| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The following class hierarchy requires that we be able to emit a
this-adjusting thunk for B::foo in C's vftable:
struct Incomplete;
struct A {
virtual A* foo(Incomplete p) = 0;
};
struct B : virtual A {
void foo(Incomplete p) override;
};
struct C : B { int c; };
This TU is valid, but lacks a definition of 'Incomplete', which makes it
hard to build a thunk for the final overrider, B::foo.
Before this change, Clang gives up attempting to emit the thunk, because
it assumes that if the parameter types are incomplete, it must be
emitting the thunk for optimization purposes. This is untrue for the MS
ABI, where the implementation of B::foo has no idea what thunks C's
vftable may require. Clang needs to emit the thunk without necessarily
having access to the complete prototype of foo.
This change makes Clang emit a musttail variadic call when it needs such
a thunk. I call these "unprototyped" thunks, because they only prototype
the "this" parameter, which must always come first in the MS C++ ABI.
These thunks work, but they create ugly LLVM IR. If the call to the
thunk is devirtualized, it will be a call to a bitcast of a function
pointer. Today, LLVM cannot inline through such a call, but I want to
address that soon, because we also use this pattern for virtual member
pointer thunks.
This change also implements an old FIXME in the code about reusing the
thunk's computed CGFunctionInfo as much as possible. Now we don't end up
computing the thunk's mangled name and arranging it's prototype up to
around three times.
Fixes PR25641
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, hans
Subscribers: Prazek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45112
llvm-svn: 329009
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 519b97132a4c960e8dedbfe4290d86970d92e995
Author: Richard Trieu <rtrieu@google.com>
Date: Sat Mar 24 00:52:44 2018 +0000
[ODRHash] Support pointer and reference types.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@328404 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As it's breaking some tests. I've communicated with Richard offline about testcases.
llvm-svn: 329001
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CUDA shared variable should be initialized with undef.
Patch by Greg Rodgers.
Revised and lit test added by Yaxun Liu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44985
llvm-svn: 328994
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A recent addition to Coroutines TS (https://wg21.link/p0913) adds a pre-defined
coroutine noop_coroutine that does nothing. To implement this feature, we implemented
an llvm.coro.noop intrinsic that returns a coroutine handle to a coroutine that
does nothing when resumed or destroyed.
This patch adds a builtin __builtin_coro_noop() that maps to llvm.coro.noop intrinsic.
Related llvm change: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45114
llvm-svn: 328993
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL325291 implemented Coroutines TS N4723
section [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/7, but it performed lookup of allocator
functions within both the global and class scope, whereas the specified
behavior is to perform lookup for custom allocators within just the
class scope.
To fix, add parameters to the `Sema::FindAllocationFunctions` function
such that it can be used to lookup allocators in global scope,
class scope, or both (instead of just being able to look up in just global
scope or in both global and class scope). Then, use those parameters
from within the coroutine Sema.
This incorrect behavior had the unfortunate side-effect of causing the
bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36578 (or at least the reports
of that bug in C++ programs). That bug would occur for any C++ user with
a coroutine frame that took a single pointer argument, since it would
then find the global placement form `operator new`, described in the
C++ standard 18.6.1.3.1. This patch prevents Clang from generating code
that triggers the LLVM assert described in that bug report.
Test Plan: `check-clang`
Reviewers: GorNishanov, eric_niebler, lewissbaker
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44552
llvm-svn: 328949
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The problem with the previous logic was that there might not be any
explicit copy/move constructor declarations, e.g. if the type is
trivial and we've never type-checked a copy of it. Relying on Sema's
computation seems much more reliable.
Also, I believe Richard's recommendation is exactly the rule we use
now on the Itanium ABI, modulo the trivial_abi attribute (which this
change of course fixes our handling of in Swift).
This does mean that we have a less portable rule for deciding
indirectness for swiftcall. I would prefer it if we just applied the
Itanium rule universally under swiftcall, but in the meantime, I need
to fix this bug.
This only arises when defining functions with class-type arguments
in C++, as we do in the Swift runtime. It doesn't affect normal Swift
operation because we don't import code as C++.
llvm-svn: 328942
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The original implementation in the `LoopUnrolling.cpp` didn't consider the case where the counter is unsigned. This case is only handled in `simpleCondition()`, but this is not enough, we also need to deal with the unsinged counter with the counter initialization.
Since `IntegerLiteral` is `signed`, there is a `ImplicitCastExpr<IntegralCast>` in `unsigned counter = IntergerLiteral`. This patch add the `ignoringParenImpCasts()` in the `IntegerLiteral` matcher.
Reviewers: szepet, a.sidorin, NoQ, george.karpenkov
Reviewed By: szepet, george.karpenkov
Subscribers: xazax.hun, rnkovacs, cfe-commits, MTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45086
llvm-svn: 328919
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 328913
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
An offset might be unknown.
rdar://39054939
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45115
llvm-svn: 328912
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C++ structured bindings for non-tuple-types are defined in a peculiar
way, where the resulting declaration is not a VarDecl, but a
BindingDecl.
That means a lot of existing machinery stops working.
rdar://36912381
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44956
llvm-svn: 328910
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Otherwise the default triple for x86-windows-msvc2015 auto-inserts
__attribute__((thiscall)) to some calls.
Fixes the respective buildbot.
llvm-svn: 328903
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pointer arithmetic on null or undefined pointers results in null or undefined
pointers. This is obvious for undefined pointers; for null pointers it follows
from our incorrect-but-somehow-working approach that declares that 0 (Loc)
doesn't necessarily represent a pointer of numeric address value 0, but instead
it represents any pointer that will cause a valid "null pointer dereference"
issue when dereferenced.
For now we've been seeing through pointer arithmetic at the original dereference
expression, i.e. in bugreporter::getDerefExpr(), but not during further
investigation of the value's origins in bugreporter::trackNullOrUndefValue().
The patch fixes it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45071
llvm-svn: 328896
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sometimes template instantiation causes CXXBindTemporaryExpr to be missing in
its usual spot. In CFG, temporary destructors work by relying on
CXXBindTemporaryExprs, so they won't work in this case.
Avoid the crash and notify the clients that we've encountered an unsupported AST
by failing to provide the ill-formed construction context for the temporary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44955
llvm-svn: 328895
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not enough work has been done so far to ensure correctness of construction
contexts in the CFG when C++17 copy elision is in effect, so for now we
should drop construction contexts in the CFG and in the analyzer when
they seem different from what we support anyway.
This includes initializations with conditional operators and return values
across multiple stack frames.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44854
llvm-svn: 328893
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The RUN lines were removed, but the corresponding CHECK lines never
went away.
llvm-svn: 328891
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
variables.
Added emission of the offloading data sections for the variables within
declare target regions + fixes emission of the declare target variables
marked as declare target not within the declare target region.
llvm-svn: 328888
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The wrong source range was being provided in some case, fix that to get
a better fixit.
rdar://problem/38520199
llvm-svn: 328857
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
be debugged.
llvm-svn: 328853
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 328837
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 328836
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Allow rN registers to be simply parsed as correspoing xN registers.
The "register ... asm("rN")" is an command to the
compiler's register allocator, not an operand to any individual assembly
instruction. GCC documents this syntax as "...the name of the register
that should be used."
This is needed to support the changes in Linux kernel (see
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/1/268 )
Note: This will add support only for the limited use case of
register ... asm("rN"). Any other uses that make rN leak into assembly
are not supported.
Reviewers: kristof.beyls, rengolin, peter.smith, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Subscribers: javed.absar, eraman, cfe-commits, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44815
llvm-svn: 328829
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
from the wrong auto-releasing pool, as such writes may crash.
rdar://25301111
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44722
llvm-svn: 328827
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 328825
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit generalizes NRVO to cover C structs (both trivial and
non-trivial structs).
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44968
llvm-svn: 328809
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Deprecation replacement can be any text but if it looks like a name of
ObjC method and has the same number of arguments as original method,
replace all slot names so after applying a fix-it you have valid code.
rdar://problem/36660853
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, erik.pilkington, rsmith
Reviewed By: erik.pilkington
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jkorous-apple
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44589
llvm-svn: 328807
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 328801
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks to rnk for the suggestion.
llvm-svn: 328800
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Fixing clang-test on FreeBSD as a follow-up of https://reviews.llvm.org/D43378 to handle the revert happened in r325749.
Reviewers: devnexen, krytarowski, dberris
Subscribers: emaste, dberris, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45002
llvm-svn: 328797
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch sets target specific calling convention for CUDA kernels in IR.
Patch by Greg Rodgers.
Revised and lit test added by Yaxun Liu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44747
llvm-svn: 328795
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Greg Rodgers.
Revised and lit test added by Yaxun Liu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44987
llvm-svn: 328793
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 328791
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The conversion of operatios to bitcode helps to eliminate an additional
store in certain cases. We used to lower these load intrinsics in DAG to
DAG conversion by which time, the "Dead Store Elimination" pass is
already run. There is an associated LLVM patch.
Patch by Sumanth Gundapaneni.
llvm-svn: 328776
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in templatized code under ARC
The AST for the fragment
```
@interface I
@end
template <typename>
void decode(I *p) {
for (I *k in p) {}
}
void decode(I *p) {
decode<int>(p);
}
```
differs heavily when templatized and non-templatized:
```
|-FunctionTemplateDecl 0x7fbfe0863940 <line:4:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 decode
| |-TemplateTypeParmDecl 0x7fbfe0863690 <line:4:11> col:11 typename depth 0 index 0
| |-FunctionDecl 0x7fbfe08638a0 <line:5:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 decode 'void (I *__strong)'
| | |-ParmVarDecl 0x7fbfe08637a0 <col:13, col:16> col:16 referenced p 'I *__strong'
| | `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b88 <col:19, line:7:1>
| | `-ObjCForCollectionStmt 0x7fbfe0863b50 <line:6:3, col:20>
| | |-DeclStmt 0x7fbfe0863a50 <col:8, col:13>
| | | `-VarDecl 0x7fbfe08639f0 <col:8, col:11> col:11 k 'I *const __strong'
| | |-ImplicitCastExpr 0x7fbfe0863a90 <col:16> 'I *' <LValueToRValue>
| | | `-DeclRefExpr 0x7fbfe0863a68 <col:16> 'I *__strong' lvalue ParmVar 0x7fbfe08637a0 'p' 'I *__strong'
| | `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b78 <col:19, col:20>
| `-FunctionDecl 0x7fbfe0863f80 <line:5:1, line:7:1> line:5:6 used decode 'void (I *__strong)'
| |-TemplateArgument type 'int'
| |-ParmVarDecl 0x7fbfe0863ef8 <col:13, col:16> col:16 used p 'I *__strong'
| `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0890cf0 <col:19, line:7:1>
| `-ObjCForCollectionStmt 0x7fbfe0890cc8 <line:6:3, col:20>
| |-DeclStmt 0x7fbfe0890c70 <col:8, col:13>
| | `-VarDecl 0x7fbfe0890c00 <col:8, col:11> col:11 k 'I *__strong' callinit
| | `-ImplicitValueInitExpr 0x7fbfe0890c60 <<invalid sloc>> 'I *__strong'
| |-ImplicitCastExpr 0x7fbfe0890cb0 <col:16> 'I *' <LValueToRValue>
| | `-DeclRefExpr 0x7fbfe0890c88 <col:16> 'I *__strong' lvalue ParmVar 0x7fbfe0863ef8 'p' 'I *__strong'
| `-CompoundStmt 0x7fbfe0863b78 <col:19, col:20>
```
Note how in the instantiated version ImplicitValueInitExpr unexpectedly appears.
While objects are auto-initialized under ARC, it does not make sense to
have an initializer for a for-loop variable, and it makes even less
sense to have such a different AST for instantiated and non-instantiated
version.
Digging deeper, I have found that there are two separate Sema* files for
dealing with templates and for dealing with non-templatized code.
In a non-templatized version, an initialization was performed only for
variables which are not loop variables for an Objective-C loop and not
variables for a C++ for-in loop:
```
if (FRI && (Tok.is(tok::colon) || isTokIdentifier_in())) {
bool IsForRangeLoop = false;
if (TryConsumeToken(tok::colon, FRI->ColonLoc)) {
IsForRangeLoop = true;
if (Tok.is(tok::l_brace))
FRI->RangeExpr = ParseBraceInitializer();
else
FRI->RangeExpr = ParseExpression();
}
Decl *ThisDecl = Actions.ActOnDeclarator(getCurScope(), D);
if (IsForRangeLoop)
Actions.ActOnCXXForRangeDecl(ThisDecl);
Actions.FinalizeDeclaration(ThisDecl);
D.complete(ThisDecl);
return Actions.FinalizeDeclaratorGroup(getCurScope(), DS, ThisDecl);
}
SmallVector<Decl *, 8> DeclsInGroup;
Decl *FirstDecl = ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(
D, ParsedTemplateInfo(), FRI);
```
However the code in SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl was inconsistent,
guarding only against C++ for-in loops.
rdar://38391075
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44989
llvm-svn: 328749
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ObjC and ObjC++ pass non-trivial structs in a way that is incompatible
with each other. For example:
typedef struct {
id f0;
__weak id f1;
} S;
// this code is compiled in c++.
extern "C" {
void foo(S s);
}
void caller() {
// the caller passes the parameter indirectly and destructs it.
foo(S());
}
// this function is compiled in c.
// 'a' is passed directly and is destructed in the callee.
void foo(S a) {
}
This patch fixes the incompatibility by passing and returning structs
with __strong or weak fields using the C ABI in C++ mode. __strong and
__weak fields in a struct do not cause the struct to be destructed in
the caller and __strong fields do not cause the struct to be passed
indirectly.
Also, this patch fixes the microsoft ABI bug mentioned here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039?id=128767#inline-364710
rdar://problem/38887866
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44908
llvm-svn: 328731
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These instructions have been around for a long time, but we
haven't supported intrinsics for them. The "new" vesrions use
the CSx register for the start of the buffer instead of the K
field in the Mx register.
There is a related llvm patch.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328725
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were assuming that vbtable indices were assigned in layout order in
our comparison, which is not the case. When a virtual method, such as
the destructor, appears in multiple vftables, the vftable that appears
first in object layout order is the one that points to the main
implementation of that method. The later vftables use thunks.
In this layout, we adjusted "this" in the main implementation by the
amount that is appropriate for 'B' instead of 'A', even though the main
implementation is found in D's vftable for A:
struct A {
virtual ~A() {}
};
struct B {
virtual ~B() {}
};
struct C : virtual B {};
struct D : virtual A, C {};
D's layout looks like:
0 D subobject (empty)
0 C base suboject
8 A base subobject
16 B base subobject
With this fix, we correctly adjust by -8 in D's deleting destructor
instead of -16.
Fixes PR36921.
llvm-svn: 328723
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The "previous definition is here" note is not helpful if there is no location information. The note will reference nothing in such a case. This patch first checks to see if there is location data, and if so the note diagnostic is emitted.
This fixes PR15409. The issue in the first comment seems to already be resolved. This patch addresses the second example.
Reviewers: bruno, rsmith
Reviewed By: bruno
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44901
llvm-svn: 328712
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the declare target variables are emitted for the device,
constructors|destructors for these variables must emitted and registered
by the runtime in the offloading sections.
llvm-svn: 328705
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This patch doing more check and verify the -march= string and will issue
an error if it's a invalid combination.
Reviewers: asb, apazos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44189
Patch by Kito Cheng.
llvm-svn: 328690
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The diagnostic system for Clang can already handle many AST nodes. Instead
of converting them to strings first, just hand the AST node directly to
the diagnostic system and let it handle the output. Minor changes in some
diagnostic output.
llvm-svn: 328688
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
structs.
r326307 and r327870 made changes that allowed using non-trivial C
structs with fields qualified with __strong or __weak. This commit makes
the following C++ triviality type traits available to non-trivial C
structs:
__has_trivial_assign
__has_trivial_move_assign
__has_trivial_copy
__has_trivial_move_constructor
__has_trivial_constructor
__has_trivial_destructor
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44913
llvm-svn: 328680
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
rdar://problem/35539384
Reviewers: ahatanak, nicholas, rsmith, jkorous-apple
Reviewed By: jkorous-apple
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jkorous-apple
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42938
llvm-svn: 328671
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
required members
When SemaCoroutine looks for await_resume, it means it. No need for helpful: "Did you mean await_ready?" messages.
Fixes PR33477 and a couple of FIXMEs in test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp
llvm-svn: 328663
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 328657
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we have a category implementation without a corresponding interface
(which is an error by itself), semantic checks for property accesses
will attempt to access a null interface declaration and then segfault.
Error out in such cases instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44916
llvm-svn: 328654
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 328641
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extended the matched assignment operators when checking for bound changes in a body of the loop by using the freshly added isAssignmentOperator matcher.
This covers all the (current) possible assignments, tests added as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38921
llvm-svn: 328619
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch follows up on r328602, which fixed the spurious unused
result warning for `co_await`.
llvm-svn: 328607
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Currently an invalid source range is generated for the member call expressions of `co_await`. The end location of the call expression is the `co_await` token loc, while the start is the location of the operand. This causes crashes when the source range is used to produce diagnostics.
This patch fixes the issues by using the expression location instead of the token location when building the member calls.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, rsmith, vsk, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, modocache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44915
llvm-svn: 328606
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, anytime the result of the resume expression in
operator co_await was unused, a warning was generated. This
patch fixes the issue by only generating the unused result warning
if calling `await_resume()` would also generate a warning.
llvm-svn: 328602
|