| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch improves how libc++ handles min/max macros within the headers. Previously libc++ would undef them and emit a warning.
This patch changes libc++ to use `#pragma push_macro` to save the macro before undefining it, and `#pragma pop_macro` to restore the macros and the end of the header.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33080
llvm-svn: 304357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is my opinion that libc++ should never use `<cassert>`, including in the `dylib`.
This patch remove all uses of `assert` from within libc++ and replaces most of them with `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` instead.
Additionally this patch turn `LIBCXX_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS` off by default,
because the standard library should not be aborting user programs unless explicitly asked to.
llvm-svn: 294107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r292883. Unfortunately <string_view> uses
_LIBCPP_ASSERT in a way which is not compatible with the C++11 dylib
build. I'll investigate more tomorrow.
llvm-svn: 292923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
It is my opinion that libc++ should never use `<cassert>`, including in the `dylib`. This patch remove all uses of `assert` from within libc++ and replaces most of them with `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` instead.
Additionally this patch turn `LIBCXX_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS` off by default, because the standard library should not be aborting user programs unless explicitly asked to.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, compnerd, smeenai
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29063
llvm-svn: 292883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
context.
Summary:
This patch allows threads not created using `std::thread` to use `std::notify_all_at_thread_exit` by ensuring the TL state has been initialized within `std::notify_all_at_thread_exit`.
Additionally this patch "fixes" a potential oddity in `__thread_local_pointer::reset(pointer)`, which would previously delete the old thread local data. However there should *never* be old thread local data because pthread *should* null it out on thread exit. Unfortunately it's possible that pthread failed to do this according to the spec:
>
> Upon key creation, the value NULL shall be associated with the new key in all active threads. Upon thread creation, the value NULL shall be associated with all defined keys in the new thread.
>
> An optional destructor function may be associated with each key value. At thread exit, if a key value has a non-NULL destructor pointer, and the thread has a non-NULL value associated with that key, the value of the key is set to NULL, and then the function pointed to is called with the previously associated value as its sole argument. The order of destructor calls is unspecified if more than one destructor exists for a thread when it exits.
>
> If, after all the destructors have been called for all non-NULL values with associated destructors, there are still some non-NULL values with associated destructors, then the process is repeated. If, after at least {PTHREAD_DESTRUCTOR_ITERATIONS} iterations of destructor calls for outstanding non-NULL values, there are still some non-NULL values with associated destructors, implementations may stop calling destructors, or they may continue calling destructors until no non-NULL values with associated destructors exist, even though this might result in an infinite loop.
However if pthread fails to delete the value it is probably incorrect for us to do it. Destroying the value performs all of the "at thread exit" actions registered with it but we are way past "at thread exit".
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24159
llvm-svn: 280588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch extracts out all the pthread dependencies of libcxx into the
new header __threading_support. The motivation is to make it easy to
re-target libcxx into platforms that do not support pthread.
Original patch from Fulvio Esposito (fulvio.esposito@outlook.com) - D11781
Applied with tweaks - D19412
Change-Id: I301111f0075de93dd8129416e06babc195aa936b
llvm-svn: 268734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If you're crazy enough to want this sort of thing, then add
-D_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS to your CXXFLAGS and
--param=additiona_features=libcpp-has-no-threads to your lit commnad line.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3969
llvm-svn: 217271
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
condition_variable::wait, call terminate() rather than throwing an error. Do this indirectly, by marking the call as 'noexcept'. This is better than just calling terminate() directly, because it gives a better error message on the console.
llvm-svn: 204778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
functions to protect against duration and time_point overflow. Since
we're about to wait anyway, we can afford to spend a few more cycles on
this checking. I purposefully did not treat the timed try_locks with
overflow checking. This fixes
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13721 . I'm unsure if the standard
needs clarification in this area, or if this is simply QOI. The
<chrono> facilities were never intended to overflow check, but just to
not overflow if durations stayed within +/- 292 years.
llvm-svn: 162925
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 160605
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 145624
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 119395
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 116500
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
header <future> and all of Chapter 30 (for C++0x enabled compilers).
llvm-svn: 113017
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 103516
|
|
llvm-svn: 103490
|