| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | Fix some i1/i8 confusion within _Atomic(bool) in IR generation, both | Douglas Gregor | 2012-04-12 | 1 | -1/+24 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | in general (such an atomic has boolean representation) and specifically for IR generation of __c11_atomic_init. The latter also means actually using initialization semantics for this initialization, rather than just creating a store. On a related note, make sure we actually put in non-atomic-to-atomic conversions when performing an implicit conversion sequence. IR generation is far too kind here, but we still want the ASTs to make sense. llvm-svn: 154612 | ||||
| * | Update recently-added test to use new __c11_ form of atomic builtins. | Richard Smith | 2012-04-11 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | llvm-svn: 154514 | ||||
| * | Make __atomic_init() (soon to be __c11_atomic_init()) work with non-scalar ↵ | David Chisnall | 2012-04-11 | 1 | -0/+13 |
| | | | | | | | types. llvm-svn: 154507 | ||||
| * | Allow c++ initialisers to initialise _Atomic fields. | David Chisnall | 2012-04-11 | 1 | -0/+12 |
| llvm-svn: 154499 | |||||
 |
index : bcm5719-llvm | |
| Project Ortega BCM5719 LLVM | Raptor Computing Systems |
| summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats |
|