| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Recommit of r335084 after revert in r335516.
... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse order, and therefore printed in the wrong order in
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effect, especially on
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attributes' order was changed instead.
This unfortunately causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be
textually after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes
are merged, but are incompatible to each other. Interchanging the role
of the the main and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where
two different declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple
attributes of the same declaration) are merged to be reverse. There is
no easy fix because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 338800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
__builtin_memcpy and __builtin_memmove (in non-type-punning cases)."
It caused asserts during Chromium builds, see reply on the cfe-commits thread.
> This is intended to permit libc++ to make std::copy etc constexpr
> without sacrificing the optimization that uses memcpy on
> trivially-copyable types.
>
> __builtin_strcpy and __builtin_wcscpy are not handled by this change.
> They'd be straightforward to add, but we haven't encountered a need for
> them just yet.
llvm-svn: 338602
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
warnings.
llvm-svn: 338467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds support for a new attribute, [[clang::lifetimebound]], that
indicates that the lifetime of a function result is related to one of the
function arguments. When walking an initializer to make sure that the lifetime
of the initial value is at least as long as the lifetime of the initialized
object, we step through parameters (including the implicit object parameter of
a non-static member function) that are marked with this attribute.
There's nowhere to write an attribute on the implicit object parameter, so in
lieu of that, it may be applied to a function type (where it appears
immediately after the cv-qualifiers and ref-qualifier, which is as close to a
declaration of the implicit object parameter as we have). I'm currently
modeling this in the AST as the attribute appertaining to the function type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49922
llvm-svn: 338464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
__builtin_memmove (in non-type-punning cases).
This is intended to permit libc++ to make std::copy etc constexpr
without sacrificing the optimization that uses memcpy on
trivially-copyable types.
__builtin_strcpy and __builtin_wcscpy are not handled by this change.
They'd be straightforward to add, but we haven't encountered a need for
them just yet.
llvm-svn: 338455
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
an initializer is self-referential.
llvm-svn: 338230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, we just canonicalized the type, but this lead to crashes with
parameter types that referred to ParmVarDecls of the constructor. There may be
more cases that this TreeTransform needs to handle though, such as a constructor
parameter type referring to a member in an unevaluated context. Canonicalization
doesn't address these cases either though, so we can address them as-needed in
follow-up commits.
rdar://41330135
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49439
llvm-svn: 338165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Only apply this exception on a type that we're able to check.
rdar://41903969
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49868
llvm-svn: 338089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Check each case value in turn while parsing it, performing the
conversion to the switch type within the context of the expression
itself. This will become necessary in order to properly handle cleanups
for temporaries created as part of the case label (in an upcoming
patch). For now it's just good hygiene.
This necessitates moving the checking for the switch condition itself to
earlier, so that the destination type is available when checking the
case labels.
As a nice side-effect, we get slightly improved diagnostic quality and
error recovery by separating the case expression checking from the case
statement checking and from tracking whether there are discarded case
labels.
llvm-svn: 338056
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch thanks to Aaron Puchert!
llvm-svn: 338024
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes a false-positive warning found by selfhost.
llvm-svn: 337857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
As discussed in [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38166 | PR38166 ]], we need to be able to distinqush whether the cast
we are visiting is actually a cast, or part of an `ExplicitCast`.
There are at least four ways to get there:
1. Introduce a new `CastKind`, and use it instead of `IntegralCast` if we are in `ExplicitCast`.
Would work, but does not scale - what if we will need more of these cast kinds?
2. Introduce a flag in `CastExprBits`, whether this cast is part of `ExplicitCast` or not.
Would work, but it isn't immediately clear where it needs to be set.
2. Fix `ScalarExprEmitter::VisitCastExpr()` to visit these `NoOp` casts.
As pointed out by @rsmith, CodeGenFunction::EmitMaterializeTemporaryExpr calls
skipRValueSubobjectAdjustments, which steps over the CK_NoOp cast`,
which explains why we currently don't visit those.
This is probably impossible, as @efriedma points out, that is intentional as per `[class.temporary]` in the standard
3. And the simplest one, just record which NoOp casts we skip.
It just kinda works as-is afterwards.
But, the approach with a flag is the least intrusive one, and is probably the best one overall.
Reviewers: rsmith, rjmccall, majnemer, efriedma
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, aaron.ballman, vsk, llvm-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49508
llvm-svn: 337815
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 337792
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
non-lifetime-extended temporary object.
llvm-svn: 337790
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 337767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clang would crash when instantiating a BlockDecl that appeared in a
default-member-initializer of a class template. Fix this by deferring the
instantiation until we instantate the BlockExpr.
rdar://41200624
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49688
llvm-svn: 337766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
expressions.
CodeGen can't cope with that yet. Instead, produce a "not supported"
warning for now and don't extend lifetime.
llvm-svn: 337744
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
checking.
llvm-svn: 337743
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 337738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reinstates r337627, reverted in r337671, with a fix to correctly
handle the lvalueness of array subscript expressions on pointers.
llvm-svn: 337726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Discovered because of: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38235
It seems to me that a scoped enum should NOT be an integral constant expression
without a cast, so this seems like a sensical change.
Attributes that check for an integer parameter simply use this function to
ensure that they have an integer, so it was previously allowing a scoped enum.
Also added a test based on Richard's feedback to ensure that case labels still work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49599
llvm-svn: 337585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As documented here: https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/682969 and
https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/523346. cpu_dispatch multiversioning
is an ICC feature that provides for function multiversioning.
This feature is implemented with two attributes: First, cpu_specific,
which specifies the individual function versions. Second, cpu_dispatch,
which specifies the location of the resolver function and the list of
resolvable functions.
This is valuable since it provides a mechanism where the resolver's TU
can be specified in one location, and the individual implementions
each in their own translation units.
The goal of this patch is to be source-compatible with ICC, so this
implementation diverges from the ICC implementation in a few ways:
1- Linux x86/64 only: This implementation uses ifuncs in order to
properly dispatch functions. This is is a valuable performance benefit
over the ICC implementation. A future patch will be provided to enable
this feature on Windows, but it will obviously more closely fit ICC's
implementation.
2- CPU Identification functions: ICC uses a set of custom functions to identify
the feature list of the host processor. This patch uses the cpu_supports
functionality in order to better align with 'target' multiversioning.
1- cpu_dispatch function def/decl: ICC's cpu_dispatch requires that the function
marked cpu_dispatch be an empty definition. This patch supports that as well,
however declarations are also permitted, since the linker will solve the
issue of multiple emissions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47474
llvm-svn: 337552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C++2a via http://wg21.link/p0355 permits the library
literals of 'd' and 'y'. This patch enables them in the
Lexer so that they can be properly parsed.
Note that 'd' gets confused with the hex character, so
modifications to how octal, binary, and decimal numbers are
parsed were required. Since this is simply making previously
invalid code legal, this should be fine.
Hex still greedily parses the 'd' as a hexit, since it would
a: violate [lex.ext]p1
b: break existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49504
llvm-svn: 337454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch uses CodeSegAttr to represent __declspec(code_seg) rather than
building on the existing support for #pragma code_seg.
The code_seg declspec is applied on functions and classes. This attribute
enables the placement of code into separate named segments, including compiler-
generated codes and template instantiations.
For more information, please see the following:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn636922.aspx
This patch fixes the regression for the support for attribute ((section).
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/commit/746b78de7812bc785fbb5207b788348040b23fa7
Patch by Soumi Manna (Manna)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48841
llvm-svn: 337420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a
reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The
standard wording here is imprecise, but we interpret it as meaning that
any time a mem-initializer would result in lifetime extension, the
program is ill-formed.
This reinstates r337226, reverted in r337255, with a fix for the
InitializedEntity alignment problem that was breaking ARM buildbots.
llvm-svn: 337329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r337152. This applies to non-constants too. The real
explanation is that the capture is not ODR-used, but putting that into
the warning message seems ... worse.
llvm-svn: 337278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
lifetime extension."
This change breaks on ARM because pointers to clang::InitializedEntity are only
4 byte aligned and do not have 3 bits to store values. A possible solution
would be to change the fields in clang::InitializedEntity to enforce a bigger
alignment requirement.
The error message is
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:132:3: error: static_assert failed "PointerIntPair with integer size too large for pointer"
static_assert(IntBits <= PtrTraits::NumLowBitsAvailable,
include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:73:13: note: in instantiation of template class 'llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> >' requested here
Value = Info::updateInt(Info::updatePointer(0, PtrVal),
llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerIntPair.h:51:5: note: in instantiation of member function 'llvm::PointerIntPair<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, (anonymous namespace)::LifetimeKind, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *>, llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> > >::setPointerAndInt' requested here
setPointerAndInt(PtrVal, IntVal);
^
llvm/tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp:6237:12: note: in instantiation of member function 'llvm::PointerIntPair<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, (anonymous namespace)::LifetimeKind, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *>, llvm::PointerIntPairInfo<const clang::InitializedEntity *, 3, llvm::PointerLikeTypeTraits<const clang::InitializedEntity *> > >::PointerIntPair' requested here
return {Entity, LK_Extended};
Full log here:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-global-isel/builds/1330
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-full/builds/1394
llvm-svn: 337255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change implements C++ DR1696, which makes initialization of a
reference member of a class from a temporary object ill-formed. The
standard wording here is imprecise, but we interpret it as meaning that
any time a mem-initializer would result in lifetime extension, the
program is ill-formed.
llvm-svn: 337226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is one of the darker corners of C++, make it clear that this is
about constants and rephrase it a bit.
Before: lambda capture 'i' is not required to be captured for this use
After: lambda capture of constant 'i' is not required for this use
llvm-svn: 337152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
analysis behavior.
Patch thanks to Aaron Puchert.
llvm-svn: 337125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As listed in the above PRs, vector_size doesn't allow
dependent types/values. This patch introduces a new
DependentVectorType to handle a VectorType that has a dependent
size or type.
In the future, ALL the vector-types should be able to create one
of these to handle dependent types/sizes as well. For example,
DependentSizedExtVectorType could likely be switched to just use
this instead, though that is left as an exercise for the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49045
llvm-svn: 337036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34668
Pretty straightforward.
Reviewers: rsmith, Rakete1111
Reviewed By: Rakete1111
Subscribers: Rakete1111, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38075
llvm-svn: 337017
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336946
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reference with a braced initializer list
llvm-svn: 336922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D47106 for details.
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47172
llvm-svn: 336844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
The file name was accidentally included when the test file was added.
Test Plan: check-clang
llvm-svn: 336750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
A forward-declared coroutine_traits should trip an error; we need
a complete type.
Unfortunately, in debug mode only, we trip an assert when attempting
to provide the fully qualified type for the error message.
If you try to compile a program with a forward-declared
coroutine_traits in debug mode, clang will crash.
I've included a test for the behavior and removed the q modifier
on the error message. This prevents the crash in debug mode and
does not change the behavior for the error message on a
forward-declaration of a coroutine_traits type.
Test Plan:
I've included a test for the forward-declaration.
Patch by Tanoy Sinha!
Reviewers: modocache, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49099
llvm-svn: 336748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows more qualification conversions, eg. conversion from
'int *(*)[]' -> 'const int *const (*)[]'
is now permitted, along with all the consequences of that: more types
are similar, more cases are permitted by const_cast, and conversely,
fewer "casting away constness" cases are permitted by reinterpret_cast.
llvm-svn: 336745
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 336727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The member init list for the sole constructor for CodeGenFunction
has gotten out of hand, so this patch moves the non-parameter-dependent
initializations into the member value inits.
llvm-svn: 336726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BindingDecls have null type until their initializer is processed, so we can't
assume that a correction candidate has non-null type.
rdar://41559582
llvm-svn: 336634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
deprecated.
Add a -Wdeprecated warning for this in C++2a onwards. (In C++17 and
before, there isn't a reasonable alternative because [=,this] is
ill-formed.)
llvm-svn: 336480
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a .isNull() check to returned QualType. Fixes PR38077
llvm-svn: 336475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Can happen when getConstructorName is called on invalid decls,
specifically the ones that do not have the injected class name.
Reviewers: bkramer, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48880
llvm-svn: 336244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The constexpr evaluator was erroring out because these templates weren't
defined. Despite being used in a discarded statement, we still need to constexpr
evaluate them, which means that we need to instantiate them. Fixes PR37585.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48322
llvm-svn: 336233
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 335725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r335084 as requested by David Jones and
Eric Christopher because of differences of emitted warnings.
llvm-svn: 335516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Add citations to the Coroutines TS to the `isValidCoroutineContext`
function, as well as a FIXME and test for [expr.await]p2, which states
a co_await expression cannot be used in a default argument.
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewers: GorNishanov, EricWF
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: rsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48519
llvm-svn: 335420
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows to reuse the same diagnostic for OpenCL or CUDA.
llvm-svn: 335358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
dead code.
This is important for C++ templates that essentially compute the valid
input in a way that is constant and will cause all the invalid cases to
be dead code that is deleted. Code in the wild actually does this and
GCC also accepts these kinds of patterns so it is important to support
it.
To make this work, we provide a non-error path to diagnose these issues,
and use a default-error warning instead. This keeps the relatively
strict handling but prevents nastiness like SFINAE on these errors. It
also allows us to safely use the system to diagnose this only when it
occurs at runtime (in emitted code).
Entertainingly, this required fixing the syntax in various other ways
for the x86 test because we never bothered to diagnose that the returns
were invalid.
Since debugging these compile failures was super confusing, I've also
improved the diagnostic to actually say what the value was. Most of the
checks I've made ignore this to simplify maintenance, but I've checked
it in a few places to make sure the diagnsotic is working.
Depends on D48462. Without that, we might actually crash some part of
the compiler after bypassing the error here.
Thanks to Richard, Ben Kramer, and especially Craig Topper for all the
help here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48464
llvm-svn: 335309
|