| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
tests fail.
llvm-svn: 188447
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
delete the block we began emitting into if it had no predecessors. We never
want to do this, because there are several valid cases during statement
emission where an existing block has no known predecessors but will acquire
some later. The case in my test case doesn't inherently fall into this
category, because we could safely emit the case-range code before the statement
body, but there are examples with labels that can't be fallen into
that would also demonstrate this bug.
rdar://problem/8837067
llvm-svn: 123303
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 100235
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 89465
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Tests and drivers updated, still need to shuffle dirs.
llvm-svn: 67602
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 50968
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 45372
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 44484
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 44453
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 42766
|
| |
|
|
| |
llvm-svn: 42648
|
|
|
llvm-svn: 42616
|
