| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have several tests that TIMEOUT under heavy load but just need a bit
more time to complete.
llvm-svn: 252703
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit closes the following review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D14488
llvm-svn: 252498
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We still see "Too many file handles" errors on Windows even with
lower numbers of cores. It's not clear what the right balance is,
and the bar seems to move as more tests get added. So just use
the strategy that works until we can investigate more deeply.
llvm-svn: 252325
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Absolute imports were introduced in Python 2.5 as a feature
(e.g. from __future__ import absolute_import), and made default
in Python 3.
When absolute imports are enabled, the import system changes in
a couple of ways:
1) The `import foo` syntax will *only* search sys.path. If `foo`
isn't in sys.path, it won't be found. Period. Without absolute
imports, the import system will also search the same directory
that the importing file resides in, so that you can easily
import from the same folder.
2) From inside a package, you can use a dot syntax to refer to higher
levels of the current package. For example, if you are in the
package lldbsuite.test.utility, then ..foo refers to
lldbsuite.test.foo. You can use this notation with the
`from X import Y` syntax to write intra-package references. For
example, using the previous locationa s a starting point, writing
`from ..support import seven` would import lldbsuite.support.seven
Since this is now the default behavior in Python 3, this means that
importing from the same directory with `import foo` *no longer works*.
As a result, the only way to have portable code is to force absolute
imports for all versions of Python.
See PEP 0328 [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0328/] for more
information about absolute and relative imports.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14342
Reviewed By: Todd Fiala
llvm-svn: 252191
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251982
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level
scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party
libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it,
because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level
script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just
adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this
patch is essentially no functional change.
To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the
`use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the
original copy still remains in `lldb/test`
llvm-svn: 251963
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 251830
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
packages/Python/lldbsuite is now a Python package, and it relies
on its __init__.py being called to do package-level initialization.
If you exec packages/Python/lldbsuite/dotest.py directly, you won't
get this package level initialization, and things will fail. But
without this patch, this is exactly what dosep itself does. To
launch the multi-processing fork, it was hardcoding a path to
dotest.py and exec'ing it from inside the package.
The fix here is to get the path of the top-level script, and
then exec'ing that instead. A more robust solution would involve
refactoring the code so that dosep execs some internal script that
imports lldbsuite, but that's a bit more involved.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14157
Reviewed by: Todd Fiala
llvm-svn: 251819
|
|
|
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
|
