| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rather, they are subexpressions of the enclosing lambda-expression, and
any temporaries in them are destroyed at the end of that
full-expression, or when the corresponding lambda-expression is
destroyed if they are lifetime-extended.
llvm-svn: 344801
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 344762
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 344761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Addresses PR24718 by checking for enumerators that shadow other enumerators. Catches issues like:
enum E1{e1};
void f(void) {
enum E2{e1};
}
llvm-svn: 344259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The test added in r344146 was failing because the ABI on Windows is
different, and that test includes ABI-specific details. The test now
harcodes which ABI to use so we can rely on those details.
llvm-svn: 344159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The problem was that MergeFunctionDecl sometimes needs the injected template
arguments of a FunctionTemplateDecl, but is called before adding the new
template to the redecl chain. This leads to multiple common pointers in the same
redecl chain, each with their own identical instantiation. Fix this by merging
the the common state before inserting the new template into the redecl chain.
rdar://44810129
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53046
llvm-svn: 344157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
members
Summary: https://llvm.org/PR39118
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rnk
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52675
llvm-svn: 344146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Addressing https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37265.
Implements [class.copy]/33 of coroutines TS.
When the criteria for elision of a copy/move operation are met, but not
for an exception-declaration, and the object to be copied is designated by an
lvalue, or when the expression in a return or co_return statement is a
(possibly parenthesized) id-expression that names an object with automatic
storage duration declared in the body or parameter-declaration-clause of the
innermost enclosing function or lambda-expression, overload resolution to select
the constructor for the copy or the return_value overload to call is first
performed as if the object were designated by an rvalue.
Patch by Tanoy Sinha!
Reviewers: modocache, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: modocache, GorNishanov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51741
llvm-svn: 343949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
We unwrap conditional expressions containing try-lock functions.
Additionally we don't acquire on conditional expression branches, since
that is usually not helpful. When joining the branches we would almost
certainly get a warning then.
Hopefully fixes an issue that was raised in D52398.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52888
llvm-svn: 343902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The comment said it was intentionally not emitting any diagnostic
because the declaration itself was already diagnosed. However,
everywhere else that wants to not emit a diagnostic without an extra
note emits note_invalid_subexpr_in_const_expr instead, which gets
suppressed later.
This was the only place which did not emit a diagnostic note.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52919
llvm-svn: 343867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Instead of only examining call arguments, we also examine constructor
arguments applying the same rules.
That was an opportunity for refactoring the examination procedure to
work with iterators instead of integer indices. For the case of
CallExprs no functional change is intended.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: JonasToth, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52443
llvm-svn: 343831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This attribute allows excluding a member of a class template from being part
of an explicit template instantiation of that class template. This also makes
sure that code using such a member will not take for granted that an external
instantiation exists in another translation unit. The attribute was discussed
on cfe-dev at [1] and is primarily motivated by the removal of always_inline
in libc++ to control what's part of the ABI (see links in [1]).
[1]: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-August/059024.html
rdar://problem/43428125
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51789
llvm-svn: 343790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix code for constant evaluation of __builtin_memcpy() and
__builtin_memmove() that would attempt to divide by zero when given two
pointers to an incomplete array.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51855
llvm-svn: 343761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
When people are really sure they'll get the lock they sometimes use
__builtin_expect. It's also used by some assertion implementations.
Asserting that try-lock succeeded is basically the same as asserting
that the lock is not held by anyone else (and acquiring it).
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: kristina, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52398
llvm-svn: 343681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't yet support this for the case where a range-based for loop is
implicitly rewritten to an ObjC for..in statement.
llvm-svn: 343350
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
deduction for new-expressions.
llvm-svn: 343293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
render the function deleted instead of rendering the program ill-formed.
This change also adds an enabled-by-default warning for the case where
an explicitly-defaulted special member function of a non-template class
is implicitly deleted by the type checking rules. (This fires either due
to this language change or due to pre-C++20 reasons for the member being
implicitly deleted). I've tested this on a large codebase and found only
bugs (where the program means something that's clearly different from
what the programmer intended), so this is enabled by default, but we
should revisit this if there are problems with this being enabled by
default.
llvm-svn: 343285
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
default-constructible and assignable.
llvm-svn: 343279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes PR39090.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52571
llvm-svn: 343184
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C++20.
llvm-svn: 343131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for loop if both members exist.
This resolves a DR whereby an errant 'begin' or 'end' member in a base
class could result in a derived class not being usable as a range with
non-member 'begin' and 'end'.
llvm-svn: 342925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Objects are determined to be smart pointers if they have both a star and arrow
operator. Some implementations of smart pointers have these overloaded
operators in a base class, while the check only searched the derived class.
This fix will also look for the operators in the base class.
llvm-svn: 342794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes rdar://43760099
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52271
llvm-svn: 342672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
When thread safety annotations are used without capability arguments,
they are assumed to apply to `this` instead. So we warn when either
`this` doesn't exist, or the class is not a capability type.
This is based on earlier work by Josh Gao that was committed in r310403,
but reverted in r310698 because it didn't properly work in template
classes. See also D36237.
The solution is not to go via the QualType of `this`, which is then a
template type, hence the attributes are not known because it could be
specialized. Instead we look directly at the class in which we are
contained.
Additionally I grouped two of the warnings together. There are two
issues here: the existence of `this`, which requires us to be a
non-static member function, and the appropriate annotation on the class
we are contained in. So we don't distinguish between not being in a
class and being static, because in both cases we don't have `this`.
Fixes PR38399.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, jmgao, rtrieu
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901
llvm-svn: 342605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For function pointers, the FunctionDecl of the callee is unknown, so
getDirectCallee will return nullptr. We have to catch that case to avoid
crashing. We assume there is no attribute then.
llvm-svn: 342519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
We run the tests for -Wthread-safety-{negative,verbose} with the new
attributes as well as the old ones. Also put the macros in a header so
that we don't have to copy them all around.
The warn-thread-safety-parsing.cpp test checks for warnings depending on
the actual attribute name, so it can't undergo the same treatment.
Together with D49275 this should fix PR33754.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, grooverdan
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52141
llvm-svn: 342418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Attributes on member classes of class templates and member class templates
of class templates are not currently instantiated. This was discovered by
Richard Smith here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-September/059291.html
This commit makes sure that attributes are instantiated properly. This
commit does not fix the broken behavior for member partial and explicit
specializations of class templates.
PR38913
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51997
llvm-svn: 342238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A lambda's closure is initialized when the lambda is declared. For
implicit captures, the initialization code emitted from EmitLambdaExpr
references source locations *within the lambda body* in the function
containing the lambda. This results in a poor debugging experience: we
step to the line containing the lambda, then into lambda, out again,
over and over, until every capture's field is initialized.
To improve stepping behavior, assign the starting location of the lambda
to expressions which initialize an implicit capture within it.
rdar://39807527
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50927
llvm-svn: 342194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
incomplete type.
Also improve the diagnostics for similar situations.
llvm-svn: 342192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem was that we were appending to the source location info buffer in the
copy assignment operator (instead of overwriting).
rdar://42746401
llvm-svn: 341869
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
deduced type (if known).
llvm-svn: 341858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is non-sensical to use cpu-specific/cpu-dispatch multiversioning
on a lambda, so prevent it when trying to add the attribute.
llvm-svn: 341833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
match when checking for redeclaration of a function template.
This properly handles differences in deduced return types, particularly
when performing redeclaration checks for a friend function template.
llvm-svn: 341778
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
friend function declarations of class templates.
llvm-svn: 341775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
accessible from the context where aggregate initialization occurs.
rdar://problem/38168772
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45898
llvm-svn: 341629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
destructors.
We previously tried to patch up the exception specification after
completing the class, which went wrong when the exception specification
was needed within the class body (in particular, by a friend
redeclaration of the destructor in a nested class). We now mark the
destructor as having a not-yet-computed exception specification
immediately after creating it.
This requires delaying various checks against the exception
specification (where we'd previously have just got the wrong exception
specification, and now find we have an exception specification that we
can't compute yet) when those checks fire while the class is being
defined.
This also exposed an issue that we were missing a CodeSynthesisContext
for computation of exception specifications (otherwise we'd fail to make
the module containing the definition of the class visible when computing
its members' exception specs). Adding that incidentally also gives us a
diagnostic quality improvement.
This has also exposed an pre-existing problem: making the exception
specification evaluation context a non-SFINAE context (as it should be)
results in a bootstrap failure; PR38850 filed for this.
llvm-svn: 341499
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 341099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* generic lambdas
* return type deduction
* class template argument deduction
llvm-svn: 341098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
initializer.
This fixes PR38640.
llvm-svn: 340636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
It's already allowed to prematurely release a scoped lock, now we also
allow relocking it again, possibly even in another mode.
This is the second attempt, the first had been merged as r339456 and
reverted in r339558 because it caused a crash.
Reviewers: delesley, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: delesley, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: hokein, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49885
llvm-svn: 340459
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 340311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit adds the flag -fno-c++-static-destructors and the attributes
[[clang::no_destroy]] and [[clang::always_destroy]]. no_destroy specifies that a
specific static or thread duration variable shouldn't have it's destructor
registered, and is the default in -fno-c++-static-destructors mode.
always_destroy is the opposite, and is the default in -fc++-static-destructors
mode.
A variable whose destructor is disabled (either because of
-fno-c++-static-destructors or [[clang::no_destroy]]) doesn't count as a use of
the destructor, so we don't do any access checking or mark it referenced. We
also don't emit -Wexit-time-destructors for these variables.
rdar://21734598
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50994
llvm-svn: 340306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Specifically, AttributedType now tracks a regular attr::Kind rather than
having its own parallel Kind enumeration, and AttributedTypeLoc now
holds an Attr* instead of holding an ad-hoc collection of Attr fields.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50526
This reinstates r339623, reverted in r339638, with a fix to not fail
template instantiation if we instantiate a QualType with no associated
type source information and we encounter an AttributedType.
llvm-svn: 340215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: Fixes Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27061
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, acoomans
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, acoomans
Subscribers: acoomans, cfe-commits, srhines, pirama
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50467
llvm-svn: 339581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This is for use by clang-tidy's bugprone-use-after-move check -- see
corresponding clang-tidy patch at https://reviews.llvm.org/D49910.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49911
llvm-svn: 339569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r339456.
The change introduces a new crash, see
class SCOPED_LOCKABLE FileLock {
public:
explicit FileLock()
EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(file_);
~FileLock() UNLOCK_FUNCTION(file_);
void Lock() EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(file_);
Mutex file_;
};
void relockShared2() {
FileLock file_lock;
file_lock.Lock();
}
llvm-svn: 339558
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch by Aaron Puchert
llvm-svn: 339456
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
incomplete class template.
llvm-svn: 339210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
__builtin_memmove (in non-type-punning cases).
This is intended to permit libc++ to make std::copy etc constexpr
without sacrificing the optimization that uses memcpy on
trivially-copyable types.
__builtin_strcpy and __builtin_wcscpy are not handled by this change.
They'd be straightforward to add, but we haven't encountered a need for
them just yet.
This reinstates r338455, reverted in r338602, with a fix to avoid trying
to constant-evaluate a memcpy call if either pointer operand has an
invalid designator.
llvm-svn: 338941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
instead of assuming unlock functions always use exclusive locks.
Patch by Aaron Puchert.
llvm-svn: 338912
|