| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We correctly forbid variables but not variable templates. Diagnose this
case instead of crashing.
llvm-svn: 224905
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This tweaks the diagnostic wording slighly, and adds a fixit on a note.
An alternative would be to add the fixit directly on the diagnostic, see
the review thread linked to from the bug for a few notes on that approach.
llvm-svn: 213725
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
to a variable template specialization.
llvm-svn: 196337
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
data member definitions when the variable has an initializer
in its declaration.
For the following code:
struct S {
static const int x = 42;
};
const int S::x = 42;
This patch changes the diagnostic from:
a.cc:4:14: error: redefinition of 'x'
const int S::x = 42;
^
a.cc:2:20: note: previous definition is here
static const int x = 42;
^
to:
a.cc:4:18: error: static data member 'x' already has an initializer
const int S::x = 42;
^
a.cc:2:24: note: previous initialization is here
static const int x = 42;
^
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2235
llvm-svn: 195306
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
appropriately, especially when they appear within class templates.
llvm-svn: 191548
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
something, for variable templates.
llvm-svn: 191278
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
defined with no initializer.
llvm-svn: 190970
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
referenced, try to instantiate its definition in order to complete the type.
llvm-svn: 190910
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 188975
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 188974
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
least one bug, as it does not respect the variable template specialization hierarchy well.
llvm-svn: 188969
|
|
|
fully supported, up to some limitations documented as FIXMEs or TODO. Static data member templates work very partially. Static data member templates of class templates need particular attention...
llvm-svn: 187762
|
