| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 271435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
// Do test.
#else
// Empty test.
#endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.
Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730
llvm-svn: 271108
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
negate/bit_not.pass/logical_not) were defined as deriving from unary_funtion. That restriction was removed in C++11, but the tests still check for this. Change the test to look for the embedded types first_argument/second_argument/result_type. No change to the library, just more standards-compliant tests. Thanks to STL @ Microsoft for the suggestion.
llvm-svn: 225402
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
add/equal_to/logical_or) were defined as deriving from binary_funtion. That restriction was removed in C++11, but the tests still check for this. Change the test to look for the embedded types first_argument/second_argument/result_type. No change to the library, just more standards-compliant tests. Thanks to STL @ Microsoft for the suggestion.
llvm-svn: 225375
|
|
llvm-svn: 224658
|