| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 230795
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
tests fail.
llvm-svn: 188447
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as well as some significant asymptotic inefficiencies with threading
multiple jumps through deep cleanups.
llvm-svn: 109274
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
mostly in avoiding unnecessary work at compile time but also in producing more
sensible block orderings.
Move the destructor cleanups for local variables over to use lazy cleanups.
Eventually all cleanups will do this; for now we have some awkward code
duplication.
Tell IR generation just to never produce landing pads in -fno-exceptions.
This is a much more comprehensive solution to a problem which previously was
half-solved by checks in most cleanup-generation spots.
llvm-svn: 108270
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 107632
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
self-host. Hopefully these results hold up on different platforms.
I tried to keep the GNU ObjC runtime happy, but it's hard for me to test.
Reimplement how clang generates IR for exceptions. Instead of creating new
invoke destinations which sequentially chain to the previous destination,
push a more semantic representation of *why* we need the cleanup/catch/filter
behavior, then collect that information into a single landing pad upon request.
Also reorganizes how normal cleanups (i.e. cleanups triggered by non-exceptional
control flow) are generated, since it's actually fairly closely tied in with
the former. Remove the need to track which cleanup scope a block is associated
with.
Document a lot of previously poorly-understood (by me, at least) behavior.
The new framework implements the Horrible Hack (tm), which requires every
landing pad to have a catch-all so that inlining will work. Clang no longer
requires the Horrible Hack just to make exceptions flow correctly within
a function, however. The HH is an unfortunate requirement of LLVM's EH IR.
llvm-svn: 107631
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for, and switch), be careful to construct the full expressions as soon
as we perform template instantation, so we don't either forget to call
temporary destructors or destroy temporaries at the wrong time. This
is the template-instantiation analogue to r103187, during which I
hadn't realized that the issue would affect the handling of these
constructs differently inside and outside of templates.
Fixes a regression in Boost.Function.
llvm-svn: 103357
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 103337
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
if/switch/while/do/for statements. Previously, we would end up either:
(1) Forgetting to destroy temporaries created in the condition (!),
(2) Destroying the temporaries created in the condition *before*
converting the condition to a boolean value (or, in the case of a
switch statement, to an integral or enumeral value), or
(3) In a for statement, destroying the condition's temporaries at
the end of the increment expression (!).
We now destroy temporaries in conditions at the right times. This
required some tweaking of the Parse/Sema interaction, since the parser
was building full expressions too early in many places.
Fixes PR7067.
llvm-svn: 103187
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 95658
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 93347
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
statements, e.g.,
for(; X x = X(); ) { ... }
Daniel or Anders, please review!
llvm-svn: 89832
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
we want to test
llvm-svn: 89818
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All statements that involve conditions can now hold on to a separate
condition declaration (a VarDecl), and will use a DeclRefExpr
referring to that VarDecl for the condition expression. ForStmts now
have such a VarDecl (I'd missed those in previous commits).
Also, since this change reworks the Action interface for
if/while/switch/for, use FullExprArg for the full expressions in those
expressions, to ensure that we're emitting
Note that we are (still) not generating the right cleanups for
condition variables in for statements. That will be a follow-on
commit.
llvm-svn: 89817
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cleanups for while loops:
1) Make sure that we destroy the condition variable of a while statement each time through the loop for, e.g.,
while (shared_ptr<WorkInt> p = getWorkItem()) {
// ...
}
2) Make sure that we always enter a new cleanup scope for the body of the while loop, even when there is no compound expression, e.g.,
while (blah)
RAIIObject raii(blah+1);
llvm-svn: 89800
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
make sure that this variable is destroyed when we exit the switch
statement.
llvm-svn: 89776
|
|
|
- Outside the "if", to ensure that we destroy the condition variable
at the end of the "if" statement rather than at the end of the
block containing the "if" statement.
- Inside the "then" and "else" branches, so that we emit then- or
else-local cleanups at the end of the corresponding block when the
block is not a compound statement.
To make adding these new cleanup scopes easier (and since
switch/do/while will all need the same treatment), added the
CleanupScope RAII object to introduce a new cleanup scope and make
sure it gets cleaned up.
llvm-svn: 89773
|
