bcm5719-llvm - Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	PR18097: Support initializing an _Atomic(T) from an object of C++ class type T	Richard Smith	2014-07-31	1	-1/+55
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	or a class derived from T. We already supported this when initializing _Atomic(T) from T for most (and maybe all) other reasonable values of T. llvm-svn: 214390
*	CHECK-LABEL-ify some code gen tests to improve diagnostic experience when ↵	Stephen Lin	2013-08-15	1	-3/+3
\| \| \| \| \| \|	tests fail. llvm-svn: 188447
*	Fix some i1/i8 confusion within _Atomic(bool) in IR generation, both	Douglas Gregor	2012-04-12	1	-1/+24
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	in general (such an atomic has boolean representation) and specifically for IR generation of __c11_atomic_init. The latter also means actually using initialization semantics for this initialization, rather than just creating a store. On a related note, make sure we actually put in non-atomic-to-atomic conversions when performing an implicit conversion sequence. IR generation is far too kind here, but we still want the ASTs to make sense. llvm-svn: 154612
*	Update recently-added test to use new __c11_ form of atomic builtins.	Richard Smith	2012-04-11	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	llvm-svn: 154514
*	Make __atomic_init() (soon to be __c11_atomic_init()) work with non-scalar ↵	David Chisnall	2012-04-11	1	-0/+13
\| \| \| \| \| \|	types. llvm-svn: 154507
*	Allow c++ initialisers to initialise _Atomic fields.	David Chisnall	2012-04-11	1	-0/+12
	llvm-svn: 154499