| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 157154
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm pretty sure we are in fact doing the right thing here, but someone who knows the standard better should double-check that we are in fact supposed to zero out the member in the given testcase.
llvm-svn: 157138
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
-std=c++0x. Patch by Ahmed Charles!
llvm-svn: 141900
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
1 of 3 or so.
llvm-svn: 132945
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
for destructors until the class is complete and destructors have been adjusted.
llvm-svn: 131632
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
other things, libcxx not building.
llvm-svn: 131573
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 131528
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 130813
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the body of a delegating constructor call.
This means that the delegating constructor implementation should be
complete and correct, though there are some rough edges (diagnostic
quality with the cycle detection and using a deleted destructor).
llvm-svn: 130803
|
|
|
As far as I know, this implementation is complete but might be missing a
few optimizations. Exceptions and virtual bases are handled correctly.
Because I'm an optimist, the web page has appropriately been updated. If
I'm wrong, feel free to downgrade its support categories.
llvm-svn: 130642
|