| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some files had CRLF line terminators, some only had a mixture of
CRLF and LF. Switch to LF.
llvm-svn: 202659
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Necessary to parse Microsoft ATL code.
Example:
int array[] = {
0,
__if_exists(CLASS::Type) {2, }
3
};
will declare an array of 2 or 3 elements depending on if CLASS::Type exists or not.
llvm-svn: 146447
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Microsoft __if_exists/__if_not_exists statement. Also note that we
weren't traversing DeclarationNameInfo *at all* within the
RecursiveASTVisitor, which would be rather fatal for variadic
templates.
llvm-svn: 142906
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
statements. As noted in the documentation for the AST node, the
semantics of __if_exists/__if_not_exists are somewhat different from
the way Visual C++ implements them, because our parsed-template
representation can't accommodate VC++ semantics without serious
contortions. Hopefully this implementation is "good enough".
llvm-svn: 142901
|
|
|
analysis to separate dependent names from non-dependent names. For
dependent names, we'll behave differently from Visual C++:
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists at class scope, we'll just warn
and then ignore them.
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists in statements, we'll treat the
inner statement as a compound statement, which we only instantiate
in templates where the dependent name (after instantiation)
exists. This behavior is different from VC++, but it's as close as
we can get without encroaching ridiculousness.
The latter part (dependent statements) is not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 142864
|
