| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
expressions that look like pseudo-destructors, e.g.,
p->T::~T()
where p has dependent type.
At template instantiate time, we determine whether we actually have a
pseudo-destructor or a member access, and funnel down to the
appropriate routine in Sema.
Fixes PR6380.
llvm-svn: 97092
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dependent.
Avoids an assertion arising during object-argument initialization in overload
resolution. In theory we can resolve this at definition time if the class
hierarchy for the member is fully known.
llvm-svn: 91747
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 86079
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
into an (implicit) member access expression. Fixes PR5220
llvm-svn: 84848
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
expressions, e.g.,
p->~T()
when p is a pointer to a scalar type.
We don't currently diagnose errors when pseudo-destructor expressions
are used in any way other than by forming a call.
llvm-svn: 81009
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
things, this means that we can properly cope with member access
expressions such as
t->operator T()
where T is a template parameter (or other dependent type).
llvm-svn: 80957
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
involve qualified names, e.g., x->Base::f. We now maintain enough
information in the AST to compare the results of the name lookup of
"Base" in the scope of the postfix-expression (determined at template
definition time) and in the type of the object expression.
llvm-svn: 80953
|
|
|
with to properly support member access expressions in templates. This
test is XFAIL'd, because we get it completely wrong, but I've made the
minimal changes to the representation to at least avoid a crash.
llvm-svn: 80856
|
