| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In case of copy constructor is implicitly deleted it's still shown.
PR34402 describes a way to reproduce that.
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37435
llvm-svn: 312785
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a builtin type.
rdar://20149746
llvm-svn: 232145
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code building the code completion string for overloads was providing
less detail compared to the one building completion strings for function
declarations. There was no information about optionals and no information
about what's a parameter and what's a function identifier, everything
besides ResultType, CurrentParameter and special characters was classified
as Text.
This makes code completion strings for overload candidates to follow a
pattern very similar, but not identical, to the one in use for function
declarations:
- return type chunk: ResultType
- function identifier chunk: Text
- parameter chunks: Placeholder
- optional parameter chunks: Optional
- current parameter chunk: CurrentParameter
llvm-svn: 227309
|
|
|
The improved completion in call context now works with:
- Functions.
- Member functions.
- Constructors.
- New expressions.
- Function call expressions.
- Template variants of the previous.
There are still rough edges to be fixed:
- Provide support for optional parameters. (fix known)
- Provide support for member initializers. (fix known)
- Provide support for variadic template functions. (fix unknown)
- Others?
llvm-svn: 226670
|
