summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lldb/source/Expression/UtilityFunction.cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Move classes from Core -> Utility.Zachary Turner2017-02-021-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility. ConstString Error RegularExpression Stream StreamString The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies. These are all low level and very widely used classes, and previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes sense from both the short term and long term perspective in solving this problem. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427 llvm-svn: 293941
* [lldb] Fix typos in file headersAlexander Shaposhnikov2016-11-261-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This diff fixes typos in file headers (incorrect file names). Test plan: Under llvm/tools/lldb/source: find ./* -type f | grep -e '\(cpp\|h\)$' | while read F; do B=$(basename $F); echo $F head -n 1 $F | grep -v $B | wc -l ; done Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27115 llvm-svn: 287966
* *** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source codeKate Stone2016-09-061-74/+64
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
* UtilityFunction::MakeFunctionCaller uses the Error to report failure,Jim Ingham2016-04-261-0/+3
| | | | | | | | but when there's was no process it was just returning an null pointer and not setting the error. I don't have a scenario where this might go wrong, just code inspection... llvm-svn: 267594
* Compilation can end up calling functions (e.g. to resolve indirect ↵Jim Ingham2016-03-211-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | functions) so I added a way for compilation to take a "thread to use for compilation". If it isn't set then the compilation will use the currently selected thread. This should help keep function execution to the one thread intended. llvm-svn: 263972
* Add a DiagnosticManager replace error streams in the expression parser.Sean Callanan2016-03-191-15/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave all of them. To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors to the user. This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead pass the Severity flag. The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase. <rdar://problem/22864976> llvm-svn: 263859
* Reduce header inclusion in Expression.Bruce Mitchener2015-10-071-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Reviewers: spyffe Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13333 llvm-svn: 249570
* This patch makes Clang-independent base classes for all the expression types ↵Jim Ingham2015-09-151-0/+123
that lldb currently vends. Before we had: ClangFunction ClangUtilityFunction ClangUserExpression and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds: FunctionCaller UtilityFunction UserExpression You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage. The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it. Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way, I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types. Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs. The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions. Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary. llvm-svn: 247720
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud