| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit changes the way we blacklist functions in ASan, TSan,
MSan and UBSan. We used to treat function as "blacklisted"
and turned off instrumentation in it in two cases:
1) Function is explicitly blacklisted by its mangled name.
This part is not changed.
2) Function is located in llvm::Module, whose identifier is
contained in the list of blacklisted sources. This is completely
wrong, as llvm::Module may not correspond to the actual source
file function is defined in. Also, function can be defined in
a header, in which case user had to blacklist the .cpp file
this header was #include'd into, not the header itself.
Such functions could cause other problems - for instance, if the
header was included in multiple source files, compiled
separately and linked into a single executable, we could end up
with both instrumented and non-instrumented version of the same
function participating in the same link.
After this change we will make blacklisting decision based on
the SourceLocation of a function definition. If a function is
not explicitly defined in the source file, (for example, the
function is compiler-generated and responsible for
initialization/destruction of a global variable), then it will
be blacklisted if the corresponding global variable is defined
in blacklisted source file, and will be instrumented otherwise.
After this commit, the active users of blacklist files may have
to revisit them. This is a backwards-incompatible change, but
I don't think it's possible or makes sense to support the
old incorrect behavior.
I plan to make similar change for blacklisting GlobalVariables
(which is ASan-specific).
llvm-svn: 219997
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 219969
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 219965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AddressSanitizer can find intra-object-overflow bugs
Summary:
The general approach is to add extra paddings after every field
in AST/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp, then add code to CTORs/DTORs that poisons the paddings
(CodeGen/CGClass.cpp).
Everything is done under the flag -fsanitize-address-field-padding.
The blacklist file (-fsanitize-blacklist) allows to avoid the transformation
for given classes or source files.
See also https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/IntraObjectOverflow
Test Plan: run SPEC2006 and some of the Chromium tests with -fsanitize-address-field-padding
Reviewers: samsonov, rnk, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5687
llvm-svn: 219961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They cannot be written to, so marking them const makes sense and may improve
optimisation.
As a side-effect, SectionInfos has to be moved from Sema to ASTContext.
It also fixes this problem, that occurs when compiling ATL:
warning LNK4254: section 'ATL' (C0000040) merged into '.rdata' (40000040) with different attributes
The ATL headers are putting variables in a special section that's marked
read-only. However, Clang currently can't model that read-onlyness in the IR.
But, by making the variables const, the section does become read-only, and
the linker warning is avoided.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5812
llvm-svn: 219960
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 219952
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 219933
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 219901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CodeGen wouldn't mark the aliasee as thread_local if the aliasee was a
tentative definition.
Even if the definition was already emitted, it would never mark the
alias as thread_local.
This fixes PR21288.
llvm-svn: 219859
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove the use of an unnecessary function. NFC.
llvm-svn: 219850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thumb1 has legitimate reasons for preferring 32-bit alignment of types
i1/i8/i16, since the 16-bit encoding of "add rD, sp, #imm" requires #imm to be
a multiple of 4. However, this is a trade-off betweem code size and RAM usage;
the DataLayout string is not the best place to represent it even if desired.
So this patch removes the extra Thumb requirements, hopefully making ARM and
Thumb completely compatible in this respect.
llvm-svn: 219735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Before, ARM and Thumb mode code had different preferred alignments, which could
lead to some rather unexpected results. There's justification for reducing it
from the default 64-bits (wasted space), but I don't think there is for going
below 32-bits.
There's no actual ABI change here, just to reassure people.
llvm-svn: 219720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This addresses a regression introduced with SVN r219393. A block may be
contained within another block. In such a scenario, we would end up within a
BlockDecl, which is not a NamedDecl (as the names are synthesised). The cast to
a NamedDecl of the DeclContext would then assert as the types are unrelated.
Restore the mangling behaviour to that prior to SVN r219393. If the current
block is contained within a BlockDecl, walk up to the parent DeclContext,
recursively, until we have a non-BlockDecl. This is expected to be a NamedDecl.
Add in a couple of asserts to ensure that the assumption that we only encounter
a block within a NamedDecl or a BlockDecl.
llvm-svn: 219696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously loop hints such as #pragma loop vectorize_width(#) required a constant. This patch allows a constant expression to be used as well. Such as a non-type template parameter or an expression (2 * c + 1).
Reviewed by Richard Smith
llvm-svn: 219589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and !=) to support mixed complex and real operand types.
This requires removing an assert from SemaChecking, and adding support
both to the constant evaluator and the code generator to synthesize the
imaginary part when needed. This seemed somewhat cleaner than having
just the comparison operators force real-to-complex conversions.
I've added test cases for these operations. I'm really terrified that
there were *no* tests in-tree which exercised this.
This turned up when trying to build R after my change to the complex
type lowering.
llvm-svn: 219570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for complex math.
This should fix the windows build bots that started having trouble here
and generally fix complex libcall emission on targets which use sret for
complex data types. It also makes the code a bit simpler (despite
calling into a much more complex bucket of code).
llvm-svn: 219565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
operators where one type is a C complex type, and to emit both the
efficient and correct implementation for complex arithmetic according to
C11 Annex G using this extra information.
For both multiply and divide the old code was writing a long-hand
reduced version of the math without any of the special handling of inf
and NaN recommended by the standard here. Instead of putting more
complexity here, this change does what GCC does which is to emit
a libcall for the fully general case.
However, the old code also failed to do the proper minimization of the
set of operations when there was a mixed complex and real operation. In
those cases, C provides a spec for much more minimal operations that are
valid. Clang now emits the exact suggested operations. This change isn't
*just* about performance though, without minimizing these operations, we
again lose the correct handling of infinities and NaNs. It is critical
that this happen in the frontend based on assymetric type operands to
complex math operations.
The performance implications of this change aren't trivial either. I've
run a set of benchmarks in Eigen, an open source mathematics library
that makes heavy use of complex. While a few have slowed down due to the
libcall being introduce, most sped up and some by a huge amount: up to
100% and 140%.
In order to make all of this work, also match the algorithm in the
constant evaluator to the one in the runtime library. Currently it is
a broken port of the simplifications from C's Annex G to the long-hand
formulation of the algorithm.
Splitting this patch up is very hard because none of this works without
the AST change to preserve non-complex operands. Sorry for the enormous
change.
Follow-up changes will include support for sinking the libcalls onto
cold paths in common cases and fastmath improvements to allow more
aggressive backend folding.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5698
llvm-svn: 219557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make it possible to pass NULL through variadic functions on 64-bit
Windows targets. The Visual C++ headers define NULL to 0, when they
should define it to 0LL on Win64 so that NULL is a pointer-sized
integer.
Fixes PR20949.
Reviewers: thakis, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5480
llvm-svn: 219456
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 219405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Added tests.
Patch by Maxim Blumenthal <maxim.blumenthal@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 219319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We already add the align parameter attribute for function parameters that have
the align_value attribute (or those with a typedef type having that attribute),
which is an important special case, but does not handle pointers with value
alignment assumptions that come into scope in any other way. To handle the
general case, emit an @llvm.assume-based alignment assumption whenever we load
the pointer-typed lvalue of an align_value-attributed variable (except for
function parameters, which we already deal with at entry).
I'll also note that this is more general than Intel's described support in:
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/data-alignment-to-assist-vectorization
which states that the compiler inserts __assume_aligned directives in response
to align_value-attributed variables only for function parameters and for the
initializers of local variables. I think that we can make the optimizer deal
with this more-general scheme (which could lead to a lot of calls to
@llvm.assume inside of loop bodies, for example), but if not, I'll rework this
to be less aggressive.
llvm-svn: 219052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r218917, effectively reapplying r218913. Original
commit message follows.
--
Update debug info testcases for an LLVM metadata schema change to fold
metadata constant operands into a single `MDString`.
Part of PR17891.
llvm-svn: 219011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test includes stdint.h (via stdatomic.h), which might include system
headers (and that might not work, depending on the system configuration).
Attempting to fix llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast.
llvm-svn: 218960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Adds a Clang-specific implementation of C11's stdatomic.h header. On systems,
such as FreeBSD, where a stdatomic.h header is already provided, we defer to
that header instead (using our __has_include_next technology). Otherwise, we
provide an implementation in terms of our __c11_atomic_* intrinsics (that were
created for this purpose).
C11 7.1.4p1 requires function declarations for atomic_thread_fence,
atomic_signal_fence, atomic_flag_test_and_set,
atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit, and atomic_flag_clear, and requires that
they have external linkage. Accordingly, we provide these declarations, but if
a user elides the shadowing macros and uses them, then they must have a libc
(or similar) that actually provides definitions.
atomic_flag is implemented using _Bool as the underlying type. This is
consistent with the implementation provided by FreeBSD and also GCC 4.9 (at
least when __GCC_ATOMIC_TEST_AND_SET_TRUEVAL == 1).
Patch by Richard Smith (rebased and slightly edited by me -- Richard said I
should drive at this point).
llvm-svn: 218957
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit r218913 while I investigate some bots.
llvm-svn: 218917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update debug info testcases for an LLVM metadata schema change to fold
metadata constant operands into a single `MDString`.
Part of PR17891.
llvm-svn: 218913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds support for the align_value attribute. This attribute is supported by
Intel's compiler (versions 14.0+), and several of my HPC users have requested
support in Clang. It specifies an alignment assumption on the values to which a
pointer points, and is used by numerical libraries to encourage efficient
generation of vector code.
Of course, we already have an aligned attribute that can specify enhanced
alignment for a type, so why is this additional attribute important? The
problem is that if you want to specify that an input array of T is, say,
64-byte aligned, you could try this:
typedef double aligned_double attribute((aligned(64)));
void foo(aligned_double *P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // What alignment did those doubles have again?
}
the access here to P[1] causes problems. P was specified as a pointer to type
aligned_double, and any object of type aligned_double must be 64-byte aligned.
But if P[0] is 64-byte aligned, then P[1] cannot be, and this access causes
undefined behavior. Getting round this problem requires a lot of awkward
casting and hand-unrolling of loops, all of which is bad.
With the align_value attribute, we can accomplish what we'd like in a well
defined way:
typedef double *aligned_double_ptr attribute((align_value(64)));
void foo(aligned_double_ptr P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // This is fine too.
}
This attribute does not create a new type (and so it not part of the type
system), and so will only "propagate" through templates, auto, etc. by
optimizer deduction after inlining. This seems consistent with Intel's
implementation (thanks to Alexey for confirming the various Intel-compiler
behaviors).
As a final note, I would have chosen to call this aligned_value, not
align_value, for better naming consistency with the aligned attribute, but I
think it would be more useful to users to adopt Intel's name.
llvm-svn: 218910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prior to GCC 4.4, __sync_fetch_and_nand was implemented as:
{ tmp = *ptr; *ptr = ~tmp & value; return tmp; }
but this was changed in GCC 4.4 to be:
{ tmp = *ptr; *ptr = ~(tmp & value); return tmp; }
in response to this change, support for sync_fetch_and_nand (and
sync_nand_and_fetch) was removed in r99522 in order to avoid miscompiling code
depending on the old semantics. However, at this point:
1. Many years have passed, and the amount of code relying on the old
semantics is likely smaller.
2. Through the work of many contributors, all LLVM backends have been updated
such that "atomicrmw nand" provides the newer GCC 4.4+ semantics (this process
was complete July of 2014 (added to the release notes in r212635).
3. The lack of this intrinsic is now a needless impediment to porting codes
from GCC to Clang (I've now seen several examples of this).
It is true, however, that we still set GNUC_MINOR to 2 (corresponding to GCC
4.2). To compensate for this, and to address the original concern regarding
code relying on the old semantics, I've added a warning that specifically
details the fact that the semantics have changed and that we provide the newer
semantics.
Fixes PR8842.
llvm-svn: 218905
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 218666
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 218507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In addition to __builtin_assume_aligned, GCC also supports an assume_aligned
attribute which specifies the alignment (and optional offset) of a function's
return value. Here we implement support for the assume_aligned attribute by making
use of the @llvm.assume intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 218500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
AFAICT the semantics of frem match libm's fmod.
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <tom@stellard.net>
llvm-svn: 218488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts bits of r218166 that are no longer necessary now that r218394 made
-Wmissing-prototype-for-cc a regular warning.
llvm-svn: 218400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes PR21027. The MIDL compiler produces code that does this.
If we wanted to improve the warning, I think we could do this:
void __stdcall f(); // Don't warn without -Wstrict-prototypes.
void g() {
f(); // Might warn, the user probably meant for f to take no args.
f(1, 2, 3); // Warn, we have no idea what args f takes.
f(1); // Error, this is insane, one of these calls is broken.
}
Reviewers: thakis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5481
llvm-svn: 218394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
_addcarryx_u64
_addcarry_u64
_subborrow_u64
Thanks Pasi Parviainen for notice.
llvm-svn: 218376
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 218298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary: This is a test for this patch: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5445.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5446
llvm-svn: 218271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Only tests under test/Driver should use %clang, and test/CodeGen in
particular must always use %clang_cc1.
llvm-svn: 218260
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 218256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
Vectors are normally 16-byte aligned, however the O32 ABI enforces a
maximum alignment of 8-bytes since the base of the stack is 8-byte aligned.
Previously, this was enforced on the caller side, but not on the callee side.
This fixes the output of OpenCL's printf when given vectors.
Reviewers: atanasyan
Reviewed By: atanasyan
Subscribers: llvm-commits, pekka.jaaskelainen
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5433
llvm-svn: 218248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
This fixes PR20023. In order to implement this scoping rule, we piggy
back on the existing LabelDecl machinery, by creating LabelDecl's that
will carry the "internal" name of the inline assembly label, which we
will rewrite the asm label to.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4589
llvm-svn: 218230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
prototype too.
According to lore, we used to verifier-fail on:
void __thiscall f();
int main() { f(1); }
So that's fixed now. System headers use prototype-less __stdcall functions,
so make that a warning that's DefaultError -- then it fires on regular code
but is suppressed in system headers.
Since it's used in system headers, we have codegen tests for this; massage
them slightly so that they still compile.
llvm-svn: 218166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They are added to adxintrin.h but outside __ADX__ block.
These intrinics generates adc and sbb correspondingly that were available before ADX
llvm-svn: 218118
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 218117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
128-bit unless the target CPU supports AVX.
rdar://problem/11846140
llvm-svn: 218082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The 'x' constraint is for "any SSE register", and GCC seems to include the
256-bit ymm registers in that concept.
llvm-svn: 218073
|
|
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 218064
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is another follow-up patch to r217996.
llvm-svn: 218003
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a follow-up to r217994.
llvm-svn: 217996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
S, D, A, y, x, f, t, and u.
This is a follow-up patch for r167717.
rdar://problem/11846140
rdar://problem/17476970
llvm-svn: 217994
|