| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11902
llvm-svn: 244741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This commit moves the m_spawned_pids member from the common LLGS/Platform class to the plaform
specific part. This enables us to remove LLGS code, which was attempting to manage the
m_spawned_pids contents, but at the same time making sure, there is only one debugged process. If
we ever want to do multi-process debugging, we will probably want to replace this with a set of
NativeProcessProtocolSP anyway. The only functional change is that support for
qKillSpawnedProcess packet is removed from LLGS, but this was not used there anyway (we have the
k packet for that).
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11557
llvm-svn: 243513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Handle_k was printing an error when killing a process because KillSpawnedProcess was expecting to
be asynchronously notified of the process death, which no longer works, since we don't wait for
the process on a separate thread. However, the whole usage of KillSpawnedProcess is dubious here,
since it tries to be nice and terminate the process first with SIGTERM, which will not have the
intended effect on a ptraced process. I replace this code with a call to
NativeProcessProtocol::Kill, which does not suffer from these problems.
Reviewers: chaoren, ovyalov
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11520
llvm-svn: 243397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This adds support for jstopinfo field of stop-reply packets. This field enables us to avoid
querying full thread stop data on most stops (see r242593 for more details).
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11415
llvm-svn: 242997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This commit integrates MainLoop into NativeProcessLinux. By registering a SIGCHLD handler with
the llgs main loop, we can get rid of the special monitor thread in NPL, which saves as a lot of
thread ping-pong when responding to client requests (e.g. qThreadInfo processing time has been
reduced by about 40%). It also makes the code simpler, IMHO.
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg, tberghammer, chaoren
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11150
This is a resubmission of r242305 after it was reverted due to bad interactions with the stdio
thread.
llvm-svn: 242783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This commit removes the stdio forwarding thread in lldb-server in favor of a MainLoop callback.
As in some situations we need to forcibly flush the stream ( => Read() is called from multiple
places) and we still have multiple threads, I have had to additionally protect the communication
instance with a mutex.
Reviewers: ovyalov, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11296
llvm-svn: 242782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
It seems that reading of register data is the biggest bottleneck in LLGS at the moment. Sending
four registers instead of the full GPR set increases the jThreadsInfo processing time about
6-fold. Until we figure out where is this time going, this commit limits the amount of data we
send to provide a more fluid debugging experience.
Reviewers: tberghammer, ovyalov
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11264
llvm-svn: 242517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This commit adds initial support for the jThreadsInfo packet to lldb-server. The current
implementation does not expedite inferior memory. I have also added a description of the new
packet to our protocol documentation (mostly taken from Greg's earlier commit message).
Reviewers: clayborg, ovyalov, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11187
llvm-svn: 242402
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This seems to be causing major slowdows on the android buildbot. Reverting while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 242391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This commit integrates MainLoop into NativeProcessLinux. By registering a SIGCHLD handler with
the llgs main loop, we can get rid of the special monitor thread in NPL, which saves as a lot of
thread ping-pong when responding to client requests (e.g. qThreadInfo processing time has been
reduced by about 40%). It also makes the code simpler, IMHO.
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg, tberghammer, chaoren
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11150
llvm-svn: 242305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is the first part of our effort to make llgs single threaded. Currently, llgs consists of
about three threads and the synchronisation between them is a major source of latency when
debugging linux and android applications.
In order to be able to go single threaded, we must have the ability to listen for events from
multiple sources (primarily, client commands coming over the network and debug events from the
inferior) and perform necessary actions. For this reason I introduce the concept of a MainLoop.
A main loop has the ability to register callback's which will be invoked upon receipt of certain
events. MainLoopPosix has the ability to listen for file descriptors and signals.
For the moment, I have merely made the GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS class use MainLoop
instead of waiting on the network socket directly, but the other threads still remain. In the
followup patches I indend to migrate NativeProcessLinux to this class and remove the remaining
threads.
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg, amccarth, zturner, emaste
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11066
llvm-svn: 242018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This commit avoids the Platform instance when spawning or attaching to a process in lldb-server.
Instead, I have the server call a (static) method of NativeProcessProtocol directly. The reason
for this is that I believe that NativeProcessProtocol should be decoupled from the Platform
(after all, it always knows which platform it is running on, unlike the rest of lldb).
Additionally, the kind of platform actions a NativeProcessProtocol instance is likely to differ
greatly from the platform actions of the lldb client, so I think the separation makes sense.
After this, the only dependency NativeProcessLinux has on PlatformLinux is the ResolveExecutable
method, which needs additional refactoring.
This is a resubmit of r241672, after it was reverted due to build failueres on non-linux
platforms.
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10996
llvm-svn: 241796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
platform-specific symbols that are not implemented on OS X.
The build error that caused this is
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol::Attach(unsigned long long, lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol::NativeDelegate&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol>&)", referenced from:
lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS::AttachToProcess(unsigned long long) in liblldb-core.a(GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS.o)
"lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol::Launch(lldb_private::ProcessLaunchInfo&, lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol::NativeDelegate&, std::__1::shared_ptr<lldb_private::NativeProcessProtocol>&)", referenced from:
lldb_private::process_gdb_remote::GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS::LaunchProcess() in liblldb-core.a(GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS.o)
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
llvm-svn: 241688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This commit avoids the Platform instance when spawning or attaching to a process in lldb-server.
Instead, I have the server call a (static) method of NativeProcessProtocol directly. The reason
for this is that I believe that NativeProcessProtocol should be decoupled from the Platform
(after all, it always knows which platform it is running on, unlike the rest of lldb).
Additionally, the kind of platform actions a NativeProcessProtocol instance is likely to differ
greatly from the platform actions of the lldb client, so I think the separation makes sense.
After this, the only dependency NativeProcessLinux has on PlatformLinux is the ResolveExecutable
method, which needs additional refactoring.
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10996
llvm-svn: 241672
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10490
llvm-svn: 240052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This should solve the issue of sending denormalized paths over gdb-remote
if we stick to GetPath(false) in GDBRemoteCommunicationClient, and let the
server handle any denormalization.
Reviewers: ovyalov, zturner, vharron, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: tberghammer, emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9728
llvm-svn: 238604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change also get rid of an unused Debugger instance in
GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS and the command interpreter from
lldb-platform what was used only for enabling logging.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9876
llvm-svn: 238319
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 237425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
NativeProcessProtocol uses ReadMemory internally for setting/checking
breakpoints but also for generic memory reads (Handle_m), this change adds a
ReadMemoryWithoutTrap for that purpose. Also fixes a bunch of misuses of addr_t
as size/length.
Test Plan: `disassemble` no longer shows the trap code.
Reviewers: jingham, vharron, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9330
llvm-svn: 236132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Typically, LLGS only sends stdout/stderr notifications when the inferior
process is running.
Because LLGS reads stdout from the process in a separate thread, sometimes
these stdout notifications can be received after the server has sent a thread
stop message. The host isn't expecting stdout to be generated by the target
after a stop message and these messages interfere with the host's request/
response paradigm.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9024
llvm-svn: 234995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Affected paths:
* Plugins/Platform/Android/*
* Plugins/Platform/Linux/*
* Plugins/Platform/gdb-server/*
* Plugins/Process/Linux/*
* Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/*
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8654
llvm-svn: 233679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously the remote module sepcification was fetched only from the
remote platform. With this CL if we have a remote process then we ask it
if it have any information from a given module. It is required because
on android the dynamic linker only reports the name of the SO file and
the platform can't always find it without a full path (the process can
do it based on /proc/<pid>/maps).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8547
llvm-svn: 233061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some application on Linux an all application on android close stdout and
stderr during the libc exit stage. Previously the master file descriptor
of the pseudo terminal used to communicate with the inferior was closed
on an EOF causing a race condition and a possible SIGHUP on process
exit. After this change the master file descriptor will be closed by the
destructor of the GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS class.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8436
llvm-svn: 232724
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 232488
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 231169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No functional change here, only deletes unnecessary headers
and moves one function's body from the .h file to the .cpp.
llvm-svn: 231145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
until ThreadStateCoordinator is fully stopped before entering ~NativeProcessLinux.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7692
llvm-svn: 229875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Using GDB register numbers confuses ProcessGDBRemote since the rest of
LLGS (qRegisterInfo, p, P) uses the default register numbers instead.
Test Plan: dosep.py --options --arch x86 ...
Reviewers: ovyalov, vharron, sivachandra
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7635
llvm-svn: 229505
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 229503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixed test case to copy redirected stdout/stderr files from remote
target to host
llgs wasn't bothering to put the pty master file handle in the right
place if stdout/stderr were redirected to a file. It is still needed
for stdin.
Corrected some log message text
llvm-svn: 229141
|
|
GDBRemoteCommunicationServer: Basic packet handling, handler registration
LLDBCommonPacketHandler: Common packet handling for lldb-platform and lldb-gdbserver
LLDBPlatformPacketHandler: lldb-platform specific packet handling
LLGSPacketHandler: lldb-gdbserver specific packet handling
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7538
llvm-svn: 228823
|