| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I think it is clear by now that the new linker is viable.
llvm-svn: 262158
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 257801
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add PT_PHDR segment depending on its availability in linker script's
PHDRS command, fallback if no linker script is given.
Handle FILEHDR, PHDRS and FLAGS attributes of program header.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11589
llvm-svn: 244743
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Put sections to segments according to linker scripts if available.
Rework the code of TargetLayout::assignSectionsToSegments so it operates
on the given list of segments, which can be either read from linker scripts
or constructed as before.
Handle NONE segments defined in linker scripts by putting corresponding sections
to PT_NULL segment.
Consider flags set for segments through linker scripts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10918
llvm-svn: 243002
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When using a linker script expression to change the address of a section, even
if the new address is more than a page of distance from the old address, lld
may put everything in the same segment, forcing it to be unnecessarily large.
This patch changes the logic in Segment::assignVirtualAddress() and
Segment::assignFileOffsets() to allow the segment to be sliced into two or more
if it detects a linker script expression that changes a section address.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10952
llvm-svn: 242096
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When calculating the start address and size of a segment, lld mistakenly
attributed the start address of the last segment slice to the whole segment
when it should consider the start address of the first slice. In this case, in a
multi-slice segment, Segment::assignVirtualAddress() will return a wrong
segment start address to TargetLayout::assignVirtualAddress(). The effect of
this miscalculation is to allocate some program headers in unnecessarily far
away addresses. This commit fixes this.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10951
llvm-svn: 242089
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes the wrong .tbss segment size generated for cases where
multiple modules have non initialized threads variables. For instance:
* t0.c
__thread int x0;
__thread int x1;
__thread int x2;
extern __thread int e0;
extern __thread int e1;
extern __thread int e2;
extern __thread int e3;
int foo0 ()
{
return x0;
}
int main ()
{
return x0;
}
* t1.c
__thread int e0;
__thread int e1;
__thread int e2;
__thread int e3;
lld is generating (for aarch64):
[14] .tbss NOBITS 0000000000401000 00001000
0000000000000010 0000000000000000 WAT 0 0 4
Where is just taking in consideration the largest tbss segment, not all
from all objects. ld generates a correct output:
[17] .tbss NOBITS 0000000000410dec 00000dec
000000000000001c 0000000000000000 WAT 0 0 4
This issue is at 'lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/SegmentChunks.cpp' where
Segment<ELFT>::assignVirtualAddress is setting wrong slice values, not taking care
of although tbss segments file size does noy play role in other segment virtual
address placement, its size should still be considered.
llvm-svn: 239906
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 234981
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a retry of r234944.
llvm-svn: 234955
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 234954
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 234953
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r234944 because it seems to have broken the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 234946
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This function is too long and complicated. Looks like new code was
added incrementaly without any refactoring. Maybe no one can describe
its exact semantics any more? It even contains copy-pastes inside it.
This patch is an (incomplete) attempt to simplify the function.
I tried to mechanically translate code to another form more intelligible.
I don't still understand the whole picture, but this patch shouldn't
change the linker's functionality.
llvm-svn: 234944
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 234934
|
