summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/expression_command
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Remove assumptions that thread 0 is always the main thread.Zachary Turner2016-01-211-6/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Starting with Windows 10, the Windows loader is itself multi-threaded, meaning that the loader spins up a few threads to do process initialization before it executes main. Windows delivers these notifications asynchronously and they can come out of order, so we can't be sure that the first thread we get a notification about is actually the zero'th thread. This patch fixes this by requesting the thread stopped at the breakpoint that was specified, rather than getting thread 0 and verifying that it is stopped at a breakpoint. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16247 llvm-svn: 258432
* XFAIL some tests failing for Windows -> AndroidTamas Berghammer2015-12-171-0/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 255885
* Read macro info from .debug_macro section and use it for expression evaluation.Siva Chandra2015-12-165-0/+153
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: DWARF 5 proposes a reinvented .debug_macro section. This change follows that spec. Currently, only GCC produces the .debug_macro section and hence the added test is annottated with expectedFailureClang. Reviewers: spyffe, clayborg, tberghammer Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15437 llvm-svn: 255729
* Recommit "Fix race during process interruption"Pavel Labath2015-12-071-2/+2
| | | | | | | | This is a resubmit of r254403, see that commit's message for context. This fixes an issue in the original commit, where we would incorrectly interrupt the process if the interrupt request came just as we were about to send the stopped event to the public. llvm-svn: 254902
* Revert "Fix race during process interruption"Pavel Labath2015-12-011-2/+2
| | | | | | The android buildbot gets quite flaky after this change. I'm reverting it while I investigate. llvm-svn: 254430
* Fix race during process interruptionPavel Labath2015-12-011-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: The following situation was occuring in TestAttachResume: - we did a "continue" from a breakpoint (which involves a private start-stop to step over the breakpoint) - after receiving the stop-reply from the step-over, we issue a "detach" (which requires a process interrupt) - at this moment, the public state is "running", private state is "about-to-be-stopped" (the stopped event was broadcast, but it was not received yet) - StopForDestroyOrDetach (public thread) notes the public state is running, sends an interrupt request to the private thread - private thread gets the eBroadcastBitInterrupt (before the eStateStopped message), and asks the process plugin to stop (via Halt()) - process plugin says it has nothing to do as the process is already stopped - private thread shrugs and carries on. receives the stop event, restores the breakpoint and resumes the process. - after a while, the public thread times out and says it failed to stop the process This patch does the following: - splits Halt() into two functions, private and public, their usage depends on the context - public Halt(): sends eBroadcastBitInterrupt to the private thread and waits for the Stop event - HaltPrivate(): asks the plugin to stop and makes a note that the halt was requested. When the next stop event comes it sets the interrupt flag on it. - removes HijackPrivateProcessEvents(), as the only user (old Halt()) has gone away - removes the m_currently_handling_event hack, as the new Halt() does not need it - adds a use_run_lock parameter to public Halt() and WaitForProcessToStop(). This was needed because RunThreadPlan uses Halt() while holding the run lock and we don't want Halt() to take it away from him. Reviewers: clayborg, jingham Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14989 llvm-svn: 254403
* Fix to solve Bug 23139 & Bug 23560Abhishek Aggarwal2015-11-131-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: - Reason of both bugs: 1. For the very first frame, Unwinder doesn't check the validity of Full UnwindPlan before creating StackFrame from it: When 'process launch' command is run after setting a breakpoint in inferior, the Unwinder runs and saves only Frame 0 (the frame in which breakpoint was set) in thread's StackFrameList i.e. m_curr_frames_sp. However, it doesn't check the validity of the Full UnwindPlan for this frame by unwinding 2 more frames further. 2. Unwinder doesn't update the CFA value of Cursor when Full UnwindPlan fails and FallBack UnwindPlan succeeds in providing valid CFA values for frames: Sometimes during unwinding of stack frames, the Full UnwindPlan inside the RegisterContextLLDB object may fail to provide valid CFA values for these frames. Then the Fallback UnwindPlan is used to unwind the frames. If the Fallback UnwindPlan succeeds, then it provides a valid new CFA value. The RegisterContextLLDB::m_cfa field of Cursor object is updated during the Fallback UnwindPlan execution. However, UnwindLLDB misses the implementation to update the 'cfa' field of this Cursor with this valid new CFA value. - This patch fixes both these issues. - Remove XFAIL in test files corresponding to these 2 Bugs Change-Id: I932ea407545ceee2d628f946ecc61a4806d4cc86 Signed-off-by: Abhishek Aggarwal <abhishek.a.aggarwal@intel.com> Reviewers: jingham, lldb-commits, jasonmolenda Subscribers: lldb-commits, ovyalov, tberghammer Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14226 llvm-svn: 253026
* [test] Fix comment.Dawn Perchik2015-11-121-1/+1
| | | | llvm-svn: 252831
* Remove `use_lldb_suite` from the package, and don't import it anymore.Zachary Turner2015-11-0323-23/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it, because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this patch is essentially no functional change. To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the `use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the original copy still remains in `lldb/test` llvm-svn: 251963
* Tighten up sys.path, and use absolute imports everywhere.Zachary Turner2015-11-0323-43/+43
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For convenience, we had added the folder that dotest.py was in to sys.path, so that we could easily write things like `import lldbutil` from anywhere and any test. This introduces a subtle problem when using Python's package system, because when unittest2 imports a particular test suite, the test suite is detached from the package. Thus, writing "import lldbutil" from dotest imports it as part of the package, and writing the same line from a test does a fresh import since the importing module was not part of the same package. The real way to fix this is to use absolute imports everywhere. Instead of writing "import lldbutil", we need to write "import lldbsuite.test.util". This patch fixes up that and all other similar cases, and additionally removes the script directory from sys.path to ensure that this can't happen again. llvm-svn: 251886
* Move lldb/test to lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test.Zachary Turner2015-10-2867-0/+2579
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with `test`). llvm-svn: 251532
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud