| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 324081
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An unscoped enumeration used as template argument, should not have any
qualified information about its enclosing scope, as its visibility is
global.
In the case of scoped enumerations, they must include information
about their enclosing scope.
Patch by Carlos Alberto Enciso!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39239
llvm-svn: 321312
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
anonymous namespaces.
Patch by Sterling Augustine!
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14459
llvm-svn: 252488
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.
This command was used:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,misc-use-override' -header-filter='llvm|clang' -j=32 -fix
Reviewers: dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8926
llvm-svn: 234678
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After post-commit review and community discussion, this seems like a
reasonable direction to continue, making ownership semantics explicit in
the source using the type system.
llvm-svn: 215323
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r213307.
Reverting to have some on-list discussion/confirmation about the ongoing
direction of smart pointer usage in the LLVM project.
llvm-svn: 213325
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(after fixing a bug in MultiplexConsumer I noticed the ownership of the
nested consumers was implemented with raw pointers - so this fixes
that... and follows the source back to its origin pushing unique_ptr
ownership up through there too)
llvm-svn: 213307
|
|
|
qualified name of a NamedDecl. Patch by Volodymyr Sapsai!
llvm-svn: 209924
|