| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so that we will use the UnwindPlan's rule for providing the stack
pointer BEFORE we use the trick of using the callee's CFA address
as the stack pointer. When we're in a _sigtramp frame, the CFA of
the _sigtramp stack frame is not the same as the stack pointer value
when the async interrupt occurred -- we need to use the eh_frame
rules for retrieving the correct value.
<rdar://problem/18913548>
llvm-svn: 225427
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
system plug-in, that is is used to fetch the register values.
llvm-svn: 224083
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
things go wrong. We also dump the dictionary or collection that had errors so the user can see which info was wrong.
llvm-svn: 224082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The issue with Thumb IT (if/then) instructions is the IT instruction preceeds up to four instructions that are made conditional. If a breakpoint is placed on one of the conditional instructions, the instruction either needs to match the thumb opcode size (2 or 4 bytes) or a BKPT instruction needs to be used as these are always unconditional (even in a IT instruction). If BKPT instructions are used, then we might end up stopping on an instruction that won't get executed. So if we do stop at a BKPT instruction, we need to continue if the condition is not true.
When using the BKPT isntructions are easy in that you don't need to detect the size of the breakpoint that needs to be used when setting a breakpoint even in a thumb IT instruction. The bad part is you will now always stop at the opcode location and let LLDB determine if it should auto-continue. If the BKPT instruction is used, the BKPT that is used for ARM code should be something that also triggers the BKPT instruction in Thumb in case you set a breakpoint in the middle of code and the code is actually Thumb code. A value of 0xE120BE70 will work since the lower 16 bits being 0xBE70 happens to be a Thumb BKPT instruction.
The alternative is to use trap or illegal instructions that the kernel will translate into breakpoint hits. On Mac this was 0xE7FFDEFE for ARM and 0xDEFE for Thumb. The darwin kernel currently doesn't recognize any 32 bit Thumb instruction as a instruction that will get turned into a breakpoint exception (EXC_BREAKPOINT), so we had to use the BKPT instruction on Mac. The linux kernel recognizes a 16 and a 32 bit instruction as valid thumb breakpoint opcodes. The benefit of using 16 or 32 bit instructions is you don't stop on opcodes in a IT block when the condition doesn't match.
To further complicate things, single stepping on ARM is often implemented by modifying the BCR/BVR registers and setting the processor to stop when the PC is not equal to the current value. This means single stepping is another way the ARM target can stop on instructions that won't get executed.
This patch does the following:
1 - Fix the internal debugserver for Apple to use the BKPT instruction for ARM and Thumb
2 - Fix LLDB to catch when we stop in the middle of a Thumb IT instruction and continue if we stop at an instruction that won't execute
3 - Fixes this in a way that will work for any target on any platform as long as it is ARM/Thumb
4 - Adds a patch for ignoring conditions that don't match when in ARM mode (see below)
This patch also provides the code that implements the same thing for ARM instructions, though it is disabled for now. The ARM patch will check the condition of the instruction in ARM mode and continue if the condition isn't true (and therefore the instruction would not be executed). Again, this is not enable, but the code for it has been added.
<rdar://problem/19145455>
llvm-svn: 223851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a register value that is live in the stack frame 0 register context.
Fixes a problem where retrieving a register value on stack frame #n
would involved O(n!) stack frame checks. This could be very slow on
a deep stack when retrieving register values that had not been
modified/saved by any of the stack frames. Not common, but annoying
when it was hit.
<rdar://problem/19010211>
llvm-svn: 223843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
section for x86_64 and i386 targets on Darwin systems. Currently only the
compact unwind encoding for normal frame-using functions is supported but it
will be easy handle frameless functions when I have a bit more free time to
test it. The LSDA and personality routines for functions are also retrieved
correctly for functions from the compact unwind section.
This new code is very fresh -- it passes the lldb testsuite and I've done
by-hand inspection of many functions and am getting correct behavior for all
of them. There may need to be some bug fixing over the next couple weeks as
I exercise and test it further. But I think it's fine right now so I'm
committing it.
<rdar://problem/13220837>
llvm-svn: 223625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
UnwindLLDB::AddOneMoreFrame to try the fallback unwind plan on
that same stack frame before it tries the fallback unwind plan
on the "next" or callee frame.
In RegisterContextLLDB::TryFallbackUnwindPlan, when we're
trying the fallback unwind plan to see if it is valid, make
sure we change all of the object ivars that might be used in
the process of fetching the CFA & caller's saved pc value
and restore those if we decide not to use the fallback
unwindplan.
<rdar://problem/19035079>
llvm-svn: 222601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LLDB supports many different register numbering schemes, and these
are typically prefixed with an indicator that lets the user know
what numbering scheme is used. The gcc numbering scheme is
prefixed with gcc, and there are similar ones for dwarf, gdb,
and gcc_dwarf.
LLDB also contains its own internal numbering scheme, but the enum
for LLDB's numbering scheme was prefixed differently. This patch
changes the names of these enums to use the same naming scheme for
the enum values as the rest of the register kinds by removing gpr_
and fpu_ prefixes, and instead using lldb_ prefixes for all enum
values.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6351
Reviewed by: Greg Clayton
llvm-svn: 222495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Running a diff against lldb-x86-register-enums.h and the file
modified in this patch, the two enums were completely identical.
Deleting one of them to reduce code noise.
llvm-svn: 222478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
where it is retrieving the Return Address register contents
on a target where that's a thing. If we fail to get a valid
RA, we force a switch to the fallback unwind plan. This patch
adds a sanity check for that fallback unwind plan -- it must
get a valid CFA for this frame in addition to being able to
retrieve the caller's PC -- and it correctly marks the unwind
rules as failing if the fallback unwind plan fails.
<rdar://problem/19010211>
llvm-svn: 222301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RegisterContextLLDB. I have core files of half a dozen tricky
unwind situations on x86/arm and they're all working pretty much
correctly at this point, but we'll need to keep an eye out for
unwinder regressions for a little while; it's tricky to get these
heuristics completely correct in all unwind situations.
<rdar://problem/18937193>
llvm-svn: 221866
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with addresses that aren't designed to be column-aligned across multiple lines.
llvm-svn: 221810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After r221575 TestCallStopAndContinue and TestCallThatRestarts started
crashing on FreeBSD with a null temporary_module_sp in
RegisterContextLLDB::InitializeNonZerothFrame().
llvm-svn: 221805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The addition of RegisterNumber introduced a bug where if the PC is stored in a
return address register, such as on ARM and PowerPC, this register number is
retrieved and used, but never checked in the row if it's saved. Correct this by
setting the variable that's used to the new register number.
Patch by Jason Molenda.
llvm-svn: 221790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Taking advantage of the new 'CFAIsRegisterDereferenced' CFA register type, add
full stack unwind support to the PowerPC/PowerPC64 ABI. Also, add a new
register set for powerpc32-on-64, so the register sizes are correct. This also
requires modifying the ProcessMonitor to add support for non-uintptr_t-sized
register values.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, emaste
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6183
llvm-svn: 221789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
PowerPC handles the stack chain with the current stack pointer being a pointer
to the backchain (CFA). LLDB currently has no way of handling this, so this
adds a "CFA is dereferenced from a register" type.
Discussed with Jason Molenda, who also provided the initial patch for this.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6182
llvm-svn: 221788
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RegisterContextLLDB a bit more in a few places.
llvm-svn: 221677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
it in RegisterContext.cpp.
There's a lot of bookkeeping code in RegisterContextLLDB where it has
to convert between different register numbering schemes and it makes
some methods like SavedLocationForRegister very hard to read or
maintain. Abstract all of the details about different register numbering
systems for a given register into this new class to make it easier
to understand what the method is doing.
Also add register name printing to all of the logging -- that's easy to
get now that I've got an object to represent the register numbers.
There were some gnarly corner cases of this method that I believe
I've translated correctly - initial testing looks good but it's
possible I missed a corner case, especially with architectures which
uses a link-register aka return address register like arm32/arm64.
Basic behavior is correct but there are a lot of corner casese that are
handled in this method ...
llvm-svn: 221577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a noreturn function was the last function in a section,
we wouldn't correctly back up the saved-pc value into the
correct section leading to us showing the wrong function in
the backtrace.
Also add a backtrace test with an attempt to elicit this
particular layout. It happens to work out with clang -Os
but other compilers may not quite get the same layout I'm
getting at that opt setting. We'll still be exercising the
basic noreturn handling in the unwinder even if we don't get
one function at the very end of a section.
<rdar://problem/16051613>
llvm-svn: 221575
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 221570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so it doesn't try the arch default if a comiler-generated (eh_frame,
compact unwind info) based unwind plan has failed.
llvm-svn: 221239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
let's let lldb try the arch default unwind every time but not destructively --
it doesn't permanently replace the main unwind method for that function from
now on.
This fix is for <rdar://problem/18683658>.
I tested it against Ryan Brown's go program test case and also a
collection of core files of tricky unwind scenarios
<rdar://problem/15664282> <rdar://problem/15835846>
<rdar://problem/15982682> <rdar://problem/16099440>
<rdar://problem/17364005> <rdar://problem/18556719>
that I've fixed over the last 6-9 months.
llvm-svn: 221238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
is "invalid" -- it is past the end of the stack trace. Add a new
method IsCompletedStackWalk() so we can tell if an invalid stack
frame is from a complete backtrace or if it might be worth re-trying
the last unwind with a different method.
This fixes the unwinder problems Ryan Brown was having with go
programs. The unwinder can (under the right circumstances) still
destructively replace unwind plans permanently - I'll work on
that in a different patch.
<rdar://problem/18683658>
llvm-svn: 221229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
SIGPROF is used for profiling processes (with google-perftools for
instance), which results in the inferior receiving a SIGPROF from the
kernel every few milliseconds. Instead of stopping the debugging session
and notifying the user of this, we should just pass the signal and keep
running.
This follows the behavior we have in UnixSignals.cpp.
Test Plan: Run LLDB on linux with a binary using google-perftools, see that execution gets interrupted all the time because we receive SIGPROF. Apply the patch, everything works fine.
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5953
llvm-svn: 221011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This adds preliminary support for PowerPC/PowerPC64, for FreeBSD. There are
some issues still:
* Breakpoints don't work well on powerpc64.
* Shared libraries don't yet get loaded for a 32-bit process on powerpc64 host.
* Backtraces don't work. This is due to PowerPC ABI using a backchain pointer
in memory, instead of a dedicated frame pointer register for the backchain.
* Breakpoints on functions without debug info may not work correctly for 32-bit
powerpc.
Reviewers: emaste, tfiala, jingham, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5988
llvm-svn: 220944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
function because of a '1u' making it a 32-bit value
when it really needed to be a 64-bit value. Trivial to fix
once I figured out what was going on.
clang static analzyer fixit.
llvm-svn: 220022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in GetFullUnwindPlanForFrame() - the code was mostly checking
that we had an active Process and ABI but not always.
clang static analyzer fixit.
llvm-svn: 219772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the backtrace, try falling back to the architecture default
unwind plan and see if we can backtrace a little further.
<rdar://problem/18556719>
llvm-svn: 219247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
more accessible from
the user level. It adds the ability to invent new stepping modes implemented by python classes,
and to view the current thread plan stack and to some extent alter it.
I haven't gotten to documentation or tests yet. But this should not cause any behavior changes
if you don't use it, so its safe to check it in now and work on it incrementally.
llvm-svn: 218642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lldb/llvm/clang/compiler-rt repos.
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D5495 for more details.
These are changes that are part of an effort to support building llgs, within the AOSP source tree, using the Android.mk
build system, when using the llvm/clang/lldb git repos from AOSP replaced with the experimental ones currently in
github.com/tfiala/aosp-{llvm,clang,lldb,compiler-rt}.
llvm-svn: 218568
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 217419
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D4596
llvm-svn: 217116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
detct unwind loops but there was a code path through there (using
architecture default unwind plans) that didn't do the check, and
could end up with an infinite loop unwind. Move that code into a
separate method and call it from both places where it is needed.
Also remove the use of ABI::FunctionCallsChangeCFA in that check.
I thought about it a lot and none of the architecutres that we're
supporting today can have a looping CFA.
Since the unwinder isn't using ABI::FunctionCallsChangeCFA() and
ABI::StackUsesFrames(), and the unwinder was the only reason
those methods exists, I removed them from the ABI and all its
plugins.
<rdar://problem/17364005>
llvm-svn: 216992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D5089 for more details.
Change by Paul Osmialowski.
llvm-svn: 216907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Yet another step toward ARM64 support. With this commit, lldb-gdbserver started on ARM64 target can be accessed by lldb running on desktop PC and it can process simple commands (like 'continue'). Still ARM64 support lacks NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm64.* code which waits to be implemented.
Based on similar files for Linux x86_64 and Darwin ARM64. Due to common code extraction from Darwin related files, lldb should be tested for any unexpected regression on Darwin ARM64 machines too.
See the following for more details:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4580
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/lldb-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140825/012670.html
Change by Paul Osmialowski.
llvm-svn: 216737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D5069.
Change by Paul Osmialowski.
llvm-svn: 216554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We decided to use assmbly profiler instead of eh_frame for frame 0 because for compiler generated code, eh_frame is usually synchronous(a.k.a. only valid at call site); and we have no way to tell if it's asynchronous or not.
But for x86 & x86_64 compiler generated code:
1. clang & GCC describes all prologue instructions in eh_frame;
2. mid-function stack pointer altering instructions can be easily detected.
So we can grab eh_frame, and use assembly profiler to augment it into asynchronous unwind table.
This change also benefits hand-written assembly; eh_frame for hand-written assembly is often asynchronous,so we have a much better chance to successfully unwind through them.
Change by Tong Shen.
llvm-svn: 216406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
i386 eh_frame register numbering, encoding a darwin-specific
bug in the register numbering. Update the definitions to be
the correct values, Darwin can use the register numbers from
debugserver. Patch from Tong Shen.
llvm-svn: 215488
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix by Tong Shen.
llvm-svn: 215424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See the following llvm change for details:
r213743 | tnorthover | 2014-07-23 05:32:47 -0700 (Wed, 23 Jul 2014) | 9 lines
AArch64: remove arm64 triple enumerator.
This change fixes build breaks on Linux and MacOSX lldb.
llvm-svn: 213755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to be able to piece together a value that is spread across multiple registers.
Patch from Adrian Prantl.
<rdar://problem/16040521>
llvm-svn: 212867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change by Paul Osmialowski
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D4379 for details.
llvm-svn: 212583
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 212553
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 212172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
changes included are -
- Ported the SWIG wrapper shell scripts to Python so that they would work on Windows too along with other platforms
- Updated CMake handling to fix SWIG errors and manage sym-linking on Windows to liblldb.dll
- More build fixes for Windows
The pending issues are that two Python modules, termios and pexpect are not available on Windows.
These are currently required for the Python command interpreter to be used from within LLDB.
llvm-svn: 212111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also moves NativeRegisterContextLinux* files into the Linux directory.
These, like NativeProcessLinux, should only be built on Linux or a cross
compiler with proper headers.
llvm-svn: 212074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change brings in lldb-gdbserver (llgs) specifically for Linux x86_64.
(More architectures coming soon).
Not every debugserver option is covered yet. Currently
the lldb-gdbserver command line can start unattached,
start attached to a pid (process-name attach not supported yet),
or accept lldb attaching and launching a process or connecting
by process id.
The history of this large change can be found here:
https://github.com/tfiala/lldb/tree/dev-tfiala-native-protocol-linux-x86_64
Until mid/late April, I was not sharing the work and continued
to rebase it off of head (developed via id tfiala@google.com). I switched over to
user todd.fiala@gmail.com in the middle, and once I went to github, I did
merges rather than rebasing so I could share with others.
llvm-svn: 212069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace adhoc inline implementation of llvm::array_lengthof in favour of the
implementation in LLVM. This is simply a cleanup change, no functional change
intended.
llvm-svn: 211868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
mistake in the lock acquistion in HistoryUnwind and HistoryThread.
We've got a deadlock with one use case of HistoryUnwind; I
need to figure out what lock ordering is causing this and fix
it for real.
<rdar://problem/17411904>
llvm-svn: 211541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
to modify the same UnwindTable object simultaneously. Fix
HistoryThread and HistoryUnwind's mutex lock acqusition to
retain the lock for the duration of the operation instead of
releasing the temporary immediately.
<rdar://problem/17055023>
llvm-svn: 211241
|