing on
my list here)
Tests still pass on Linux and I've made sure NetBSD compiles after this.
Reviewers: zturner, eugene, krytarowski
Subscribers: srhines, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33778
llvm-svn: 307390
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 307161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
On older android targets, we needed a dlopen rename workaround to get
"process load" working. Since API 26 this is not required as the targets
have a proper libdl so with the function names one would expect.
To make this work I've had to remove the const qualifier from the
GetLibdlFunctionDeclarations function (as now the declarations can
depend on the connected target). Since I was already modifying the
prototype (and the lower levels were already converted to StringRef) I
took the oportunity to convert this function as well.
llvm-svn: 307160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The std::move was preventing copy ellision when compiled with
clang, the patch fixes the warning along with rearranging code
to remove unused variables warnings on Linux machines with
older perf_event interface.
Reviewers: labath, ted
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34946
llvm-svn: 307030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewers: zturner, eugene, krytarowski
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33831
llvm-svn: 307009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NSSetM has two in-memory representations depending on what Foundation version is in use.
This patch separates the two.
rdar://33057292
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34821
llvm-svn: 306773
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 306765
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 306686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The classes have no dependencies, and they are used both by lldb and
lldb-server, so it makes sense for them to live in the lowest layers.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34746
llvm-svn: 306682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The instruction pattern:
and $-16, %esp
sub $imm, %esp
...
lea imm(%ebp), %esp
appears when the compiler is realigning the stack (for example in
main(), or almost everywhere with -mstackrealign switch). The "and"
instruction is very difficult to model, but that's not necessary, as
these frames are always %ebp-based (the compiler also needs a way to
restore the original %esp). Therefore the plans we were generating for
these function were almost correct already. The only place we were doing
it wrong were the last instructions of the epilogue (usually just
"ret"), where we had to revert to %esp-based unwinding, as the %ebp had
been popped already.
This was wrong because our "distance of esp from cfa" counter had picked
up the "sub" instruction (and incremented the counter) but it had not
seen that the register was reset by the "lea" instruction.
This patch fixes that shortcoming, and adds a test for handling
functions like this.
I have not been able to tickle the compiler into producing a 64-bit
function with this pattern, but I don't see a reason why it couldn't
produce it, if it chose to, so I add a x86_64 test as well.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34750
llvm-svn: 306666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm not running the saved pc through FixCodeAddress as soon as I should.
<rdar://problem/30686307>
llvm-svn: 306634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
some methods in the ABI need a Process to do their work.
Instead of passing it in as a one-off argument to those
methods, this patch puts it in the base class and the methods
can retrieve if it needed.
Note that ABI's are sometimes built without a Process
(e.g. SBTarget::GetStackRedZoneSize) so it's entirely
possible that the process weak pointer will not be
able to reconsistitue into a strong pointer.
<rdar://problem/32526754>
llvm-svn: 306633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
instead of using a boolean to differentiate between the two section
types, use an enum to make the intent clearer.
I also remove the RegisterKind argument from the constructor, as this
can be deduced from the Type argument.
Reviewers: clayborg, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34681
llvm-svn: 306521
|